Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 757 Kant
Judgement Date : 11 January, 2023
-1-
RFA No. 1099 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1099 OF 2018 (PAR)
BETWEEN:
SRI.SRINIVASAPPA
S/O LATE CHOWDAPPA
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
RESIDING AT KAJI SONNENAHALLI COLONY,
BIDARAHALLI HOBLI,
BANGALORE EAST TALUK
BANGALORE - 560 067
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. SRIDHAR T., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. SRI. VENKATESH
S/O LATE KRISHNAPPA
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS
2. SMT.GOWRAMMA
Digitally D/O LATE KRISHNAPPA
signed by AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS
PANKAJA S
Location:
HIGH 3. SRI MANJUNATHA
COURT OF S/O LATE KRISHNAPPA
KARNATAKA
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS
RESPONDENT NO.1 TO 3
RESIDING AT KHDC COLONY,
C - BLOCK 16, SUDHAMANAGARA
ANEKAL TALUK
BANGALORE DISTRICT - 562 106
-2-
RFA No. 1099 of 2018
4. SMT.GOWRAMMA
W/O LATE SHANKARAPPA
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
5. SRI.RAMAKRISHNA
S/O LATE SHANKARAPPA
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS
6. SRI.HEMANTH KUMAR
S/O LATE SHANKARAPPA
AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS
7. SMT.CHANDRIKA
D/O LATE SHANKARAPPA
AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS
RESPONDENT NO.4 TO 7 ARE
R/AT NEAR KSRTC BUS STAND ANEKAL,
BANGALORE DISTRICT - 562 106
8. SRI.KRISHNAPPA
S/O CHINNAMMA & SAMPANGIRAMAIAH
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
RESIDING AT O 243,
HOSUR MAIN ROAD,
3RD CROSS, ASHREYA MANEGALU,
ANEKAL BAZAAR,
BANGALORE DISTRICT - 562 016
9. SRI N.RAJU @ NAGARAJU N.
S/O NAGAPPA
AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS
R/AT NO 69,
MANJUNATHA NILAYA,
MAHADEVAPURA POST,
K.R.PURA HOBLI,
BANGALORE EAST TALUK,
BANGALORE - 560 048
NOW AT
RESIDING AT NO 69, 1ST MAIN,
-3-
RFA No. 1099 of 2018
GARUDACHARPALYA MAIN ROAD,
BANGALORE - 560 048
...RESPONDENTS
THIS RFA FILED UNDER SEC.96 R/W.ORDER 41 RULE 1
AND 2 OF CPC.,1908 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE
DATED 24.03.2018 PASSED IN OS NO.659/2006 ON THE FILE
OF THE PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, BANALORE (R) DISTRICT.
BANGALORE DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR PARTITION AND
SEPARATE POSSESSION AND ETC.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
1. There is no appearance on behalf of the appellant.
2. Office objections have not been complied with though time
was granted on several occasions. Left with no other option, the
appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
SD/-
JUDGE
PKS CT:AN
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!