Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1211 Kant
Judgement Date : 7 February, 2023
-1-
WA No. 935 of 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2023
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY
WRIT APPEAL NO. 935 OF 2016 (LA-BDA)
BETWEEN:
SMT. MANGALA
W/O C. BYATAPPA
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
RESIDING AT NO.1264
8TH MAIN ROAD
PRAKASH NAGAR
BANGALORE - 560 021.
...APPELLANT
Digitally signed (BY SMT. NALEENA LOGAN., ADV.)
by B A
KRISHNA AND:
KUMAR
Location: High
Court of 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA
Karnataka
MINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT
VIKASA SOUDHA, VIKASA VEEDHI
ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 001.
2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD
KUMARAPARK WEST
BANGALORE - 560 020.
REPRESENTED BY ITS
COMMISSIONER.
3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD
KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE - 560 020.
4. M/S KARNATAKA VIDYAVARDHAKA
TRUST (R), VIJAYANAGAR
-2-
WA No. 935 of 2016
BANGALORE - 560 040
REPRESENTED BY ITS
SECRETARY/TRUSTEE.
5. SRI MALLESHAPPA
S/O SRI BASAVARAJ
AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS
TRUSTEE-M/S. KARNATAKA
VIDYAVARDHAKA TRUST (R)
NO.1378, 10TH CROSS
VIJAYANAGAR
BANGALORE - 560 040.
6. SRI A.B. CHITAPUR
S/O.SRI BASAPPA CHITAPUR
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS
TRUSTEE, M/S KARNATAKA
VIDYAVARDHAKA TRUST(R)
NO.1846/48, 19TH CROSS
20TH MAIN, VIJAYANAGAR
BANGALORE - 560 040.
7. SMT. CHANNAMMA
W/O SRI AIYANNA
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
NO.1846, 19TH CROSS
20TH MAIN, VIJAYANAGAR
BANGALORE - 560 040.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI B. RAJENDRA PRASAD, HCGP FOR R-1;
SRI N.B. DAS, ADV., FOR R-2 & R-3;
SRI H.S. SANTHOSH, ADV., FOR R-4 & R-5;
R-6 & R-7 ARE SERVED)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH
COURT ACT, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED IN THE
WRIT PETITION 2560/2013 DATED 14/03/2016.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ALOK
ARADHE J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
-3-
WA No. 935 of 2016
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellant after arguing the
matter to some extent submitted that the appellant be granted
liberty to file a suit for damages.
2. The aforesaid liberty has already been granted by
the learned Single Judge as it is evidenced from paragraph
No.2 of the order passed by the learned Single Judge.
The appeal is therefore disposed of. The pending
interlocutory applications, if any, are disposed of.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE
NMS
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!