Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Smt. M. Prabhavathi vs M/S Sunrise Group
2023 Latest Caselaw 3750 Kant

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 3750 Kant
Judgement Date : 27 June, 2023

Karnataka High Court
Smt. M. Prabhavathi vs M/S Sunrise Group on 27 June, 2023
Bench: H.P.Sandesh
                                              -1-
                                                      NC: 2023:KHC:22175
                                                         MFA No. 2645 of 2023




                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                              DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF JUNE, 2023

                                             BEFORE

                               THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH

                        MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.2645 OF 2023 (CPC)

                   BETWEEN:

                   SMT. M. PRABHAVATHI,
                   W/O C.R. LAKSHMINARAYAN,
                   AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,
                   R/AT NO.277, 6TH CROSS,
                   1ST MAIN ROAD, DOMLUR LAYOUT,
                   BENGLURU-560 071.

                   REP. BY HER GPA HOLDER
                   MR. R.L MYUR SUPRATHIK,
                   S/O C.R LAKSHMINARYAN,
                   AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS,
                   R/AT NO.277, 6TH CROSS,
                   1ST MAIN ROAD, DOMLURU LAYOUT,
                   BENGALURU 560 071
                                                                   ...APPELLANT
Digitally signed
by SHARANYA T
Location: HIGH                 (BY SRI RAHUL S. REDDY, ADVOCATE)
COURT OF
KARNATAKA          AND:

                   1.   M/S. SUNRISE GROUP,
                        A REGISTERED PARTNERSHIP FIRM,
                        HAVING ITS OFFICE AT
                        NO.780, 9TH 'A' MAIN,
                        INDIRANAGAR 1ST STAGE,
                        BENGALURU -560 038.
                        REP. BY ITS PARTNERS.

                   2.   SRI B. RAJANNA,
                        S/O VARADAPPA,
                        AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS,
                        R/AT NO.25, BENDIGANAHALLI
                            -2-
                                 NC: 2023:KHC:22175
                                    MFA No. 2645 of 2023




     MANDUR POST,
     BANGALORE EAST TALUK,
     BENGALURU -560 049

3.   SMT. M.S. DHANALAKSHMI,
     W/O R. SHANKAR
     AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS,

4.   SRI JYOTHIR TEJOMAY S.,
     S/O R. SHANKAR,
     AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS.

     R3 AND R4 ARE RESIDING AT NO.424,
     4TH 'G' MAIN ROAD, HRBR LAYOUT,
     2ND BLOCK, KALYANAGAR,
     BENGALURU -560 043.

5.   SRI ALLE DIVAKAR REDDY,
     S/O A.V. SHIVA REDDY,
     AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS,
     R/AT NO.10, 1ST FLOOR,
     KAVERI NILAYA, 6TH CROSS,
     3B CROSS, GURURAJA LAYOUT,
     DODDANEKUNDI, MARATHALLI POST,
     BENGALURU -560037
                                          ...RESPONDENTS

       (BY SRI SHARATH S. GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R5;
                       R3 SERVED)

     THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER ORDER 43 RULE 1(r) READ
WITH SECTION 151 OF CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED
09.03.2023 PASSED IN O.S.NO.475/2023 ON THE FILE OF THE
VII ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL
DISTRICT, BENGALURU, PRAYING TO GRANT AD-INTERIM EX-
PARTE    TEMPORARY    INJUNCTION     RESTRAINING    THE
RESPONDENT NO.5 FROM ALIENATING OR CREATING ANY
THIRD PARTY RIGHTS OVER THE SUIT SCHEDULE PROPERTY.

    THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
                                -3-
                                       NC: 2023:KHC:22175
                                          MFA No. 2645 of 2023




                         JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for respondent No.5 submits that

the next date of hearing before the Trial Court is on

07.07.2023 and they are going to appear before the Trial

Court since suit summons has been ordered by the Trial Court

and no interim order is granted. The learned counsel submits

that when there is no order, the appeal is not maintainable.

2. The learned counsel for the appellant submits that

if they are appearing on 07.07.2023, a direction can be given

to the Trial Court to dispose of the I.A. within one month.

3. This appeal is filed against the order of issuance of

summons and no interim order has been granted. Hence, it is

appropriate to direct the Trial Court to dispose of the I.A.

within one month from the date of next hearing i.e.,

07.07.2023, by giving an opportunity to both the parties.

4. Accordingly, the appeal is disposed of.

Sd/-

JUDGE MD

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter