Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1970 Kant
Judgement Date : 23 March, 2023
-1-
CCC No. 200163 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
KALABURAGI BENCH
DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF MARCH, 2023
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV
AND
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR
CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 200163 OF 2022 (CIVIL)
BETWEEN:
M/S PATIL SPUN PIPE INDUSTRIES,
C/O YOGESH SHIVAJI RAO PATIL,
R/O. KUNTAGAON, POST LADHA,
TQ. BHALKI, DIST : BIDAR-585411.
...COMPLAINANT
(BY SRI SHIVASHANKAR H MANUR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,
DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE,
Digitally M.S.BUILDING, BENGALURU-560001.
signed by
SACHIN
Location: High 2. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR,
Court of
Karnataka KARNATAKA UDHYOG MITRA AND
MEMBER SECRETARY, STATE LEVEL
SINGLE WINDOW CLEARANCE COMMITTEE,
VIKAS SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560001.
3. THE PRESIDENT/DEPUTY COMMISSIONER,
DISTRICT LEVEL SINGLE WINDOW CLEARANCE
COMMITTEE OF KIADB, BIDAR-585401.
4. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER,
KIADB, KHANIJA BHAVAN,
RACE COURSE ROAD, BENGALURU-560001.
-2-
CCC No. 200163 of 2022
5. THE DEVELOPMENT OFFICER,
KIADB, KALABURAGI-585101.
6. THE DEPUTY DEVELOPMENT OFFICER,
KIADB, BIDAR-585401.
7. THE JOINT DIRECTOR,
MEMBER SECRETARY,
DISTRICT INDUSTRIES CENTRE,
BIDAR-585401.
...ACCUSED
THIS CCC FILED UNDER ARTICLE 215 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA AND SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE
CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, PRAYING THAT THIS
HONOURABLE COURT BE PLEASED TO INITIATE CONTEMPT
PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THEM IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW
FOR HAVING DISOBEYED THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER PASSED
BY THIS HON'BLE COURT DATED 10.01.2022 IN
W.P.NO.200094/2022 (GM-KIADB) IN THE INTEREST OF
JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS CCC COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY S.SUNIL
DUTT YADAV, J., MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
It is noticed that despite sufficient opportunities there is
no representation on behalf of the complainant and office
objections having not been complied with.
2. Matter was previously called on 20.03.2023 and
noticing that there was no representation on behalf of the
complainant, matter was directed to be listed for dismissal in
the orders list. Even today, there is no representation on behalf
CCC No. 200163 of 2022
of the complainant nor office objections having been complied
with.
In light of the absence of due diligence in prosecuting the
petition, the contempt petition is dismissed for non-
prosecution.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE
SN
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!