Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 3948 Kant
Judgement Date : 4 July, 2023
-1-
NC: 2023:KHC:22999
RFA No. 1592 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF JULY, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE H.B.PRABHAKARA SASTRY
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1592 OF 2017 (INJ)
BETWEEN:
Sri D Logan
S/O Late Duraiswamy Reddy
Aged About 61 Years,
Residing At No.17,
7th Main 80 Feet Road,
H.R.B.R. Layout, Ii Block,
Kalyana Nagar,
Bangalore-560 043.
...Appellant
(By Sri. Surendra Kumar N.,Advocate)
AND:
Sri Jagadish
Digitally signed
by S/O Sri Govindaswamy,
BHARATHIDEVI
K KORLAHALLI
Location: High
Aged About 43 Years,
Court of
Karnataka Residing At
No.35/1, PNS Layout,
2nd Cross, Muniswamyappa Road,
Subbanpalya Extension
Bangalore-560 033.
...Respondent
(By Sri. K R Bhardwaj & Assts., Advocate)
This Regular First Appeal is filed under Section 96 of the
Civil Procedure Code, praying to call for the entire records and
set aside the judgment and decree passed by the XX Addl.City
Civil and Sessions Judge (CCH-32) passed in O.S.No.3535/2012
-2-
NC: 2023:KHC:22999
RFA No. 1592 of 2017
dated 02.06.2017 and thereby allow the appeal by dismiss the
suit of the plaintiff/respondent by allowing the counter claim
filed by the appellant in the interest of justice and equity and
grant such other relief or reliefs as this Hon'ble Court deems fit
in the facts and circumstances and in the interest of justice and
equity.
This Regular First Appeal coming on for Orders through
Physical Hearing/Video Conferencing, this day, the Court made
the following:
ORDER
None appear in the matter either physically or
through Video Conference.
2. A perusal of the order sheet would go to show that
this appeal is of the year 2017 and seeking early hearing
of this appeal, the appellant has filed an application i.e.,
IA.No.2/2018 under Section 151 of Code of Civil
Procedure, as long back as on 19.04.2018. Since then, no
urgency is shown on the said application.
3. On the previous date of hearing i.e., on
20.02.2020, none appeared in this matter. It is
thereafter, after three years five months, the matter is
being listed, still, there is no representation from either
side in the matter. This itself would go to show that the
appellant is not only not interested in proceeding with the
NC: 2023:KHC:22999 RFA No. 1592 of 2017
matter, but, also not even interested in proceeding on
IA.No.2/2018. As such, when the appellant himself is not
evincing interest for early hearing, there is no point in
allowing IA.No.2/2018.
4. As such, the said application IA.No.2/2018 stands
dismissed.
5. Further, in view of non-prosecution, the Appeal
also stands dismissed.
Consequently, the pending IA.No.1/2019 does not
survive for consideration.
Sd/-
JUDGE
bk
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!