Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Smt. Jayamani vs Chikkadasa
2023 Latest Caselaw 1433 Kant

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1433 Kant
Judgement Date : 20 February, 2023

Karnataka High Court
Smt. Jayamani vs Chikkadasa on 20 February, 2023
Bench: H.P.Sandeshpresided Byhpsj
                                              -1-
                                                        RSA No. 491 of 2020




                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                          DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2023

                                            BEFORE

                              THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH

                         REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.491 OF 2020 (PAR)

                   BETWEEN:

                   1.   SMT. JAYAMANI,
                        D/O LATE KENCHAIAH,
                        AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS,
                        R/AT NO.1777, 6TH CROSS,
                        CHRISTIAN COLONY,
                        MANDAYA-574101.

                   2.   SMT. MARIYAMMA,
                        D/O LATE KENCHAIAH,
                        AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS,
                        R/AT NO.1777, 6TH CROSS,
                        CHRISTIAN COLONY,
                        MANDAYA-574101.

Digitally signed
                   3.   SMT. LALITHAMMA,
by SHARANYA T           D/O LATE KENCHAIAH,
Location: HIGH          AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,
COURT OF
KARNATAKA               R/AT NO.1777, 6TH CROSS,
                        CHRISTIAN COLONY,
                        MANDAYA-574101.

                   4.   SMT. DEVAMMA,
                        W/O LATE KENCHAIAH,
                        AGED ABOUT 87 YEARS,
                        R/AT HKV ROAD,
                        VEERANNA GOWDA COLLEGE,
                        CHANNEGOWDANA DODDI,
                        MADDUR TALUK, MANDAYA-574101.

                   5.   SRI PRAKASH C,
                        C/O VASNATHAMMA,
                        W/O LATE PRAKASH,
                          -2-
                                     RSA No. 491 of 2020




     AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,
     R/AT HKV ROAD,
     VEERANNA GOWDA COLLEGE,
     CHANNEGOWDANA DODDI,
     MADDUR TALUK, MANDAYA-574101.
                                           ...APPELLANTS

         (BY SRI GOWRISHANKAR C, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.      CHIKKADASA,
        S/O LATE DASAIAH,
        AGED ABOUT 82 YEARS,
        R/AT CHIKKAMARALLI VILLAGE,
        KANNAGANAMARADI HOBLI,
        PANADAVAPURA TALUK,
        MANDAYA-574101.
        SINCE DEAD REPRESENTED BY HIS LRS

1(a).   SMT. JAYAMMA
        AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS,
        R/AT NEAR CHIKKAMARALLI VILLAGE,
        KANNAGANAMARADI HOBLI,
        PADAVAPURA TALUK,
        MANDAYA-574101.

1(b).   DEVARAJU,
        AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,
        R/AT NEAR CHIKKAMARALLI VILLAGE,
        KANNAGANAMARADI HOBLI,
        PADAVAPURA TALUK,
        MANDAYA-574101.

1(c).   SAVITHRI,
        AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,
        R/AT NEAR CHIKKAMARALLI VILLAGE,
        KANNAGANAMARADI HOBLI,
        PADAVAPURA TALUK,
        MANDAYA-574101.

1(d).   NAGENDRA,
        AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS,
        R/AT NEAR CHIKKAMARALLI VILLAGE,
                             -3-
                                    RSA No. 491 of 2020




        KANNAGANAMARADI HOBLI,
        PADAVAPURA TALUK,
        MANDAYA-574101.

1(e).   CHANDRU,
        AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS,
        R/AT NEAR CHIKKAMARALLI VILLAGE,
        KANNAGANAMARADI HOBLI,
        PADAVAPURA TALUK,
        MANDAYA-574101.

1(f).   KUMARA,
        SINCE DEAD BY LRS

1(f)(a). SMT. MANGALAGOWRI.
         AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS,
         R/AT NEAR CHIKKAMARALLI VILLAGE,
         KANNAGANAMARADI HOBLI,
         PADAVAPURA TALUK,
         MANDAYA-574101.

1(f)(b). KUM. BAGYALAKSHMI,
         AGED ABOUT 15 YEARS,
         R/AT NEAR CHIKKAMARALLI VILLAGE,
         KANNAGANAMARADI HOBLI,
         PADAVAPURA TALUK,
         MANDAYA-574101.

1(f)(c). KUM VIJAYALAKSHMI,
         AGED ABOUT 13 YEARS,
         R/AT NEAR CHIKKAMARALLI VILLAGE,
         KANNAGANAMARADI HOBLI,
         PADAVAPURA TALUK, MANDAYA-574101.
         REPRESENTED BY NATURAL GUARDIAN
         APPELLANT 1(f)(a).

2.      SMT. HONNAMMA,
        WIFE OF LATE CHIKKANNA,
        DEAD BY LRS.

2(a).   SMT. MANGALAMMA,
        AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,
        R/AT NEAR SOLLEPURA VILLAGE,
        MADDUR TALUK, MANDAYA-574101.
                           -4-
                                    RSA No. 491 of 2020




2(b).   BHAVYA,
        AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS,
        R/AT NEAR SOLLEPURA VILLAGE,
        MADDUR TALUK, MANDAYA-574101.

2(c).   PRITHVI,
        AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS,
        R/AT NEAR SOLLEPURA VILLAGE,
        MADDUR TALUK, MANDAYA-574101.

2(d).   RAJAMMA
        W/O MURALI,
        PHYSICAL INSTRUCTOR,
        R/AT NEAR SOLLEPURA VILLAGE,
        MADDUR TALUK, MANDAYA-574101.

3.      SMT. GOWRAMMA,
        W/O LATE CHANNAIAH,
        AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS,
        R/AT NEAR SOLLEPURA VILLAGE,
        MADDUR TALUK, MANDAYA-574101.

4.      B.M. SATHYA,
        S/O LATE MANCHAMMA,
        MAJOR,
        R/AT NEAR CSI,
        CHRISTU JYOTHI CHURCH,
        BESAGARAHALLI VILLAGE,
        MADDUR TALUK, MANDAYA-574101.
                                    ...RESPONDENTS

     THIS R.S.A. IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC
1908, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED
29.07.2019 PASSED IN RA.No.179/2009 ON THE FILE OF THE
PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MANDYA,
DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT
AND DECREE DATED 26.10.2009 PASSED IN OS.No.45/2006
ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DVN) MADDUR.

    THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
                             -5-
                                        RSA No. 491 of 2020




                         JUDGMENT

This Court vide order dated 03.02.2023, granted

two weeks time to comply with the office objections on

payment of cost of Rs.1,000/- payable at the Registry,

failing which to list the matter for dismissal. Inspite of

the same, cost is not paid and the office objections are

also not complied with till date. Hence, the appeal is

dismissed for non-compliance of office objections.

Sd/-

JUDGE

MD

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter