Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 2694 Kant
Judgement Date : 29 May, 2023
-1-
RSA No. 100294 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF MAY, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJENDRA BADAMIKAR
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 100294 OF 2019 (PAR-)
BETWEEN:
1. SHIVANAND S/O GIRIYAPPA TALAWAR
AGE ABOUT: 66 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
R/O: GEJJIHALLI VILLAGE, TQ: HANGAL,
DIST: HAVERI, PIN: 581104.
2. TAMMANNA S/O GIRIYAPPA TALAWAR
AGE ABOUT: 64 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
R/O: GEJJIHALLI VILLAGE, TQ: HANGAL,
DIST: HAVERI, PIN: 581104.
3. GOVINDAPPA S/O GIRIYAPPA TALAWAR
AGE ABOUT: 54 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
R/O: GEJJIHALLI VILLAGE, TQ: HANGAL,
DIST: HAVERI, PIN: 581104.
SUJATA
...APPELLANTS
SUBHASH
PAMMAR (BY SRI. NINAD T KWATIHALLI: AND
Digitally signed PRUTHVIRAJ P HITTALAMANI, ADVOCATES-ABSENT)
by SUJATA
SUBHASH
PAMMAR
AND:
1. SMT.RENUKA W/O NAGENDA HOSAMANI
AGE ABOUT: 52 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD,
R/O: PALA VILLAGE, TQ: MUNDAGOD,
DIST: KARWAR (U.K.).
2. SMT.KANNAVVA W/O KRISHNAPPA WALIKAR
AGE ABOUT: 69 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD,
R/O: KODIYALLAPUR VILLAGE, TQ: HANGAL,
DIST: HAVERI.
-2-
RSA No. 100294 of 2019
3. SMT.SAVAKKA W/O FAKKIRAIPPA WALIKAR
AGE: ABOUT 56 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD,
R/O: MAVAKOPPA VILLAGE, TQ: HANGAL,
DIST: HAVERI.
4. SHIVAPPA S/O RUDRAPPA HOLEMMANAVAR
AGE ABOUT: 64 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
R/O: GEJJIHALLI VILLAGE, TQ HANGAL,
DIST: HAVERI.
5. HANUMANTAPPA S/O GIRIYAPPA TALAWAR
AGE ABOUT: 78 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
R/O: GEJJIHALLI VILLAGE, TQ HANGAL,
DIST: HAVERI.
...RESPONDENTS
THIS RSA FILED U/SEC.100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE
JUDGEMENT & DECREE DATED 07.04.2017 PASSED IN
R.A.NO.26/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND
JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS, HANGAL, PARTLY ALLOWING
THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE
DTD:24.11.2014, PASSED IN O.S. NO. 159/2009 ON THE FILE OF
THE CIVIL JUDGE AND JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS,
HANGAL, PARTLY DECREEING THE SUIT FILED FOR PARTITION AND
SEPARATE POSSESSION AND MESNE PROFITS.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
-3-
RSA No. 100294 of 2019
ORDER
Learned counsel for the appellants called out,
absent even during the second call.
On the last date of hearing, it is submitted that
the appellants are intended to withdraw the appeal.
But today there is no representation on behalf of the
appellants.
The office objections were not complied since
long time. Looking to the earlier submission and
considering non-compliance of the office objections, it
appears that appellants are not interested in
prosecuting the matter any more. Hence, appeal
stands dismissed for non-compliance of office
objections.
Sd/-
JUDGE
SSP
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!