Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 3567 Kant
Judgement Date : 21 June, 2023
-1-
NC: 2023:KHC:21412
WP No. 9752 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF JUNE, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV
WRIT PETITION NO. 9752 OF 2023 (T-IT)
BETWEEN:
KARDIA VENKATEGOWDA SHANKAR,
S/O K VENKATEGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS,
NO.145, VENKAT, 5TH MAIN ROAD,
CHAMARAJPET,
BANGALORE-560018.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI R CHANDRASHEKAR, ADV.)
AND:
1. ASSESSMENT UNIT,
NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTER,
DELHI-110001.
2. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER
Digitally signed
by WARD -5(2)(1),
MARIGANGAIAH
PREMAKUMARI BMTC BUILDING,
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KORAMANGALA,
KARNATAKA BANGALORE-560095.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI SUSHAL TIWARI, ADV.)
THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227
OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, IS PRAYING TO SET ASIDE
THE FOLLOWING ORDERS PASSED BY THE RESPONDENTS IN
THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE I) ORDER DATED 28.03.2022
PASSED U/S 147 RWS 144 RWS 144B OF THE ACT (ANNX-F)
(DIN ITBA/AST/S/147/2021-22/1041833069 (1)) AND ETC.
-2-
NC: 2023:KHC:21412
WP No. 9752 of 2023
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
The petitioner has assailed the validity of the
orders passed by the respondent at Annexure-F under
Section 147 of the Income Tax Act and the order of
penalty at Annexures-G, H, J, K and L.
2. The petitioner submits that notices were uploaded
in the e-filing port. It is submitted that, in light of the
petitioner not being conversant with the verification of
portal, notices did not come to his attention.
3. Learned counsel for the Revenue submits that
notices were however served.
4. It is noticed that the authority has concluded the
assessment on the basis that the assessee has not replied
and has passed best judgment assessment under Section
144 of the Income Tax Act.
NC: 2023:KHC:21412 WP No. 9752 of 2023
5. In light of the contention raised regarding non-
service of notice, it would meet the ends of justice, to
afford a further opportunity to the petitioner to reply to
the notices and the authority could then proceed further
thereafter. Accordingly, the matter is relegated to the
authorities concerned to the stage of 148 of the Income
Tax Act at Annexure-B.
Petitioner to reply to the same in appropriate
manner and authorities to proceed further. Accordingly,
the order at Annexure-F and order of Penalty at
Annexures-G, H, J, K and L are set aside and the matter is
disposed off in terms of the above.
All contentions of both sides are left open.
Sd/-
JUDGE
MPK CT:bms
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!