Sri Nagashetty @ Nagappa B.R vs Sri Manja Shetty
2023 Latest Caselaw 1296 Kant

                                                -1-
                                                         RSA No. 388 of 2020




                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                           DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2023

                                            BEFORE

                              THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH

                          REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.388 OF 2020 (PAR)

                   BETWEEN:

                   SRI NAGASHETTY @ NAGAPPA B.R.,
                   S/O B.K. RANGASHETTY,
                   AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS,
                   R/AT NAVILAHALLI VILLAGE,
                   K. HOSAKOTE HOBLI,
                   ALUR TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT.
                                                               ...APPELLANT

                             (BY SRI RAGHAVENDRA H.S., ADVOCATE)

                   AND:

                   1.   SRI MANJA SHETTY,
                        S/O B.K. RANGASHETTY,
                        AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS.
Digitally signed
by SHARANYA T
Location: HIGH     2.   SRI JAGADISHA,
COURT OF
KARNATAKA               S/O B.K. RANGASHETTY,
                        AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS.

                   3.   SRI VENKATESHA,
                        S/O B.K. RANGASHETTY,
                        AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS.

                   4.   SMT. JAYAMMA,
                        W/O NARASIMHA SHETTY,
                        AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS.

                   5.   SRI RAVI,
                        S/O SHIVAPPA,
                        AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS.
                             -2-
                                   RSA No. 388 of 2020




6.   SMT. NETHRA,
     D/O SHIVAPPA,
     AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS.

7.   SMT. RADHA,
     D/O SHIVAPPA,
     AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS.

8.   SMT. SUNANDA,
     D/O SHIVAPPA,
     AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS.

9.   SRI KUMAR,
     S/O CHANDRASHETTY,
     AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS.

10. SMT. KUSUMA,
    D/O CHANDRASHETTY,
    AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS.

11. SMT. RENUKA,
    D/O CHANDRASHETTY,
    AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS.

12. SMT. BHAGYA,
    W/O ANNAPPA,
    AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS.

     R1 TO R12 ARE RESIDING AT
     NAVILAHALLI VILLAGE,
     K. HOSAKOTE T HOBLI,
     ALUR TALUK,
     HASSAN DISTRICT.

13. SMT. YASHODHA,
    W/O THIMMAIAH SHETTY,
    AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS,
    R/AT KATTINA KERE EXTENSION,
    HASSAN TOWN, HASSAN.

14. SRI B.K. SHIVAMMA,
    W/O KRISHNASHETTY,
    AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS,
    R/AT Y.N. PURA VILLAGE,
                              -3-
                                        RSA No. 388 of 2020




     K. HOSAKOTE HOBLI,
     ALUR TALUK,
     HASSAN DISTRICT.
                                           ...RESPONDENTS

     THIS R.S.A. IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC,
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 24.09.2018
PASSED IN RA.NO.13/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, HASSAN, PARTLY ALLOWING THE
APPEAL AND MODIFYING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE
DATED 10.12.2014 PASSED IN O.S.NO.13/2010 ON THE FILE
OF THE CIVIL JUDGE ALUR.

    THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

                         JUDGMENT

This appeal was filed in the year 2020 and this

Court vide order dated 30.01.2023, granted two weeks

time to comply with the office objections on payment of

cost of Rs.1,000/- payable at the Registry, failing which

to list the matter for dismissal. Inspite of the same, cost

is not paid and the office objections are also not complied

with till date. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-

compliance of office objections.

Sd/-

JUDGE

MD