Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1606 Kant
Judgement Date : 27 February, 2023
-1-
RSA No. 1795 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.1795 OF 2017
BETWEEN:
1. R MANJUNATH
S/O RANGAPPA
AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS
R/AT KALANAYAKANAHATTI
VILLAGE, SRIRAMPURA HOBLI
HOSADURGA TALUK-577527
2. RAJESHWARI
D/O RANGAPPA
W/O BYRALINGAPPA
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS
HOUSEWIFE AND AGRICULTURIST
R/AT HEGGERE VILLAGE
Digitally signed
by SHARANYA T SRIRAMPURA HOBLI
Location: HIGH HOSADURGA TALUK-577527
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
3. SHASHIKALA
D/O RANGAPPA
AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS
HOUSEWIFE AND AGRICULTURIST
R/AT JANNEKAL VILLAGE
SIRA TALUK-572137
TUMKUR DISTICT
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI SATHYANARAYANA K V, ADVOCATE [ABSENT])
-2-
RSA No. 1795 of 2017
AND:
1. SMT NEELAMMA
W/O RANGAPPA
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
R/AT GAREEMBELU VILLAGE
SRIRAMPURA HOBLI
HOSADURGA TALUK-577527
2. SMT. BHAGYAMMA
D/O RANGAPPA
W/O RAMALINGAPPA
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS
R/AT SOPPINAGADULU VILLAGE
SRIRAMPURA HOBLI
HOSADURGA TALUK-577527
3. SMT. ANASUYAMMA
D/O RANGAPPA
W/O NARASIMHAMURTHY
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS
HOUSEWIFE AND AGRICULTURIST
4. SMT. CHANDRAPPA
D/O RANGAPPA
W/O MAHALINGAPPA
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS
RESPONDENT No.3 AND 4 ARE
R/AT DODDA KARAPURADA KATTE
VILLAGE, MATHODU HOBLI
HOSADURGA TALUK-577527
5. RANGAPPA
S/O LATE DASAPPA
AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS
-3-
RSA No. 1795 of 2017
R/AT KALANAYAKANAHATTI
VILLAGE
SRIRAMPURA HOBLI
HOSADURGA TALUK-577527
6. D THIMMAIAH
S/O LATE DASAPPA
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS
7. ANANTHAPPA
S/O LATE DASAPPA
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS
8. LAKKAPPA
S/O LATE DASAPPA
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
RESPONDENT No.6 TO 8 ARE
R/AT GAREEMBELU VILLAGE
SRIRAMPURA HOBLI
HOSADURGA TALUK-577527
...RESPONDENTS
THIS R.S.A. IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 27.09.2016
PASSED IN R.A.NO.13/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR
CIVIL JUDGE AND MACT, HOSADURGA AND ETC.
THIS R.S.A. COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,
THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
-4-
RSA No. 1795 of 2017
JUDGMENT
This Court has issued notice against the
respondents in the year 2019, but PF was not paid and
when the matter was listed in the year 2020, one week
time was granted for furnishing of PF and etc. Again the
matter is listed today for non-furnishing of PF and etc.
This matter is of the year 2017 but till date, the counsel
for the appellants has not taken any steps to issue notice
against the respondents. Hence, it appears that the
counsel for the appellants is not interested in pursuing the
matter diligently. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for
non-prosecution.
Sd/-
JUDGE
SN
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!