Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1857 Kant
Judgement Date : 14 March, 2023
-1-
RP No. 98 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF MARCH, 2023
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. PRASANNA B. VARALE, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI
REVIEW PETITION NO. 98 OF 2023
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.16924 OF 2016
BETWEEN:
M/S. DODDANNAVAR BROTHERS
(REGD. PARTNERSHIP FIRM)
DODANNAVAR COMPOUND
NEAR FORT, BELGAUM - 590016
REP. BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER
SRI RACHAPPA M SARADAGI
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI ATUL CHITALE, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
Digitally signed SRI NITHYA NANDA MURTHY P, ADVOCATE AND
by K P SWETHA MS.BHANU PRETHA, ADVOCATE)
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA AND:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA
REP BY ITS SECRETARY
DEPARTMENT OF FORESTS, ECOLOGY AND
ENVIRONMENT, 4TH FLOOR
M.S.BUILDING
DR.AMBEDKAR ROAD
BENGALURU - 560001
2. STATE OF KARNATAKA
REP BY ITS SECRETARY
-2-
RP No. 98 of 2023
(MINES) DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
AND INDUSTRIES
GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA
VIKASA SOUDHA, 1ST FLOOR
DR AMBEDKAR ROAD
BENGALURU - 560001
3. THE DIRECTOR OF MINES AND GEOLOGY
DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND GEOLOGY
KHANIJA BHAVAN, 5TH FLOOR
RACE COURSE ROAD
BENGALURU - 560001
4. THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS
"ARANYA BHAVAN"
18TH CROSS, MALLESHWARAM
BENGALURU - 560003
5. THE DEPUTY CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS
BAGALKOT DIVISION
BAGALKOT- 580001
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI S.S.MAHENDRA, AGA)
THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER XLVII
RULE 1 R/W SECTION 114 OF CPC, PRAYING THAT THIS
HON'BLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO REVIEW THE JUDGMENT
AND THE ORDER DATED 05.06.2020 PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE
HIGH COURT IN WRIT PETITION NO.16924 OF 2016 AND ETC.
THIS REVIEW PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS
DAY, CHIEF JUSTICE MADE THE FOLLOWING:
-3-
RP No. 98 of 2023
ORDER
After arguing the matter for some time, Sri Atul Chitale,
the learned Senior Counsel for the review petitioner prays for
withdrawal of the review petition with liberty to file a fresh writ
petition.
2. In view of the above submission, the review petition
is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the review petitioner
to file a fresh writ petition raising all the contentions and
grounds urged in the review petition.
3. All contentions are kept open.
4. In view of dismissal of the petition, the pending
interlocutory application does not survive for consideration and
the same is accordingly disposed of.
Sd/-
CHIEF JUSTICE
Sd/-
JUDGE KPS
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!