Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 3206 Kant
Judgement Date : 13 June, 2023
-1-
NC: 2023:KHC:20494
CRL.A No. 1497 of 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JUNE, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1497 OF 2016
BETWEEN:
SRI. VISHAN RAJ,
S/O. LATE. MISRIMAL,
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS,
NOW RESIDING AT NO.28,
"MISRI NIVAS", 11TH CROSS,
H.N. LAYOUT,
VIYALIKAVAL,
BANGALORE - 560 003.
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. SRINIVAS N., ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
AND:
Digitally signed 1. AGUILA INFOTECH PVT., LTD.,
by REKHA R NO.14-4-50/4,
Location: High
Court of 2ND FLOOR, DEENAR,
Karnataka MANSION, BALMATTA ROAD,
HAMPANAKATTA,
MANGALORE - 575 001
REPRESENTED BY MANAGING DIRECTOR,
GIRISH RAI ALEKKADY.
2. SRI. GIRISH RAI ALEKKADY,
S/O. RAMANNA RAI,
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,
R/AT NO.4-7-730/8,
-2-
NC: 2023:KHC:20494
CRL.A No. 1497 of 2016
KODIYAL BAILU,
MANGALORE,
DAKSHINA KANNADA - 575 001.
AND ALSO AT
D.NO.14-4501/4,
DEENAR MANSION,
2ND FLOOR, BALMATTA ROAD,
HAMPANAKATTA,
MANGALORE - 575 001.
AND ALSO AT
AGUILA INFOTECH PVT., LTD.,
NO.14-4-50/4, 2ND FLOOR,
DEENAR MANSION,
BALMATTA ROAD,
HAMPANAKATTA,
MANGALORE - 575 001.
3. SMT. SHUBHA GIRISH RAI,
W/O. GIRISH RAI ALEKKADY,
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,'
RESIDING AT NO.4-7-730/8,
KODIYAL BAILU,
MANGALORE,
DAKSHINA KANNADA - 575 001.
AND ALSO AT
AGUILA INFOTECH PVT., LTD.,
NO.14-4-50/4, 2ND FLOOR,
DEENAR MANSION,
BALMATTA ROAD,
HAMPANAKATTA,
MANGALORE - 575 001.
...RESPONDENTS
THIS CRL.A. IS FILED U/S.378(4) OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO
SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 01.07.2016 PASSED BY THE XIX
ACMM, BANGALORE IN C.C.NO.3569/2016, WHO WAS PLEASED
TO DISMISSED THE COMPLAINANT AS NON-PROSECUTION
-3-
NC: 2023:KHC:20494
CRL.A No. 1497 of 2016
AND ACQUITTED THE ACCUSED NO.2 FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S
138 OF N.I ACT.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
No representation on behalf of the appellant.
2. The matter is of the year 2016.
3. On 01.12.2022, a conditional order was passed
granting two weeks time, with a condition that, if steps are
not taken by the next date, necessary orders would be
passed for dismissal of the appeal.
4. Thereafter, one more adjournment is granted,
at the request of learned counsel for appellant despite the
same steps are not taken.
5. It appears that appellant is not interested in
prosecuting the appeal.
NC: 2023:KHC:20494 CRL.A No. 1497 of 2016
Hence, appeal is dismissed for non prosecution.
Sd/-
JUDGE
URN
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!