Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1324 Kant
Judgement Date : 15 February, 2023
-1-
WA No.427 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2023
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A PATIL
WRIT APPEAL NO.427 OF 2022 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
1. WORKMEN OF STATE BANK OF INDIA
REPRESENTED BY THE
STATE BANKS STAFF UNION (KARNATAKA)
REPRESENTED SRI. M. RAVIKUMAR
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS
Digitally signed
by RUPA V GENERAL SECRETARY
Location: High STATE BANK OF INDIA
Court of LOCAL HEAD OFFICE NO.65
Karnataka ST. MARKS ROAD, BENGALURU-01.
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. KUTTAPPA B.D. ADV.,)
AND:
1. UNION OF INDIA
REP. BY GENERAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT
MINISTRY OF LABOUR
SHRAM BHAVAN, NEW DELHI.
2. STATE BANK OF INDIA
LOCAL HEAD OFFICE
NO.65, ST. MARKS ROAD
BENGALURU-560001
REP. BY ITS CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER.
3. THE DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER
I CIRCLE DEVELOPMET OFFICER
STATE BANK OF INDIA
LOCAL HEAD OFFICE
NO.65, ST. MARKS ROAD
BENGALURU-560001.
-2-
WA No.427 of 2022
4. THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER
STATE BANK OF INDIA
LOCAL HEAD OFFICE
NO.65, ST. MARKS ROAD
BENGALURU-560001.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. SARAVANA P, CGC FOR R1)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO ALLOW THE WRIT APPEAL AND
SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 05/04/2022 MADE IN WP
NO.24056/2014 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE OF
THIS HON BLE COURT AND ALLOW THE WRIT PETITION.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING,
THIS DAY, ALOK ARADHE J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
This intra Court appeal has been filed against
order dated 05.04.2022 passed by the learned Single
Judge by which the writ petition preferred by the
appellant has been dismissed as infructuous.
2. We have heard the learned counsel for the
appellant at length.
3. The appellant had filed a writ petition seeking
quashment of the decision of the management to close
the canteen of Bangalore Branch of the State Bank of
India. In the writ petition, statement of objections was
WA No.427 of 2022
filed on behalf of the Bank in which it was pointed out
that the decision to merge the canteen that was being
run by the Bangalore Main Branch with local head office
was taken for the reasons assigned in the statement of
objections.
4. In view of the aforesaid stand taken by the Bank
in the statement of objections, the learned Single Judge
has dismissed the petition as infructuous. If the
appellant is aggrieved by the action of the Bank in
merger of the canteen with any other canteen, it would
be open for him to take recourse to such remedy as may
be available to it in law.
With the aforesaid liberty, appeal is disposed of.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE RV
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!