Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Shri. M. Muniswamy vs Deputy Commissioner
2023 Latest Caselaw 1034 Kant

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1034 Kant
Judgement Date : 18 January, 2023

Karnataka High Court
Shri. M. Muniswamy vs Deputy Commissioner on 18 January, 2023
Bench: Alok Aradhe, S Vishwajith Shetty
                                           -1-
                                                      WA No.404 of 2019




                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
                     DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF JANUARY 2023
                                        PRESENT
                       THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
                                           AND
                   THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. VISHWAJITH SHETTY
                          WRIT APPEAL NO.404 OF 2019 (SC-ST)
              BETWEEN:

              1.   SHRI. M. MUNISWAMY
                   AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS
                   S/O LATE MUTHAPPA @ MUTTUGA
                   RESIDING AT THUBARAHALLI VILLAGE
                   VARTHUR HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK
                   BENGALURU-560 087.
                                                           ...APPELLANT
Digitally signed
by RUPA V        (BY SRI. PRAKASH T. HEBBAR, ADV.,)
Location: High AND:
Court of
Karnataka
              1.   DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
                   BANGALORE DISTRICT
                   K.G. ROAD, BENGALURU-560 009.

              2.   ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER
                   BENGALURU NORTH SUB-DIVISION
                   K.G. ROAD, BENGALURU-560 009.

              3.   SHRI. YELLAPPA
                   AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS
                   S/O SABAPATHI
                   MUNNEKOLALU VILLAGE
                   VARTHUR HOBLI
                   BANGALORE EAST TALUK
                   BENGALURU-560 087.

              4.   M/S. M.M. BHATIA & COMPANY
                   NO.4406, HIGH POINT IV
                           -2-
                                        WA No.404 of 2019




     NO.45, PALACE ROAD
     BENGALURU-560 001
     REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR
     M.M. BHATIA
     AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS
     S/O LATE MOTUMAL BHATIA.

5.   SHRI. G.M. RAMACHANDRA
     S/O LATE G.M. MARIYAPPA
     AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
     RESIDING AT NO.11, 16TH "E" MAIN
     HAL II STAGE, BENGALURU-560 008.

6.   SMT. A. JAYASHREE
     W/O G.M. RAMACHANDRA
     AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS
     RESIDING AT NO.11, 16TH "E" MAIN
     HAL II STAGE, BENGALURU-560 008.

7.   SHRI. R. KOTHANDRAMAN
     S/O N.M. RAJAGOPALAN
     AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
     RESIDING AT NO. 217, GEM VILLA
     HAPPY VALLEY, WHITEFIELD
     BENGALURU-560 066.

8.   SMT. SHEELA KOTHANDARAMAN
     W/O R. KOTHANDARAMAN
     AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS
     RESIDING AT NO.217
     GEM VILLA, HAPPY VALLEY
     WHITEFIELD, BENGALURU-560 066.

9.   SHRI. K. ISMAIL
     S/O LATE MOHAMMED
     AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
     NO.789, 2ND CROSS
     CHOWDESHWARI LAYOUT
     BENGALURU-560 037.

10. SHRI. HARIS KALLAI
    S/O C.A. ASSOO
                           -3-
                                       WA No.404 of 2019




    AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
    P.O. BOX NO. 103, ELENCO
    ABUDABI-USE.

11. SHRI. N.K. KOTESWARAN
    S/O LATE KACHIYAPPAN
    AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS
    RESIDING AT NO. 234
    3RD MAIN, 2ND CROSS
    FERNS CITY, DODDANEKKUNDI
    OUTER RING ROAD, MARATHAHALLI
    BENGALURU-560 037.

12. SMT. KARPAGASELVI
    W/O SANJAYA KOTESHWARAN
    AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
    RESIDING AT NO. 234
    3RD MAIN, 2ND CROSS
    FERNS CITY, DODDANEKKUNDI
    OUTER RING ROAD, MARATHAHALLI
    BENGALURU-560 037.

