Chinnappa Died By Lrs vs Krishnoji Rao Died By Lrs
2023 Latest Caselaw 959 Kant

                            1



    IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

       DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2023

                          BEFORE

           THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P. SANDESH

                 R.S.A.NO.913/2018 (DEC)

BETWEEN:

   CHINNAPPA
   DIED BY LRS

1 . SMT. KRISHNAMMA
    W/O LATE CHINNAPPA
    AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS

2 . SRINIVASA
    S/O LATE CHINNAPPA
    AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS

3 . VENKATARAMANAPPA
    S/O LATE CHINNAPPA
    AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS

4 . PARVATHAMMA
    D/O LATE CHINNAPPA
    AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS

5 . LOKESH
    S/O LATE CHINNAPPA
    AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS

6 . MUNIYAPPA
    S/O LATE CHINNAPPA
    AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS
                              2




   ALL ARE R/A OLD TANDAVADI ROAD
   MALUR TALUK
   KOLAR DISTRICT-563130

7 . SMT. NEELAMMA
    D/O LATE CHINNAPPA
    AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS
    R/A VEERAPURA VILLAGE
    KASABA HOBLI, MALUR TALUK
    KOLAR DISTRICT-563130
                                    ... APPELLANTS

[BY SRI RASHEED KHAN, ADVOCATE]


AND:

   KRISHNOJI RAO
   DIED BY LRS

1 . LAKSHMIBAI
    W/O LATE KRISHNOJI RAO
    AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS

2 . SURESH RAO
    S/O LATE KRISHNOJI RAO
    AGED ABOUT MAJOR

   BOTH NO.1 & 2 ARE
   R/A CHICKUNTHUR VILLAGE
   TEKAL HOBLI, MALUR TALUK
   KOLAR DISTRICT-563130

3 . THE SECRETARY
    PLD BANK, MALUR
    KOLAR DISTRICT-563130
                              3



4 . THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF
    CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES
    KOLAR-5630130

   YELLAPPA DIED BY LRS

5 . SMT. MUNIYAMMA
    W/O LATE YELLAPPA
    AGED ABOUT 84 YEARS

6 . ANJAPPA
    S/O LATE YELLAPPA
    AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS
    R/A PUJARANAHALLI VILLAGE
    YELASANDRA POST
    MUTHANUR GATE
    BUDIKOTE HOBLI
    BANGARPET TALUK
    KOLAR DISTRICT

7 . SMT. RATHNAMMA
    D/O LATE YELLAPPA
    AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
    R/AT NO KEMBODI VILLAGE
    VADAGUR HOBLI
    KOLAR TALUK AND DISTRICT

8 . MUNIYAPPA DIED BY LRS
    SRI NARAYANASWAMY
    S/O A K MUNIYAPPA
    AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS
    R/A NO ARALERI VILLAGE
    KASABA HOBLI
    MALUR TALUK
    KOLAR DISTRICT
                               4



9 . VENKATESHAPPA DIED BY LRS

(i)   SHARADAMMA W/O LATE VENKATAPPA

(ii) RAVICHANDRA
     S/O LATE VENKATESHAPPA

(iii) SHRUTHI
      D/O LATE VENKATESHAPPA
      W/O MUNIRAJU

      ALL ARE R/AT PATTANUGUR AGRAHAR
      BEHIND ITPL WHITEFIELD
      BENGALURU.

10 . SMT. SHANTHAMMA
     D/O LATE A K MUNYAPPA
     AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS
     R/A JANGAMASIGEHALLI VILALGE
     MUTHENAHALLI POST
     KAIVAR HOBLI
     CHINTAMANI TALUK
     CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT

11 . ANJANEYA REDDY DIED BY LRS
     SMT. DEVI
     D/O LATE ANJANEYA REDDY
     AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS

12 . SMT. UMA DEVI
     D/O LATE ANJENEYA REDDY
     AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS

      BOTH ARE R/AT KATTERI
      SONNEHALLI VILLAGE
      KASABA HOBLI
      MALUR TALUK
      KOLAR DISTRICT
                               5



13 . SMT. THILAKA
     D/O LATE ANJENEYA REDDY
     AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS
     R/A TYPIST
     FIRST GRADE COLLEGE
     OORGAUM, KGF.

14 . VIJAYALAKSHMI
     W/O KESHAVAR REDDY
     AGED ABOUT MAJOR
     R/A DODDA KADATHUR
     MALUR TALUK

15 . S.A.DAYANANDA REDDY
     S/O S.ANJANERA REDDY
     AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS
     R/A SONNENAHALLI VILALGE
     MALUR TALUK
     KOLAR DISTRICT

16 . S A BHANUMATHI
     S/O S A ANJANEYA REDDY
     AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS
     R/A SONNEHALLI VILLAGE
     MALUR TALUK
     KOLAR DISTRICT
                                      ... RESPONDENTS

     THIS R.S.A. IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 24.01.2018
PASSED IN R.A.NO. 143/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE III
ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, KOLAR (SITTING AT KGF),
DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGEMENT
AND DECREE DTD 02.09.2014 PASSED IN OS.NO.448/1997 ON
THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AT KGF.

    THIS R.S.A. COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
                               6




                      JUDGMENT

This appeal was filed in the year 2018. This Court,

vide order dated 23.10.2021 granted two weeks' time to

comply with the office objections and also made it clear that

failing which, list this matter for dismissal. Even though

two weeks' time was granted on 23.10.2021, the office

objections are not complied. Hence, the appeal is dismissed

for non-compliance of office objections.

Sd/-

JUDGE

SN