Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Imran Pasha vs The State Of Karnataka
2023 Latest Caselaw 1545 Kant

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1545 Kant
Judgement Date : 23 February, 2023

Karnataka High Court
Imran Pasha vs The State Of Karnataka on 23 February, 2023
Bench: K.Natarajan
                                                    -1-
                                                           CRL.P No. 1338 of 2023




                            IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                              DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2023

                                                  BEFORE
                                  THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.NATARAJAN
                                  CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 1338 OF 2023
                       BETWEEN:

                       1.   IMRAN PASHA
                            S/O RAHMATHULLA
                            AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS

                       2.   RAHMATHULLA
                            S/O LATE AMEER SAB
                            AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS

                       3.   SMT AKTHAR @ AKTHARUNISSA
                            W/O RAHMATHULLA
                            AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS

                       4.   BHIBHI JAAN
                            W/O MOWLA
                            AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS

                            CORRECT NAME AND ADDRESS SMT FARAHANA
                            D/O RAHAMATHULLA
                            AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS
                            RESIDING AT SANTHEKALLAHALLI POST
Digitally signed by
SHOBHA C
                            VAIZAKURU POST
Location: High Court        CHICKABALLAPUR DISTRICT
of Karnataka
                            PIN-563128.

                            ALL ARE RESIDING AT
                            MAHAMADPUR VILLAGE
                            CHINTAMANI TALUK
                            CHICKBALLAPUR DISTRICT
                            PIN-563125.
                            PERMANENT ADDRESS VIJAKURU VILLAGE
                            CHINTAMANI TALUK
                            CHICKBALLAPUR DISTRICT
                            PIN-563128

                                                                    ...PETITIONERS
                       (BY SRI. A.S. KULKARNI.,ADVOCATE)
                                   -2-
                                              CRL.P No. 1338 of 2023




AND:

1.   THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
     BY CHINTAMANI RURAL POLICE STATION
     CHINTAMANI-563125
     REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
     HIGH COURT BUILDING
     BANGALORE-560001.

2.   SMT SHAMSHIRA
     W/O IMRAN PASHA
     AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS
     RESIDING AT MAHAMADPUR VILLAGE
     CHINTAMANI TALUK
     CHICKBALLAPUR DISTRICT
     PIN-563125.

                                                      ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. R.D. RENUKARADHYA, HCGP FOR R1
SRI. S.Z. BAREED, ADVOCATE FOR R2)

      THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF
CR.P.C. PRAYING TO QUASH THE CHARGE SHEET AGAINST THE
PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.1 TO 4 IN CHINTAMANI RURAL P.S.,
CHICKBALLAPUR DISTRICT IN CR.NO.493/2019 (C.C.NO.411/2020)
FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 498A,
323, 324, 504, 506 READ WITH SECTION 34 OF IPC AND SECTIONS
3,4 OF D.P ACT ON THE FILE OF THE LEARNED ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE
AND JMFC, CHINTAMANI.

      THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR REPORTING SETTLEMENT,
THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:


                                ORDER

This petition is filed by the petitioner/accused Nos.1 to 4

under section 482 of Cr.P.C for quashing the criminal

proceedings in C.C.No.411/2020 on the file of Addl. Civil Judge

and Judicial Magistrate First Class, Chintamani, pertaining to

Crime No.493/2019 registered by Chintamani Rural Police

CRL.P No. 1338 of 2023

station for the offence punishable under Sections 498A, 323,

324, 504, 506 read with 34 of IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of

Dowry Prohibition Act.

2. During the pendency of this petition, both petitioner

No.1 and respondent No.2 appeared before the Court along

with their counsel and filed joint compromise application in

I.A.No.1/2023 under section 320 read with 482 of Cr.P.C and

are seeking permission of this court to compound the offence.

3. Both petitioner No.1/husbandand respondent No.2/wife

appeared and submits the dispute between them is settled and

the petitioner No.1 has handed over Rs.3.5 lakhs to the

respondent No.2 towards full and final settlement as alimony.

It is submitted that though it is mentioned as Rs.3 lakhs in para

8 of the affidavit, but the DD given to the respondent No.2 is of

Rs.3.5 lakhs and the same is received by respondent No.2 in

presence of her advocate in the court.

4. In view of joint compromise between the parties and

in view of the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case

of Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab and Another reported in

CRL.P No. 1338 of 2023

2012 CRI.L.J.4934, the criminal proceedings required to be

quashed. Hence, I.A.No.1/2023 is allowed and the parties are

permitted to compound the offence.

Accordingly, this petition is allowed.

The proceedings against the petitioners in proceedings in

C.C.No.411/2020 on the file of Addl. Civil Judge and Judicial

Magistrate First Class, Chintamani, pertaining to Crime

No.493/2019 registered by Chintamani Rural Police station, is

hereby quashed.

Sd/-

JUDGE

AKV

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter