Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 4879 Kant
Judgement Date : 26 July, 2023
-1-
NC: 2023:KHC:26098-DB
WA No. 187 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF JULY, 2023
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR PRASANNA B. VARALE, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL
WRIT APPEAL NO. 187 OF 2023 (LB-BMP)
BETWEEN:
1. THE BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE,
REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER,
NR SQUARE,
BENGALURU - 560 002.
2. THE SPECIAL COMMISSIONER (ESTATES),
BRUHAT BANGALORE
MAHANAGARA PALIKE,
N.R. SQUARE,
BANGALORE - 560 002.
Digitally THE APPELLANTS ARE
signed by
SUMA B N REPRESENTED BY
Location: SRI CHANDRASHEKAR PATIL,
High Court HEAD OF THE LEGAL CIVIL CELL AND
of Karnataka DELEGATED AUTHORITY,
BBMP,
BENGALURU.
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. SANJEEV B L., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. KIRLOSKAR ELECTRIC COMPANY EMPLOYEES
-2-
NC: 2023:KHC:26098-DB
WA No. 187 of 2023
HOUSING CO - OP. SOCIETY (REGD.),
HAVING ITS REGD. OFFICE
AT NO.779-A,
N. GANGANARASIAH ROAD,
5TH STAGE, KIRLOSKAR LAYOUT,
HESARAGHATTA ROAD,
NAGASANDRA POST,
BANGALORE - 560 073.
REPRESENTED BY ITS
SECRETARY,
SRI. RAGHAVENDRA,
S/O LATE SRI SRINIVASACHAR,
AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS.
2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,
REPRESENTED BY ITS
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT,
VIKASA SOUDHA,
BENGALURU - 560 001.
3. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,
KUMARAPARK WEST,
BENGALURU - 560 020.
REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.R.ANIL KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR C/R1;
SRI.S.S.MAHENDRA, AGA FOR R2)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED
26/09/2022 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE IN WP
-3-
NC: 2023:KHC:26098-DB
WA No. 187 of 2023
NO.65620/2016 AND CONSEQUENTLY DISMISS THE SAID
WRIT PETITION.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING,
THIS DAY, CHIEF JUSTICE DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellants submits that as
the appellants were not possessing certain documents on
which they could have substantiated the claim, the
appellants are seeking liberty for production of these
documents. Now if this submission is considered, it can
safely be said that when the learned Single Judge passed
the order on 26.09.2022 those documents were not before
the learned Single judge and as such on this count there is
hardly any scope to entertain the appeal.
2. At this stage, the learned counsel for the
appellant prays for withdrawal of the appeal with liberty to
file proper proceedings before the learned Single Judge in
the nature of review petition or application for modification
of the order as the case may be.
NC: 2023:KHC:26098-DB WA No. 187 of 2023
Accordingly, the appeal is disposed as withdrawn
with liberty as prayed for.
Sd/-
CHIEF JUSTICE
Sd/-
JUDGE
RKA
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!