Sri Denis Lobo vs Sri David Nixon D Souza
2023 Latest Caselaw 2831 Kant

                                                     -1-
                                                               RP No. 541 of 2022




                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                                DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF JUNE, 2023

                                                     BEFORE

                             THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMAR

                                  REVIEW PETITION NO. 541 OF 2022

                      BETWEEN :

Digitally signed by   1.     SRI. DENIS LOBO
ANUSHA V                     S/O LATE CHARLES LOBO
Location: HIGH               AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
                      2.     SMT. PATRICIA LOBO
                             W/O SRI. DENIS LOBO
                             AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS

                             PETITIONERS NO.1 & 2 ARE
                             RESIDING AT FLAT NO. 306
                             3RD FLOOR, CRYSTAL ARC BUILDING
                             BALMATTA ROAD, MANGALORE
                             D.K.DISTRICT-575 001                       ... PETITIONERS

                      (BY SMT. ELIZABETH RODRIGUES, ADVOCATE - [ABSENT])

                      AND :

                      1.     SRI. DAVID NIXON D'SOUZA
                             S/O DENNIS D' SOUZA
                             AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS

                      2.     SRI. JOSEPH D' SOUZA
                             S/O DENNIS D' SOUZA
                             AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS

                             RESPONDENTS NO.1 & 2
                             BOTH ARE RESIDING AT
                             NEAR KEMMINJE TEMPLE
                             KEMMINJE VILLAGE, DARBE POST
                             PUTTUR TALUK
                             D.K.DISTRICT-574 202
                            -2-
                                          RP No. 541 of 2022




3.   SMT. IDA D'SOUZA
     W/O LOY CLAUDIUS D'SOUZA
     AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS
     RESIDING AT D'SOUZA COMPOUND
     KULASHEKARA, KAIKAMBA POST
     MANGALORE, D.K.-575 007
4.   SRI. SUNIL KUMAR SHETTY
     S/O K. SANJEEVA SHETTY
     AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
     RESIDING AT K.S.K. COMPOUND
     NEHRU NAGAR POST
     PUTTUR TALUK
     D.K. DISTRICT-574 204
5.   SRI. RAKESH S. KULAL
     S/O SHESHAPPA KULAL
     AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS
     RESIDING AT NEKKARE HOUSE
     SHANTHIGODU VILLAGE AND POST
     PUTTUR TALUK
     D.K. DISTRICT-574 208

6.   THE MCC BANK LTD
     PUTTUR BRANCH
     REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER
     PUTTUR TALUK
     D.K. DISTRICT-574 201

7.   THE MCC BANK LTD
     HEAD OFFICE MANGALORE, D.K.
     REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER
     ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE
     ST. ALOYSIUS COLLEGE ROAD
     HAMPANAKATTA, MANGALORE
     D.K. DISTRICT-575 003

8.   SRI. N. SUDHAKARA SHETTY
     S/O SRI. THYAMPANNA SHETTY
     AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS
     R/AT MUDUPUNADKA,
     BADAGANNU VILLAGE,
     PUTTUR TALUK,
     D.K. DISTRICT - 574 201.
                             -3-
                                         RP No. 541 of 2022




9.    SMT. HEMALATHA S. SHETTY
      W/O N. SUDHAKARA SHETTY
      AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS

10.   SRI. PAWAN S. SHETTY
      S/O N. SUDHAKARA SHETTY
      AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS

11.   SRI. PRAJAN S. SHETTY
      S/O N. SUDHAKARA SHETTY
      AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS

      RESPONDENTS NO. 8 TO 11 ARE
      RESIDING AT "SHETTY FARMS"
      MUDUPINADKA
      BADAGANNUR VILLAGE
      PUTTUR TALUK
      D.K.DISTRICT-574 201                  ...RESPONDENTS
                            ....
      THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER 47 RULE 1 R/W
SECTION 114 OF CPC PRAYING TO REVIEW THE JUDGMENT PASSED BY
THIS HON'BLE COURT IN WP NO.8924/2018 DATED 09.07.2021
PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-A AND ISSUE SUCH OTHER ORDER OR
DIRECTION AS DEEMED FIT, INCLUDING AN ORDER AS TO COSTS, IN
THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.

     THIS REVIEW PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

                           ORDER

None appeared on 10.03.2023 and 31.03.2023, as also

today. Hence, petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

No costs.

Sd/-

JUDGE SPS