Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 2074 Kant
Judgement Date : 29 March, 2023
-1-
MFA No. 1573 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF MARCH, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.1573 OF 2023 (CPC)
BETWEEN:
1. SRI A S SAVUKAR
S/O. LATE SHIVAPPA SAVUKAR,
AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS,
2. SRI. SHREE HARSHA A.S.
S/O. SRI. ANNAPPA SAVUKAR
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO. 165/B, 1ST G CROSS,
4TH BLOCK, 3RD STAGE,
SHARADA COLONY,
BASAVESHWARA NAGAR,
BENGALURU - 560 079.
... APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. T SESHAGIRI RAO., ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed
1. SRI KAMUJU SURYAHARI SHETTY
by VIJAYA P
S/O. KAMUJU SAHEBSETTY,
Location: High AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,
Court of RESIDING AT NO. 1020,
Karnataka JANAPRIYA LAKE VIEW APARTMENTS,
KODICHIKKANNAHALLI,
BOMMANAHALLI,
BENGALURU - 560 076.
MANAGING PARTNER OF
M/S. SHETTY'S HOSPITAL,
HAVING OFFICE AT NO. 11 AND 12,
12TH F MAIN, KAVERI NAGAR,
BOMMANAHALLI,
BENGALURU - 560 068.
... RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. SIDDHARTH SUMAN, ADVOCATE)
-2-
MFA No. 1573 of 2023
THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER ORDER 43 RULE 1(r) OF CPC, AGAINST
THE ORDER DATED 07.04.2022 PASSED ON I.A. NO.1 IN O.S.NO.
2408/2022 ON THE FILE OF THE LXII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL JUDGE,
BENGALURU, ISSUING EX-PARTE ORDER OF TEMPORARY INJUNCTION.
THIS MFA COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE COURT
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
1. This appeal is directed against the impugned order dated
07.04.2022 passed in O.S.No.2408/2022 passed by the LXII
Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru (CCH-63),
whereby the application, I.A.No.1 filed by the respondent/plaintiff
under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 CPC for temporary injunction
restraining the appellants/defendants from entering upon the suit
schedule premises or any portion thereof or otherwise interfering
with the plaintiff's peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit
schedule premises was allowed.
2. Heard learned counsel for the appellants and learned
counsel for the respondent.
3. The material on record discloses that the respondent-plaintiff
has instituted the aforesaid suit for permanent injunction against
the appellants/defendants. Along with the suit the respondent-
plaintiff having filed the aforesaid application seeking ad-interim
MFA No. 1573 of 2023
order of temporary injunction, the trial court proceeded to pass and
order granting temporary injunction in favour of respondent-plaintiff
restraining the appellants-defendants from entering upon the suit
schedule premises or any portion thereof or otherwise interfering
with the plaintiff's peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit
schedule premises.
4. The learned counsel for appellants and respondent jointly
submit that in addition to I.A.No.1 filed seeking temporary injunction
filed by the plaintiff referred to supra, there are other applications
pending before the trial court. It is also submitted that the suit is
posted before the trial court on 23.05.2023 for consideration of
pending applications.
5. Under these circumstances, though several contentions have
been urged by both sides, without expressing any opinion on the
merits / demerits of the rival contentions of both sides, I deem it just
and appropriate to dispose of this appeal without interfering with
the impugned order and by directing the Trial Court to dispose of all
pending applications filed by both parties in accordance with law as
expeditiously as possible on or before 15.07.2023 without being
influenced by the findings and observations recorded in the
MFA No. 1573 of 2023
impugned order. All rival contentions are kept open and no opinion
is expressed on the same. Both parties are directed to co-operate
with the trial court for expeditious disposal of the pending
applications as directed above.
6. With the aforesaid observations and directions, the appeal
stands disposed of.
Sd/-
JUDGE
NP
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!