Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 8139 Kant
Judgement Date : 22 November, 2023
-1-
NC: 2023:KHC:42016
RFA No. 1624 of 2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1624 OF 2012 (INJ)
BETWEEN:
SRI. G. RAVIKUMAR,
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,
S/O SRI. N. C. GANGADHARAPPA,
R/O HOUSE NO.42, 1ST MAIN,
6TH PHASE, 1ST STAGE,
MAHAGANAPATHI NAGAR,
WEST OF CHORD ROAD, RAJAJINAGAR,
BANGALORE - 560 010,
REPRESENTED BY HIS WIFE AND
GPA HOLDER SMT. PRABHA RAVIKUMAR,
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS.
...APPELLANT
(BY SMT. SRIVIDYA, ADVOCATE FOR
SRI. T.N. VISWANATHA, ADVOCATE AND
Digitally signed by SRI. T.N. RAMESH, ADVOCATE)
R MANJUNATHA
Location: HIGH
COURT OF AND:
KARNATAKA
1. SRI. V. ANANDA KUMAR,
MAJOR,
S/O V. VENKATESH,
R/O NO.16, SUBBAIAH COLONY,
BEHIND LVB BAKERY,
NEAR GUDDADAHALLI BUS STOP,
MYSORE ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 026.
-2-
NC: 2023:KHC:42016
RFA No. 1624 of 2012
2. SRI. JAGADEESH S,
MAJOR,
S/O SANGAPPA KALLUR,
R/O NO.3035, 14TH CROSS,
6TH MAIN, BANASHANKARI II STAGE,
BANGALORE - 560 070.
3. SRI. BASAVESHWARA HOUSE BUILDING
CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED,
BASAVESHWARA LAYOUT,
NEAR BTS GARAGE, VIJAYANAGAR,
BANGALORE - 560 040,
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
SRI. B. JAYADEV.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. C. JAGADISH, ADVOCATE FOR R1;
SRI. J. PRAKASH, ADVOCATE FOR R2;
R3 - SERVED)
THIS RFA IS FILED U/SEC.96 R/W ORDER XLI RULE 1 OF
CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED
01.06.2012 PASSED IN O.S.6772/2009 ON THE FILE OF THE
XLII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE,
BANGALORE, DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR INJUNCTION.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Smt. Srividya, learned counsel for the appellant
submits that despite best efforts, appellant is not
NC: 2023:KHC:42016
cooperating to prosecute the appeal further and had also
not cooperated in preparation of paper books.
2. The suit is one for bare injunction which is
dismissed. Plaintiff has preferred the present appeal which
is pending since the year 2012. Further, seeking for an
order of injunction is a continuous cause of action.
Therefore, no useful purpose would be served in keeping
the appeal pending.
3. Accordingly, placing the submission of
Smt. Srividya, learned counsel for the appellant, appeal
stands dismissed for non prosecution.
Sd/-
JUDGE
MCR
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!