Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 2057 Kant
Judgement Date : 28 March, 2023
-1-
RSA No. 528 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF MARCH, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.528 OF 2017 (PAR)
BETWEEN:
SMT. ANITHA @ HALAMMA,
W/O PARAMESHWARAPPA R.T.,
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,
HOUSEHOLD, AGRICULTURIST,
R/O NAGANUR VILLAGE,
DAVANAGERE TALUK AND DISTRICT-577 002.
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI REVANNA BELLARY, ADVOCATE - ABSENT)
AND:
1. KURUVETHAPPA,
S/O MAHADEVAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS,
Digitally signed
by SHARANYA T AGRICULTURIST.
Location: HIGH
COURT OF 2. MAHADEVAPPA,
KARNATAKA
S/O KURUVETHAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,
AGRICULTURIST.
BOTH ARE R/O. BORAGONDANAHALLI,
DAVANAGERE TALUK AND DISTRICT-577 002.
3. SMT. NAGAVENI,
W/O VIJAY KUMAR,
AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS,
HOME MAKER,
D/O BANAKER SHEKARAPPA,
MUSTURALLI, JAGALUR TALUK,
DAVANAGERE DISTRICT-577 528.
-2-
RSA No. 528 of 2017
4. SMT. SUDHA
W/O SURESH,
AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS,
AGRICULTURIST,
R/O CHIKKARKERE VILLAGE,
JAGALUR TALUK,
DAVANAGERE DISTRICT-577 528.
5. SMT. R.B. SAKAMMA,
W/O. HALESHAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,
AGRICULTURIST,
R/O BORAGONDANAHALLI,
DAVANAGERE TALUK AND DISTRICT-577 002.
...RESPONDENTS
THIS R.S.A. IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC
PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE COMPROMISE DECREE DATED
20.01.2014 IN O.S.NO.86/2012 PASSED BY THE PRINCIPAL
CIVIL JUDGE COURT, DAVANAGERE AND JUDGMENT AND
DECREE DATED 17.12.2016 IN R.A.NO.119/2015 ON THE
FILE OF THE I APPELLATE COURT, I ADDITIONAL SENIOR
CIVIL JUDGE COURT, DAVANAGERE TO ORDER FOR EQUAL
1/5TH SHARE IN ALL SUIT NOS.1 TO 4 PROPERTIES EXCEPT 2
ACRES OF ITEM NO.1 SUIT PROERPTY SOLD IN FAVOUR OF
RESPONDENT NO.5 THROUGH OUT COSTS AND ETC.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
This appeal was filed in the year 2017. This Court
vide order dated 02.04.2019, dismissed the appeal for
non-compliance of the office objections. Thereafter, an
application was filed for recalling the order dated
02.04.2019 and this Court recalled the order. After
recalling the order, this matter is listed for the fourth
RSA No. 528 of 2017
time for non compliance of the office objections. There is
no representation on behalf of the appellant today. It
appears that the learned counsel for the appellant is not
interested in pursuing the matter. Hence, the appeal is
dismissed for non-compliance of office objections.
Sd/-
JUDGE
MD
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!