Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 901 Kant
Judgement Date : 13 January, 2023
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P. SANDESH
R.S.A.NO.431/2018 (DEC/INJ)
BETWEEN:
JAYARAMA REDDY
SINCE DEAD BY LRs
S/O. LATE PATEL KASHAVA REDDY
1. SMT. GOWRAMMA
W/O. LATE JAYARAM REDDY
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS
2. SMT. KAVERAMMA
D/O. LATE JAYARAMA REDDY
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS
3. SRI ERAPPA REDDY
S/O. LATE PATEL KESHAVA REDDY
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS
4. SRI REDDAPPA
S/O. LATE PATEL KESHAVA REDDY
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
ALL ARE R/O.B.K.HALLI VILLAGE
NAGALAMADIKE HOBLI
PAVAGADA TALUK
TUMAKURU DISTRICT-572 112. ... APPELLANTS
[BY SRI PUNEETH K., ADVOCATE]
2
AND:
1 . SMT. GANGAMMA
W/O. LATE SANJEEVA REDDY
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS
2 . SRI RAMESH REDDY
S/O. LATE SANJEEVA REDDY
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS
3 . SRI ESWARA REDDY
S/O. LATE SANJEEVA REDDY
AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS
4 . SRI LAKSHMAN REDDY
S/O. LATE NADUPI HANUMA REDDY
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS
5 . SRI VIRUPAKSHA REDDY
S/O. LATE NADIPI HANUMA REDDY
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS
6 . SRI GOVIND REDDY
S/O. LATE NADIPI HANUMA REDDY
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS
7 . SRI NAGI REDDY
S/O. LATE NADIPI HANUMA REDDY
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS
8 . SRIPATHY REDDY
S/O. LATE NADIPI HANUMA REDDY
AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS
9 . SMT. THIPPAMMA
W/O. LATE SANNA HANUMREDDY
AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS
3
10 . SRI THIMMA REDDY
S/O. SANNA HANUMREDDY
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
11 . SRI RAMA REDDY
S/O. SANNA HANUMREDDY
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS
12 . SRI NARAYANA REDDY
S/O. SANNA HANUMAREDDY
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS
13 . SRI VENKATA REDDY
S/O. SANNA HANUMAREDDY
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS
14 . SRI HANUMANTHA REDDY
S/O. SANNA HANUMAREDDY
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS
15 . SRI PRAKASH REDDY
S/O. SANNA HANUMAREDDY
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS
THE RESPONDENT NOS.1 TO 15 ARE
RESIDING AT B.K.HALLY VILLAGE
NAGALAMADIKE HOBLI
PAVAGADA TALUK
TUMAKURU DISTRICT-572 112.
... RESPONDENTS
THIS R.S.A IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC,
AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED 10.08.2017
PASSED IN R.A.NO.114/2009 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR
CIVIL JUDE AND JMFC, PAVAGADA, DISMISSING THE APPEAL
AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED
10.07.2009 PASSED IN O.S.NO.230/2003 ON THE FILE OF THE
CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN) AND JMFC, PAVAGADA.
4
THIS R.S.A. COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
This Court vide order dated 25.02.2022, as a last chance,
granted one week time to comply with the office objections and
also made it clear that, if the office objections are not complied
with, the appeal would be dismissed for non-prosecution.
Inspite of almost 11 months having been elapsed, till date, the
office objections are not complied with.
Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/-
JUDGE
ST
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!