Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Smt Lakshmi vs The Director
2023 Latest Caselaw 8871 Kant

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 8871 Kant
Judgement Date : 29 November, 2023

Karnataka High Court

Smt Lakshmi vs The Director on 29 November, 2023

                                              -1-
                                                         NC: 2023:KHC:43168
                                                      WP No. 26218 of 2023




                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                         DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2023

                                           BEFORE

                           THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI

                        WRIT PETITION NO. 26218 OF 2023 (EDN-RES)

                   BETWEEN:

                   SMT LAKSHMI
                   (PREVIOUSLY NAMED ASHA G),
                   WIFE OF LATE SHIVALINGA,
                   AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS,
                   R/AT NO.234/16,
                   ADAKAMAANAHALLI, MAKALI POST,
                   BENGALURU 560 162.
                                                              ...PETITIONER

                   (BY SRI. ABHISHEK GOWDA A.H., ADVOCATE FOR
                       SRI. ROHAN HOSMATH, ADVOCATE)

                   AND:
Digitally signed   1.    THE DIRECTOR
by SUNITHA
                         DEPARTMENT OF PRE UNIVERSITY EDUCATION,
GANGARAJU
                         SAMPIGE ROAD,
Location: High           18TH CROSS, MALLESHWARAM,
Court of                 BENGALURU 560012
Karnataka
                   2.    THE DIRECTOR
                         SECONDARY EDUCATION BOARD,
                         6TH CROSS ROAD, MALLESHWARAM,
                         BENGALURU 560003

                   3.    THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR
                         DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION,
                         BENGALURU NORTH, K G ROAD,
                         BENGALURU 560009
                               -2-
                                            NC: 2023:KHC:43168
                                        WP No. 26218 of 2023




4.   BLOCK EDUCATION OFFICER
     BENGALURU NORTH-4,
     GOVT FIRST GRADE COLLEGE,
     YELAHANKA,
     BENGALURU 560064
                                               ...RESPONDENTS

(BY SMT. MAMATHA SHETTY, AGA FOR R1)

      THIS WRIT PETITION      IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226
AND 227 OF THE CONSITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT
THE R1 TO R4 TO TAKE NECESSARY STEPS TO CHANGE THE
NAME OF THE PETITIONER FROM ASHA TO LAKSHMI IN ALL
THE EDUCATIONAL RECORD, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
JUDGMENT AND DECREE PASSED BY THE COURT OF V ADDL.
CITY CIVIL AND SESSION JUDGE BANGALORE(CCH-13) IN OS
NO.1108/2022 DTD 12.12.2022 PRODUCED HEREWITH AS
ANNX-E.


      THIS   PETITION,   COMING       ON    FOR   PRELIMINARY
HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:


                         ORDER

The petitioner filed this writ petition seeking for a

mandamus directing the respondents to take necessary

steps to incorporate the name changed in accordance with

judgment and decree dated 12.12.2022 in

O.S.No.1108/2022 passed by the learned V Additional City

Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru.

NC: 2023:KHC:43168

2. Brief facts leading rise to filing of this petition are

as under:

It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner was

born on 11.06.1991. The petitioner has completed her

lower Primary education in Adakamaranahalli village,

Lower Primary Government School up to 7th standard and

the petitioner has completed Pre-University course in the

month of July 2009. After completion of Pre University

education, the petitioner has obtained her Transfer

Certificate on 09.08.2009. The petitioner has submitted a

representation to the respondent Nos.1 to 4 to change the

name from Asha G to Lakshmi and the petitioner has

taken out paper publication in two newspapers.

Thereafter, the respondent Nos.1 to 4 did not pass any

orders on the representation submitted by the petitioner.

Hence, the petitioner filed the suit in O.S.No.1108/2022

seeking for the relief of declaration that the name of the

petitioner is Lakshmi and not as Asha and further sought

mandatory injunction directing the respondents to change

NC: 2023:KHC:43168

the name of the petitioner from Asha to Lakshmi. The said

suit came to be decreed vide judgment dated 12.12.2022.

The petitioner submitted a representation along with

judgment and decree passed in the aforesaid suit. The

respondents have not passed any orders on the

representation nor complied directions issued in the said

suit. Hence, this writ petition.

3. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned

Additional Government Advocate for the respondents.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

the petitioner filed a suit in O.S.No.1108/2022 seeking for

the relief of declaration for change of name from Lakshmi

to Asha. The said suit came to be decreed vide judgment

dated 12.12.2022. The petitioner has submitted a

representation along with the judgment passed in the

aforesaid suit. The respondent Nos.1 to 4 have neither

complied with the directions issued by the learned City

Civil and Sessions Judge nor passed any orders on the

NC: 2023:KHC:43168

representation submitted by the petitioner. Hence, he

prays to allow the writ petition.

5. Per contra, learned Additional Government

Advocate for the respondents submits that if reasonable

time is granted to the respondents, the respondents will

consider the representation and pass an appropriate order

in accordance with law.

6. Perused the records and considered the

submissions made by learned counsel for the parties.

7. The petitioner filed a suit in O.S.No.1108/2022

for declaration that change in the name of the petitioner is

Lakshmi and not as Asha and further directed the

respondents to change the name of petitioner as Lakshmi

in the place of Asha in all educational records of the

petitioner. Inspite of the decree passed by the City Civil

and Sessions Judge, the respondents have not complied

the decree passed in the aforesaid suit. The petitioner

submitted a representation vide Annexure-F on

NC: 2023:KHC:43168

14.03.2023 requesting to change of name in SSLC marks

card and issue a fresh marks card. The respondents

inspite of decree passed in the aforesaid suit have not

complied with the directions issued in the said suit and

also not considered the representations.

8. In view of the above discussions, I proceed to

pass the following:

ORDER

Writ petition is allowed.

Respondent Nos.1 to 4 are directed to consider Annexure-F and pass an appropriate order in accordance with law within a period 10 days from the date of receipt of copy of the order.

SD/-

JUDGE

sks

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter