Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 6662 Kant
Judgement Date : 20 September, 2023
-1-
NC: 2023:KHC:34126
CRL.RP No. 411 of 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJENDRA BADAMIKAR
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 411 OF 2016
BETWEEN:
M/S. INDIRA FOODS,
UNIT NO.5, LAKSHMI INDUSTRIAL ESTATE,
SY.NO.10/1, KANAKANAGAR,
YELACHENAHALLI,
KANAKAPURA ROAD,
BANGALORE-560 078,
REPRESENTED BY AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY,
MR.VIJAY C.
...PETITIONER
(BY SMT. SUJA SURENDAR, ADVOCATE FOR
SRI. VAMSHI KRISHNA .C AND
SRI. ANAND MUTTALLI, ADVOCATES)
AND:
M/S. ALL CARGO LOGISTICS LTD,
NO.402, 3RD FLOOR,
OXFORM CHAMGERS,
Digitally RUSTAM BAGH MAIN ROAD,
signed by
KODIHALLI,
RENUKAMBA
BANGALORE-560 017.
KG
...RESPONDENT
Location: (BY SRI. ROHITH D.K, ADVOCATE FOR
High Court of SRI. PRASHANTH M.V, ADVOCATE)
Karnataka
THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 OF CR.P.C
PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER OF CONVICTION AND
SENTENCE INCLUDING THE PAYMENT OF FINE VIDE ORDER
DATED 21.12.2015 PASSED BY THE LIX ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND
S.J., BANGALORE CITY IN CRL.A.NO.591/2015 CONFIRMING
-2-
NC: 2023:KHC:34126
CRL.RP No. 411 of 2016
THE ORDER DATED 31.03.2015 PASSED BY THE XXV A.C.M.M.,
BANGALORE IN C.C.NO.14083/2012.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR HEARING THIS DAY,
THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
The authorized signatory for revision petitioner / accused
Mr.Ravi D. and authorized signatory for respondent /
complainant Mr.Mithun G. Shetty are present. Their respective
counsels are present.
2. The parties have filed a joint compromise petition
under Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
reporting the compounding of the offence. It is submitted that
the matter was settled amicably between the parties for a sum
of Rs.4,50,000/- and R.2,00,000/- was paid on 20.09.2023 by
way of a Demand Draft dated 19.09.2023 itself and the balance
as required to be paid on or before 30.11.2023 and a post
dated cheque was also issued towards repayment of the said
installment. Hence, permission was sought for compounding of
the offences.
3. The Both the parties have also filed a joint affidavit
reporting settlement. The contents of the compromise petition
are read over and explained to the parties in presence of their
NC: 2023:KHC:34126 CRL.RP No. 411 of 2016
respective counsels in Kannada language known to them and
they admit the contents are true and correct. The authorization
letters issued by respective firms were also produced. Both the
counsels are present and endorsed the compromise.
4. I am satisfied that the parties have settled their
dispute amicably without any threat or coercion. The
compromise is not against any settled law. In view of the same,
the application filed under Section 147 of the Negotiable
Instruments Act, 1881 needs to be allowed. Accordingly, I
proceed to pass the following:
ORDER
(i) The application filed by both the parties under
Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act,
1881 is allowed. The matter stands compounded.
(ii) The impugned judgment of conviction and order
of sentence passed by learned XXV Additional
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate and JMFC,
Turuvekere in C.C.No.14083/2012 dated
31.03.2015 and confirmed in Crl.A.No.591/2015
by Learned LIX Additional City Civil and Sessions
NC: 2023:KHC:34126 CRL.RP No. 411 of 2016
Judge, Bangalore city vide judgment dated
21.12.2015 are set aside.
(iii) The accused / revision petitioner stands
acquitted of the offence punishable under
Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act,
1881.
(iv) In view of the compounding of the offence, the
bail bonds executed by the accused / revision
petitioner stand cancelled.
(v) The compromise petition shall be part of this
order.
Sd/-
JUDGE
SS
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!