Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 2934 Kant
Judgement Date : 6 June, 2023
-1-
CRL.RP No. 100030 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JUNE, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ANIL B KATTI
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 100030 OF 2020 (397-)
BETWEEN:
SRI.DUNDAPPA S/O MALAKAPPA VALAKOTI
AGE: 93 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS,
R/O: MAITRI GALLI, JAMAKHANDI,
DIST: BAGALKOT-587-301.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SAURABH A SONDUR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
CHIKKAYYA S/O SHRISHAILAYYA GADAD
AGE: 55 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS,
R/O: GADAD GALLI, JAMAKHANDI,
DIST: BAGALKOT-587301.
Digitally
signed by J
MAMATHA
J
MAMATHA Date: ...RESPONDENT
2023.06.08
13:15:34 -
0700
THE CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S 397
R/W SECTION 401 OF CR.P.C., SEEKING TO SET ASIDE THE
JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 07/08/2018 PASSED BY THE I
ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BAGALKOT, TO SIT
AT JAMKHANDI, IN CRL.A. NO.33/2013, FOR OFFENCES
PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 138 NI ACT AND
CONSEQUENTLY, CONFIRM THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF
ACQUITTAL DATED: 14/02/2013 PASSED BY THE PRL. CIVIL
JUDGE, JAMKHANDI IN C.C.NO.161/2009 REGISTERED FOR
OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 138 OF N.I. ACT
AND ACQUIT THE PETITIONERS.
-2-
CRL.RP No. 100030 of 2020
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION, COMING ON FOR
ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Heard Sri.Saurabh A Sondur, learned counsel for
revision petitioner on office objection regarding
maintainability of revision petition.
Revision petitioner/complainant is challenging the
judgment of first appellate Court on the file of I Additional
District and Sessions Court, Bagalkot to Sit at Jamakhandi,
in criminal appeal No.33/2013 dated 07.08.2018 which
has set-aside the judgment of conviction passed against
respondent/accused for the offence punishable under
Section 138 of NI Act, in C.C.No.161/2009 vide judgment
dated 14.02.2013.
Therefore, judgment of acquittal has to be challenged
before this Court in terms of Section 378(4) of Cr.P.C. and
revision petition is not maintainable and accordingly, office
objections are upheld. consequently, proceed to pass the
following:
CRL.RP No. 100030 of 2020
ORDER
The revision petition filed by the complainant is
dismissed as not maintainable with liberty to
respondent/complainant to file appeal in terms of Section
378(4) of Cr.P.C.
(Sd/-) JUDGE
AC
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!