Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 9557 Kant
Judgement Date : 6 December, 2023
-1-
NC: 2023:KHC-K:9053
RSA No. 200313 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
KALABURAGI BENCH
DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M G UMA
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.200313 OF 2022
(DEC/INJ)
BETWEEN:
SHAH SAJID MOHIUDDIN QUADRI
S/O LATE SHAH SAFDAR QUADRI,
AGE: 44 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS,
H.NO. 5-2-149, GOLE KHANA,
BIDAR-585401.
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI MANURE ASHOK KUMAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. ABDUL MAJEED
S/O LATE MOHD HUSSAIN SAB
Digitally signed by AGE: 54 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS,
SWETA KULKARNI H.NO. 7-3-115, DARGA PURA,
Location: HIGH
COURT OF BIDAR-585401.
KARNATAKA
SALEEMA BEGUM W/O MOHD HUSSAIN
DIED BY LR'S.
2. GOUSIYA BEGUM W/O FAHEEMUDDIN,
AGE: 74 YEARS, OCC: HOUSE HOLD,
H.NO.7-3-115, DARGAH PURA,
BIDAR-585401.
3. MOHAMMED PASHA
S/O LATE MOHAMMED HUSSAIN
AGE: 71 YEARS, OCC: RETD. GOVT. SERVANT,
-2-
NC: 2023:KHC-K:9053
RSA No. 200313 of 2022
H.NO.7-3-115, DARGAH PURA,
BIDAR-585401.
4. ABDUL MAJEED
S/O LATE MOHAMMED HUSSAIN
AGE: 62 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS,
H.NO.7-3-115, DARGAH PURA,
BIDAR-585401.
5. ABDUL SAMAD
S/O MOHAMMED HUSSAIN
AGE: 56 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS,
H.NO.7-3-115, DARGAH PURA,
BIDAR-585401.
...RESPONDENTS
THIS RSA IS FILED U/S 100 OF CPC, PRAYING TO ALLOW
THE APPEAL AND 1ST APPELLATE COURT JUDGMENT i.e., R.A.
39/2015 MAY BE SET ASIDE AND THE O.S. NO. 118/2011 IS
TO BE RETAINED.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Counsel for the appellant is absent. No representation.
The appeal is of the year 2022. The matter is listed for
the sixth time for compliance of office objections. The order
dated 07.11.2023 reads as under:
"Learned counsel for the appellant is absent. No
representation even though the matter is passed over
twice.
The matter is being listed for 5th time for compliance of office objections.
NC: 2023:KHC-K:9053
I do not find any reason to adjourn the matter. However, to afford final opportunity, list the matter on 06.12.2023 for compliance of office objections."
Inspite of that, there is non-compliance of the office
objections. The appellants are not interested to prosecute the
appeal. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-compliance of
office objections.
Sd/-
JUDGE
SWK CT-VD
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!