Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 3748 Kant
Judgement Date : 27 June, 2023
-1-
NC: 2023:KHC:22174
MFA No. 2669 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF JUNE, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.2669 OF 2023 (CPC)
BETWEEN:
SMT. M.PRABHAVATHI,
W/O C.R. LAKSHMINARAYAN,
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,
R/AT NO.277, 6TH CROSS,
1ST MAIN ROAD, DOMLUR LAYOUT,
BENGALURU 560071.
REP. BY HER GPA HOLDER
MR. R.L. MAYUR SUPRATHIK
S/O C.R. LAKSHMINARAYAN,
AGED 22 YEARS
R/AT NO.277, 6TH CROSS,
1ST MAIN ROAD, DOMLUR LAYOUT,
BENGALURU 560071.
...APPELLANT
Digitally signed
by SHARANYA T
Location: HIGH (BY SRI RAHUL S. REDDY, ADVOCATE)
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
AND:
1. M/S SUNRISE GROUP,
A REGISTERED PARTNERSHIP FIRM,
HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO.780,
9TH A MAIN, INDIRANAGAR, 1ST STAGE,
BENGALURU 560038.
REP. BY ITS PARTNERS.
2. SRI B. RAJANNA,
S/O VARADAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS,
R/AT NO.25, BENDIGANAHALLI,
MANDUR POST,
-2-
NC: 2023:KHC:22174
MFA No. 2669 of 2023
BANGALORE EAST TALUK,
BENGALURU 560049.
3. SMT. M.S. DHANALAKSHMI,
W/O R. SHANKAR,
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS.
4. SRI JYOTHIR TEJOMAY S,
S/O R. SHANKAR
AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS.
R3 AND R4 ARE RESIDING AT NO.424,
4TH G MAIN ROAD, HRBR LAYOUT,
2ND BLOCK, KALYANAGAR,
BENGALURU-560043.
5. SRI VINOD KUMAR KALIKIRI,
S/O LATE K. RAJA REDDY,
AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS,
R/A VITTLAM VILLAGE AND POST,
VAYALPAD MANDAL,
CHITTOR DISTRICT,
ANDHRA PRADESH-517299.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI SHARATH S. GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R5;
R3 SERVED)
THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER ORDER 43 RULE 1(r) READ
WITH SECTION 151 OF CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED
09.03.2023 PASSED ON I.A.NO.1 IN OS.NO.472/2023 ON THE
FILE OF THE VII ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,
BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU, PRAYING TO
GRANT AD-INTERIM EX-PARTE TEMPORARY INJUNCTION
RESTRAINING THE RESPONDENT NO.5 FROM ALIENATING OR
CREATING ANY THIRD PARTY RIGHTS OVER THE SUIT
SCHEDULE PROPERTY.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
-3-
NC: 2023:KHC:22174
MFA No. 2669 of 2023
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for respondent No.5 submits that
the next date of hearing before the Trial Court is on
07.07.2023 and they are going to appear before the Trial
Court since suit summons has been ordered by the Trial Court
and no interim order is granted. The learned counsel submits
that when there is no order, the appeal is not maintainable.
2. The learned counsel for the appellant submits that
if they are appearing on 07.07.2023, a direction can be given
to the Trial Court to dispose of the I.A. within one month.
3. This appeal is filed against the order of issuance of
summons and no interim order has been granted. Hence, it is
appropriate to direct the Trial Court to dispose of the I.A.
within one month from the date of next hearing i.e.,
07.07.2023, by giving an opportunity to both the parties.
4. Accordingly, the appeal is disposed of.
Sd/-
JUDGE MD
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!