13. M/S. SRI. MEENAKSHI BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS
    NO.252, PRASHANTI NILAYAM
    ROAD NO.2, BANJARA HILLS
    HYDERABAD-500 004
    REPTD. BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER
    MR. J. NAGIREDDY.
                                      ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. RAMESH J.C. ADV., FOR C/R4
    SRI. LAXMI NARAYANA, AGA FOR R1 & R2
    SRI. S.K. VENKATACHALAPATHI, ADV., FOR R5-R10
    SRI. R. SHARADAMBA, ADV., FOR R11 & R12)

     THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED
12.12.2018 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE IN
W.P.NOS.45091-92/2012 (SC/ST) AND CONFIRM THE ORDER
DATED 15.12.2006 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 IN
CASE NO.KSC.ST.83/2004-05 AT ANNEXURE 'E' IN W.P.
NOS.45091-92/2012.
                           -4-
                                        WA No.404 of 2019




    THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ALOK ARADHE J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

                      JUDGMENT

This intra Court appeal has been filed against

order dated 12.12.2018 by which the writ petition

preferred by the appellant has been dismissed.

2. Facts giving rise to filing of this appeal briefly

stated are that the father of the appellant is granted 2

acres of land bearing Sy.No.7/4 situated at Toobarahalli

Village, Varthur Hobli, Bengaluru East Taluk, on

10.12.1940. The aforesaid lands were alienated in the

years 1965 and 1968. After a period of 26 years, an

application under the provisions of the Karnataka

Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prohibition of

Transfer of Certain Lands) Act, 1978 (hereinafter

referred to as 'the Act') was filed seeking resumption of

the land. The aforesaid application was allowed by the

Assistant Commissioner by an order dated 02.05.2011.

WA No.404 of 2019

The order dated 02.05.2011 was set aside by the Deputy

Commissioner in an appeal. The appellant challenged

the aforesaid order in a writ petition before the learned

Single Judge who by an order dated 12.12.2018, has

dismissed the petition. In the aforesaid factual

background, this appeal has been filed.

3. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted

that the learned Single Judge grossly erred in

dismissing the writ petition.

4. We have considered the submissions made by

the learned counsel for the parties and have perused the

record. The Supreme Court in NEKKANTI RAMA

LAKSHMI Vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA AND OTHERS1

has held that Section 5 of the Karnataka Scheduled

Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prohibition of Transfer of

Certain Lands) Act, 1978 (hereinafter referred to as 'the

(2020) 14 SCC 232

WA No.404 of 2019

Act' for short) enables any interested person to make an

application for having the transfer annulled as void

under Section 4 of the Act. The aforesaid Section does

not prescribe for any period of limitation. However, it

has been held that any action whether on an application

of the parties or suo motu, must be taken within a

reasonable period of time. The Supreme Court, in the

aforesaid decision, held that the application seeking

resumption of the land filed after a period of 24 years,

suffered from inordinate delay and was therefore, liable

to be dismissed on that ground. Similar view was taken

by the Supreme Court in VIVEK M.HINDUJA & ANR.

Vs. M.ASHWATHA2 and it was held that whenever

limitation is not prescribed, the party ought to approach

the competent Court or Authority within a reasonable

time beyond which no relief can be granted. In the

aforesaid case, delay of 20 years in filing the application

for resumption was held to be unreasonable.

(2020) 14 SCC 228

WA No.404 of 2019

5. In the instant case, admittedly, the land was

granted in the year 1940 and the same was alienated in

the years 1965 and 1968. After a delay of 26 years from

the enactment of the Act, the application seeking

resumption of the land was filed for which no plausible

explanation has been offered.

For the aforementioned reasons, we do not find

any ground to differ with the view taken by the learned

Single Judge.

In the result, the appeal same fails and is hereby

dismissed.

Sd/-

JUDGE

Sd/-

JUDGE

RV

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter