Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Smt. Gajalakshmi N vs N. Nagaraj
2023 Latest Caselaw 9551 Kant

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 9551 Kant
Judgement Date : 6 December, 2023

Karnataka High Court

Smt. Gajalakshmi N vs N. Nagaraj on 6 December, 2023

                                       -1-
                                                     NC: 2023:KHC:44154
                                                    CRP No. 711 of 2023




                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                   DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2023

                                     BEFORE
                       THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. NATARAJ
                  CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 711 OF 2023 (IO)
            BETWEEN:

            SMT. GAJALAKSHMI N,
            W/O SRI. L. C. SATHISHA,
            AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS,
            RESIDING AT NO.1485/1,
            ARAVINDANAGAR, KAMMANAHALLI,
            BENGALURU - 560 084.
                                                          ...PETITIONER
            (BY SRI. P PRASAD, ADVOCATE FOR GUHA ASSOCIATES)

            AND:

            1.    N. NAGARAJ,
                  SON OF SRI. B. NARASIMHA REDDY,
Digitally         AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS,
signed by         RESIDING AT NO.19/7,
SUMA
Location:         MYSORE DEVIATION ROAD,
HIGH
COURT OF          GOPALAPURAM, MAGADI ROAD,
KARNATAKA         BENGALURU - 560 023.

            2.    SMT. JAYALAKSHMI,
                  WIDE OF SRI. N. RADHAKRISHNA REDDY,
                  AGED ABOUT 81 YEARS,
                  R/AT NO.23/1, 5TH CROSS,
                  L.N. COLONY, YESHWANTHAPUR,
                  BENGALURU - 560 022.
                            -2-
                                       NC: 2023:KHC:44154
                                      CRP No. 711 of 2023




3.   SMT. SARALA,
     WIFE OF SRI. N. NAGARAJ,
     AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS,
     R/AT NO.302, GANESH RESIDENCY,
     13TH CROSS, 4TH MAIN,
     MALLESWARAM, BENGALURU - 560 003.

4.   SMT. PREMA.
     WIFE OF SRI SUBRAMANI REDDY,
     AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS,

5.   NAVEEN,
     SON OF SRI SUBRAMANI REDDY,
     AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,

6.   SMT. SHILPA,
     DAUGHTER OF SRI. SUBRAMANI REDDY,
     AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,

     NOS. 3 TO 6 ARE THE ONLY
     LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES AND
     RESIDING AT SATHYA CARNATION APARTMENTS,
     NO.8, 9 AND 10, SATHYA ENCLAVE,
     HENNUR MAIN ROAD, GEDDALAHALLI,
     BENGALURU - 560 043.

7.   SMT. SUSHEELA,
     WIFE OF SRI. CHINNASWAMY REDDY,
     AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS,
     RESIDING AT OPPOSITE TO BETHNEY SCHOOL,
     AUDUGODI POST, KORAMANGALA,
     BENGALURU - 560 030.

8.   SMT. RAJESHWARI,
     WIFE OF SRI. S. JAYAMAM REDDY,
     AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS,
                                 -3-
                                              NC: 2023:KHC:44154
                                             CRP No. 711 of 2023




     RESIDING AT NO.15/1,
     SUBBAIAH REDDY ROAD, ULSOOR,
     BENGALURU - 560 008.

9.   SMT. GEETHA,
     WIFE OF SRI. C M MOHANRAM REDDY,
     AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,
     NO.55/1, 13TH CROSS,
     4TH MAIN, MALLESWARAM,
     BENGALURU - 560 003.
                                                  ...RESPONDENTS
     THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S 115 OF
CR.P.C, PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS OF OS NO.2055/2007
IN THE COURT OF XXII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND
SESSIONS JUDGE BANGALORE CITY (CCH7).

     THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
                            ORDER

This revision petition is filed challenging the findings on

additional issue No.1 in the judgment and decree dated

28.08.2023 passed by the XXII Additional City Civil and

Sessions Judge at Bengaluru City (CCH-7) in OS No.2055/2007.

2. The Registry has raised an objection regarding

maintainability of this revision petition since the challenge is

not to any interlocutory order but in respect of a finding on

additional issue No.1 and also on the ground that no

proceedings are pending before the Trial Court.

NC: 2023:KHC:44154

3. It is now stated by the learned counsel for the

petitioner that the plaintiff in OS No.2055/2007 connected with

OS No.26275/2007 has already filed RFA No.1978/2023 and

RFA No.2297/2023. If that be so, the petitioner is always

entitled to challenge the findings on additional issue No.1 in

RFA No.1978/2023 and RFA No.2297/2023 by filing appropriate

cross-objection or a cross appeal.

4. In that view of the matter, this revision petition is

not maintainable and the office objections regarding

maintainability of this revision petition is up held and the

revision petition is dismissed. However the petitioner is entitled

to pursue any other remedy in accordance with law. For

statistical purposes this revision petition is treated as closed.

Sd/-

JUDGE

KBM

CT: BHK

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter