Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Jaki Recreation Association vs The State Of Karnataka
2023 Latest Caselaw 4499 Kant

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 4499 Kant
Judgement Date : 17 July, 2023

Karnataka High Court
Jaki Recreation Association vs The State Of Karnataka on 17 July, 2023
Bench: Pradeep Singh Yerur
                                                 -1-
                                                        NC: 2023:KHC-D:7295
                                                            WP No. 104268 of 2023




                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH

                                DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JULY, 2023

                                               BEFORE

                            THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR

                            WRIT PETITION NO. 104268 OF 2023 (GM-POLICE)

                       BETWEEN:

                       JAKI RECREATION ASSOCIATION,
                       HEAD OFFICE AT: NAVALGUND-580 029,
                       BRANCH AT: H.NO. 231, PALA PANCHAYAT,
                       TQ: MUNDAGOD, DIST: UTTAR KANADA-581 349,
                       REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT,
                       SHRI NINGANGOUDA
                       S/O. RUDRAGOUDA KANKANWAD,
                       AGE: 50 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS,
                       R/AT: SHIGGAON, TQ: SHIGGAON, DIST: HAVERI-
                       581 193.
                                                                 ...PETITIONER
                       (BY SRI GOURISHANKAR H. MOT, ADVOCATE)

                       AND:
VIJAYALAKSHMI
M KANKUPPI


Digitally signed by
VIJAYALAKSHMI M
KANKUPPI
                       1.   THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,
Location: High Court
of Karnataka,
Dharwad
                            REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,
                            HOME DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA,
                            DR. B. R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
                            BENAGALURU-560 007.

                       2.   THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,
                            UTTAR KANNADA-581 336.

                       3.   THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,
                            SIRSI, DIST: UTTAR KANNADA-581 402.
                              -2-
                                    NC: 2023:KHC-D:7295
                                       WP No. 104268 of 2023




4.   POLICE INSPECTOR,
     MUNDAGOD POLICE STATION,
     TQ: MUNDAGOD,
     DIST: UTTAR KANNADA-581 349.
                                             ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI PRASHANT V. MOGALI, HCGP)

     THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226
AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE
A WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT,
ORDER OR DIRECTIONS, DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS NO. 4
NOT TO INSIST UPON THE PETITIONER TO OBTAIN THE
LICENSE TO CARRY IN LAWFUL ACTIVITIES PERTAINING TO
THE PETITIONER'S ASSOCIATION, BRANCH AT: H.NO.231,
PALA PANCHAYAT, TQ: MUNDAGOD, DIST: UTTAR KANNADA-
581 349 EITHER UNDER THE LICENSING AND CONTROLLING
OF THE PLACES OF PUBLIC ENTERTAINMENT AMUSEMENT ACT
OR UNDER KARNATAKA POLICE ACT AND NOT TO INTERFERE
IN THE PLAY OF SKILL DART GAMES LIKE CRICKET, KABADI,
KARATE, CAROM, CHESS, SNOOKER, VOLLEYBALL, RUMMY
(NON GAMBLING), CARDS GAMES ETC., WHICH ARE THE
GAMES OF SKILL.

    THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY
HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

                           ORDER

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and

learned HCGP representing the respondents.

2. This petition is filed by the petitioner seeking writ of

mandamus by way of directions to the 4th respondent not

to insist upon the petitioner to obtain license to carry on

lawful activities and not to interfere in the game of skill

NC: 2023:KHC-D:7295 WP No. 104268 of 2023

dart games like cricket, kabaddi, karate, carom, chess,

snooker, volleyball, rummy (non gambling), cards and

games etc.

3. Petitioner is a Association under the name of Jaki

Recreation Association registered under the Karnataka

Societies Registration Act, 1960 vide registration

No.DRDW/SOR/ 613/2022-2023 dated 30.12.2022.

Petitioner association provides for its members religious

gatherings, philosophical discussions and other sports

activities like cricket, kabaddi, karate, carom, chess,

snooker, volleyball, rummy (non gambling), cards, games

and etc., It is the grievance of the petitioner that

respondent No.4 started insisting the petitioner to obtain

license under the provisions of Karnataka Police Act, 1963

and also under the license of controlling of places of public

amusement order. Whereas, respondents have given

ultimatum and warning to close down the Association

otherwise they would lock the premises. Therefore,

petitioner is before this Court due to the high handedness

NC: 2023:KHC-D:7295 WP No. 104268 of 2023

and arbitrary manner of respondent Nos.2 to 4 are trying

to close down the Association or restrain them from

conducting their legal activities in the Association.

4. Learned HCGP for respondents contends that no such

coercion or force has been made to the petitioner-

Association to obtain license and sign any documents nor

interfere with the activities of the petitioner-Association.

He further contends that the respondents being the

jurisdictional Police authorities are visiting the Association

to monitor whether any illegal or unlawful activities are

being conducted in the petitioner-Association. Apart from

that there is no intention of the respondents either in

coercing the petitioner from obtaining the license to those

activities which are not required to be obtained by law, or

in any other manner whatsoever. Hence, he contends that

this petition is premature. As no such order has been

issued or given to the petitioner to obtain license or to

shut down the premises run by the petitioner.

NC: 2023:KHC-D:7295 WP No. 104268 of 2023

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner relies on the

judgment of this Court in the case of Blue Line Video

Games Associates, Bangalore Vs. State of Karnataka

and others reported in (2013) 2 KLJ 177.

6. Admittedly, petitioner is a Association registered

under the Karnataka Societies Registration Act, 1960

having registered under the Karnataka Societies

Registration Act in accordance with law has been running

certain activities in the Association and also imparting

recreation and sports activities to the members of the

Association, entry is restricted to the members of the

Association. The members of the Association are involved

in playing games as stated above. When the petitioner is

not involved in conducting or running any unlawful

activities in the Association, the respondent Nos.2 to 4

cannot insist upon them to obtain license or permission for

those games and sports activities for which no license is

required under law. Of-course, it is necessary for the

petitioner to obtain license to run any of the

NC: 2023:KHC-D:7295 WP No. 104268 of 2023

activities/sports for which any license is prescribed under

the law.

7. Learned counsel has also relied upon the judgment of

this Court in the case of Kings Social Club Handigund

Vs. State of Karnataka, in W.P.NO.105936/2022 dated

16.12.2022, wherein this Court in similarly situated

circumstances has issued certain guidelines to the writ

petitioner therein. Admittedly, on query to the petitioner's

counsel, there is no installation of CCTV camera in the

Association premises and she also submits that the entry

to the club is restricted only to the members of the club by

way of issue of identity cards and persons who are not

members are not permitted to enter into the club.

Therefore, the contention of the petitioner that the

respondents are insisting to obtain necessary license to

run the Association belonging to the petitioner would have

to close down the Association is to be seen from the angle

of whether the petitioner is running illegal and unlawful

activities in the Association and if no such activities are

NC: 2023:KHC-D:7295 WP No. 104268 of 2023

being run by the petitioner, petitioner is entitled to run the

Association without any license for sports activities as per

law.

8. The guidelines issued in paragraph 2 of the above

said order are as under-

"(i) The petitioner shall install CC TV cameras at all the places of access to its members and also at all the places, wherein game(s) is/are played by the members within a period of six weeks. The CC TV footage of atleast prior 15 days' period shall be made available by the petitioner to the jurisdiction police, as and when called upon to do so.

(ii) The petitioner shall issue identity card(s) to all its member(s), which shall be produced by the member(s), when called upon by the concerned police, during the raid(s), surveillance, etc.

(iii) The petitioner shall not allow any non-member(s) or the guest(s) of the member(s) to make use of its premises for the purpose of playing any kind of games or recreational activities.

(iv) The petitioner shall not permit any activity by any of its member(s), by indulging in acts of amusement, falling within the definition of Ss.2(14) & 2(15) of the Act and shall not permit any game(s) of chance as per explanation (II) of Sub- section (7) of Section 2 of Karnataka Police Act, 1963. The member(s) shall not be allowed to play any kind of game(s) with stakes or make any profit or gain out of the game(s) played.

(v) The petitioner shall put proper mechanism in place and shall ensure that no game(s) is played in any unlawful manner by the member(s). If the jurisdiction police find that the game(s) played is/are contrary to any law and in violation of the settled practice, it is open to them to take action against the petitioner and the offenders, in accordance with law.

NC: 2023:KHC-D:7295 WP No. 104268 of 2023

(vi) The jurisdictional police shall have liberty to visit premises periodically and/or on receipt of any information about any unlawful activity being carried on in the petitioner's premises.

(vii) The respondents are directed not to interfere with the lawful recreational activities carried on by the members of the petitioner's-Club/Association.

(viii) It is made clear that this order would not come in the way of the jurisdictional police invoking the provisions of the Act and taking action in accordance with law, if the member(s) of the petitioner is/are found to have indulged in any unlawful or immoral activities."

No order as to costs."

9. Accordingly, I pass the following:

ORDER

(i) Petition is partly allowed.

            (ii)   The     respondents         shall    not      insist

     upon    the    petitioner      to    obtain       license,    for

conducting lawful legal activities which does not

require licence to be obtained for running or

conducting any of the games in the

petitioner/Association.

(iii) However, it is made clear that the

respondents who are the agency of the State

cannot be restrained from conducting inspection

NC: 2023:KHC-D:7295 WP No. 104268 of 2023

or enquiry by visiting the Recreation Association

of the petitioner to monitor if there are any

illegal unlawful activities which call for licence to

be obtained and if such visit is made by the

respondents, petitioner shall permit them to

inspect and conduct the enquiry as

contemplated under Section 78 of Karnataka

Police Act, 1963.

Sd/-

JUDGE

CKK

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter