Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 8751 Kant
Judgement Date : 28 November, 2023
-1-
NC: 2023:KHC:42930
MFA No. 6943 of 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 6943 OF 2016 (CPC)
BETWEEN:
MR KALEEMULLA KHAN
S/O LATE SUBHAN KHAN
AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS
RESIDING AT NO 65, 1ST CROSS
KAUSARNAGAR, DINNUR MAIN ROAD
R T NAGAR POST, BANGALORE - 32
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. AZEEMUDDIN M MOTHEKHAN.,ADVOCATE [ABSENT])
AND:
1. MR SHAFIQUDDIN SHARIFF
S/O GHAYSUDDIN SHERIFF
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
NO 40 , OLD SITE NO 65
2ND CROSS, AKKAMMA BLOCK
Digitally signed
by DINNUR MAIN ROAD
DHANALAKSHMI RT NAGAR POST, BANGALORE - 32.
MURTHY
Location: High
Court of 2. THE COMMISSIONER
Karnataka BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE
BANGALORE - 1.
3. ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE
J C NAGAR SUB DIVISION
J C NAGAR MAIN ROAD
BANGALORE - 6.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. ZAKIR HUSSAIN.,ADVOCATE FOR C/R1:
SRI. KEMPANNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
-2-
NC: 2023:KHC:42930
MFA No. 6943 of 2016
THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER ORDER 43, RULE 1(r) OF CPC,
AGAINST THE ORDER DATED:23.9.2016 PASSED ON IA NO.2
AND 3 IN O.S.NO.4895/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE 62ND
ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL JUDGE, (CCH-63), BENGALURU,
REJECTING IA NO.2 FILED U/O 39, RULE 1 & 2 OF CPC AND
ALLOWING IA NO.3 FILED U/O 39, RULE 4, R/W SEC 151 OF CPC.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
This appeal is filed by the plaintiff challenging the
order dated 23.09.2016 whereby the trial court vacated
the ex-parte injunction order granted in favour of the
plaintiff.
2. This Court, by order dated 07.10.2016 directed
the parties to maintain status-quo. On that day, none
appeared for the caveator/first respondent. On
07.01.2020, the matter was posted for orders on
application filed by the respondent/defendant for vacating
the interim order. On that day, none appeared for the
appellant. Since the interim order granted by this Court
on 07.10.2016 was not extended and there is no interim
order in force, on 07.01.2020, this Court disposed of IA
No.2/2016 filed by the respondents for vacating the
NC: 2023:KHC:42930
interim order. Thereafter there is no interim order
operating in this appeal till today. Now the suit is set down
for evidence of the parties.
3. When the matter is called in the morning session,
none appeared for the parties. Even in the afternoon
session also, there is no representation on behalf of the
parties. It appears, that the appellant is not interested in
prosecuting the appeal.
4. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-
prosecution.
Sd/-
JUDGE
CM
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!