Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

S.Lakshmi W/O Parameshappa vs Y. Suresh Kumar S/O H. Yallanna
2023 Latest Caselaw 4619 Kant

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 4619 Kant
Judgement Date : 18 July, 2023

Karnataka High Court
S.Lakshmi W/O Parameshappa vs Y. Suresh Kumar S/O H. Yallanna on 18 July, 2023
Bench: Anil B Katti
                                                    -1-
                                                            NC: 2023:KHC-D:7431
                                                           CRL.RP No. 100320 of 2019




                                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

                                            DHARWAD BENCH

                                  DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF JULY, 2023

                                                 BEFORE
                                  THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ANIL B KATTI
                         CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 100320 OF 2019 (397)
                       BETWEEN:

                       S. LAKSHMI, W/O PARAMESHAPPA,
                       AGE: 41 YEARS, OCC: WORKING AS
                       ASSISTANCE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER,
                       VIMS HOSPITAL BALLARI,
                       R/O: WORKING AS ASSISTANCE
                       ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER,
                       VIMS HOSPITAL BALLARI,
                       TQ AND DIST: BALLARI-583104
                                                                        ...PETITIONER

                       (BY SRI. B ANWAR BASHA, ADVOCATE)

                       AND:

                       Y. SURESH KUMAR S/O H. YALLANNA
          Digitally
          signed by
          ANNAPURNA
                       AGE: 45 YEARS,
ANNAPURNA CHINNAPPA    R/O: VATTAPAGERI, DOOR NO.16,
CHINNAPPA DANDAGAL
DANDAGAL  Date:
          2023.07.21   WARD NO.28, COWL BAZAAR BALLARI,
          12:46:53 -
          0700         DIST: BALLARI, PIN-583102.

                                                                       ...RESPONDENT

                       (BY SRI. M. AMAREGOUDA , ADVOCATE)

                              THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S 397 R/W
                       401 OF CR.P.C. SEEKING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS ON THE FILE
                       OF 2ND ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BALLARI IN
                       CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.24/2018 AND ON THE FILE OF 2ND ADDL.
                       CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C, BALLARI IN C.C.NO.609/2016 PERUSE
                                     -2-
                                               NC: 2023:KHC-D:7431
                                              CRL.RP No. 100320 of 2019




THE SAME AND SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT OF CONVICTION AND
SENTENCE PASSED BY THE LEARNED 2ND ADDL. DISTRICT AND
SESSIONS JUDGE, BALLARI IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.24/2018
DATED 31/10/2019 AND THE JUDGMENT OF CONVICTION AND
SENTENCE PASSED BY THE LEARNED 2ND ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND
J.M.F.C., BALLARI IN C.C.NO.609/2016, DATED 17/04/2018 OF
SEC.138 OF NI ACT AND SET THE PETITIONER AT LIBERTY.

       THIS    CRIMINAL   REVISION        PETITION,    COMING   ON   FOR
HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

                              ORDER

Revision petitioner/accused - Smt. Lakshmi w/o

Parameshappa with her learned counsel Shri B.Anwar Basha,

present. Respondent- Shri Y. Suresh Kumar s/o H.Yallanna,

along with his learned counsel, Shri M.Amaregouda, present.

2. Heard both sides on the application filed under

Section 320 of Cr.P.C. read with Section 147 of the Negotiable

Instruments Act seeking permission to compound the offence.

It is reported that the matter is amicably settled between the

parties and the accused has paid the settled amount of

Rs.2,25,000/-. Out of the said amount, Rs.1,24,000/- has

been deposited before the trial Court and complainant

acknowledges the receipt of Rs.1,01,000/-.

NC: 2023:KHC-D:7431 CRL.RP No. 100320 of 2019

3. Revision petitioner and respondent are identified by

their respective counsel.

4. Revision petitioner undertakes to deposit the

litigation expenses of Rs.10,000/- as ordered by trial Court.

5. The Court has enquired the parties in open Court

and both of them submit that they have amicably settled the

matter and they have no objection to allow the application.

The Court is satisfied that the parties have agreed to compound

the offence on their own wish and will.

6. In view of the decision of Hon'ble Apex Court in

DAMODAR S. PRABHU VS. SAYED BABALAL H, reported in

AIR 2010 SC 1907, when compounding is permitted at the

appellate stage, the cost has to be imposed. It is true that

when the matter is compounded at the appellate stage, 15% of

the cheque amount will have to be imposed as cost and the

cost so imposed has to be deposited to the Legal Services

Authority.

7. The Hon'ble Apex Court after laying down guidelines

has given discretion to the concerned Court to reduce the cost

by recording reasons. In the present case, accused submits

NC: 2023:KHC-D:7431 CRL.RP No. 100320 of 2019

that she is working as a group 'D' employee in BIMS Hospital,

Ballari. Parties are litigating before this Court since 2016.

Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case and the

reasons stated above, if costs of Rs.2,000/- is imposed, then it

will meet ends of justice. Hence, I proceed to pass the

following:

ORDER

Application filed under Section 320 of the Code of

Criminal Procedure read with Section 147 of the Negotiable

Instrument Act is hereby allowed.

The parties are permitted to compound the offence under

Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act subject to the

condition that accused shall deposit Rs.10,000/- litigation

expenses as ordered by the trial Court within a period of three

weeks from today.

Accused shall also pay costs of Rs.2,000/- to the Legal

Services Authority of this Court within same period.

NC: 2023:KHC-D:7431 CRL.RP No. 100320 of 2019

In view of acceptance of compounding of offence between

the parties, the judgment of trial Court and First Appellate

Court are set-aside.

In terms of the above, the Criminal Revision Petition is

ordered to be disposed of.

Learned counsel for revision petitioner has to report the

compliance of the order within four weeks.

Complainant is permitted to withdraw the amount

deposited in the trial Court.

The registry is directed to transmit the records with the

copy of this judgment to trial Court.

(Sd/-) JUDGE

JM/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter