Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Shehanaz Begum And Ors vs Rajkumar
2023 Latest Caselaw 9014 Kant

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 9014 Kant
Judgement Date : 1 December, 2023

Karnataka High Court

Shehanaz Begum And Ors vs Rajkumar on 1 December, 2023

Author: M.G.S.Kamal

Bench: M.G.S.Kamal

                                              -1-
                                                    NC: 2023:KHC-K:8949
                                                       MFA No. 200770 of 2017




                            IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

                                    KALABURAGI BENCH

                        DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF DECEMBER, 2023

                                           BEFORE
                          THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S.KAMAL

                    MISCL. FIRST APPEAL NO.200770 OF 2017 (MV-D)

                   BETWEEN:

                   1.   SHEHANAZ BEGUM
                        W/O LATE MUNEER,
                        AGE: 42 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEWIFE,

                   2.   SAMINA BEGUM
                        D/O LATE MUNEER,
                        AGE: 20 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT,

                   3.   KHAJA PASHA
                        S/O LATE MUNEER,
                        AGE: 16 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT,

Digitally signed   4.   MD. SAMEER
by LUCYGRACE            S/O LATE MUNEER,
Location: HIGH          AGE: 14 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT,
COURT OF
KARNATAKA          5.   MD. ZAMEER
                        S/O LATE MUNEER,
                        AGE: 11 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT,

                        (APPELLANTS NO.3 TO 5 ARE MINORS,
                        HENCE APPEAL FILED THROUGH THEIR
                        NATURAL MOTHER APPELLANT NO.1)

                   6.   KURABEE W/O LATE WAHEEDALI,
                        AGE: 62 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEWIFE,
                              -2-
                                    NC: 2023:KHC-K:8949
                                     MFA No. 200770 of 2017




     ALL R/O VILLAGE BAGDAL,
     TQ. & DIST. BIDAR - 585 402.

                                               ...APPELLANTS

(BY SRI. BASAVARAJ R. MATH, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.   RAJKUMAR S/O PEERAPPA,
     AGE: MAJOR, OCC: BUSINESS,
     R/O H.NO.234, JANWADA VILLAGE,
     TQ. & DIST. BIDAR-585 402.
     (REGISTERED OWNER OF VEHICLE BEARING
     REG.NO.DCM AP9/T3927)

2.   THE BRANCH MANAGER OF
     UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.,
     BRANCH OFFICE, BASWASHREE TOWER,
     KEB ROAD, NEAR GANESH MAIDAN,
     BIDAR-585 401.

                                             ...RESPONDENTS

(SRI. SUDARSHAN M., ADVOCATE FOR R2;
 R1 - SERVED)

       THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF MOTOR
VEHICLES    ACT,   PRAYING   TO     MODIFY   THE   IMPUGNED
JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 17.12.2016 PASSED BY THE
PRINCIPAL MACT AND PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS
JUDGE AT BIDAR IN MVC NO.114/2015.


       THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
                                        -3-
                                               NC: 2023:KHC-K:8949
                                                MFA No. 200770 of 2017




                             JUDGMENT

This appeal is by the claimants being the legal

representatives of deceased Md. Muneer, who died in an

accident that occurred on 02.11.2013 involving a lorry

DCM bearing Reg. No.KA-38/5844 and another lorry

bearing Reg. No.AP-9/T-3927, against the judgment and

award dated 17.12.2016 passed in MVC No.114/2015 on

the file of Principal Motor Accident Claims Tribunal and

Principal District and Sessions Judge at Bidar (for short

'Tribunal'), by which, while partly allowing the claim

petition, the Tribunal has awarded compensation of

Rs.12,04,000/- with interest at 6% p.a. from the date of

petition till realisation, directing respondent No.2 -

Insurance Company to pay the same.

2. The accident in question resulting in death of

the deceased is not in dispute. A case in Crime

No.123/2014 under Section 304-A of IPC was registered

against the driver of the offending lorry bearing Reg.

No.AP-9/T-3927.

NC: 2023:KHC-K:8949

3. The claim petition was filed by the claimants

contending that the deceased Muneer aged about 43

years, working as a driver of the lorry bearing Reg. No.KA-

38/5844 was earning a sum of Rs.15,000/- per month as

salary being Rs.10,000/- and Rs.200/- being daily bhatta.

That, due to the untimely death of the deceased,

claimants have put to financial and mental distress. Hence,

claimed compensation of Rs.25.00 lakhs.

4. The Tribunal on appreciation of the evidence,

assessed the income of the deceased at Rs.9,000/- per

month. Deducting 1/4th towards his personal and living

expenses and applying the multiplier of 14 has awarded a

sum of Rs.11,34,000/- towards loss of dependency. In

addition, the Tribunal has awarded Rs.20,000/- towards

loss of consortium, Rs.20,000/- towards loss of love and

affection, Rs.20,000/- towards loss of estate and

Rs.10,000/- towards funeral expenses, obsequies

ceremony, transportation of dead body etc., which is

aggregating in a sum of Rs.12,04,000/-. Being aggrieved

NC: 2023:KHC-K:8949

by the same, the appellants are before this Court, seeking

enhancement.

5. Heard the learned counsel for the parties and

perused the records.

6. Since the accident in question resulting in death

of deceased Muneer leaving behind the claimants as his

representatives not being disputed, the only point that

requires consideration is the quantum of compensation.

Though it is contended that the deceased was having

income of Rs.15,000/- per month, the Tribunal has

assessed the income at Rs.9,000/- per month. The same

is held to be just and proper. The Tribunal has however

not awarded future prospects. In view of the law laid down

by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of National

Insurance Company Limited v. Pranay Sethi and

others reported in (2017) 16 SCC 680, considering the

age of the deceased being 43 years, 25% of the income

has to be added towards future prospects. Since the

NC: 2023:KHC-K:8949

deceased left behind 6 dependents, 1/4th needs to be

deducted towards his personal and living expenses.

Considering the age of the deceased, multiplier of '14' is

applied. Calculated as above, the appellants would be

entitled for total compensation of Rs.14,17,500/-

(Rs.9,000 + 25% x 12 x 14 x 3/4) towards loss of

dependency.

7. In view of the law laid down by the Hon'ble

Apex Court in case of Magma General Insurance

Company Limited vs. Nanu Ram Alias Chuhru Ram

and others reported in (2018) 18 SCC 130 which is

subsequently clarified in United India Insurance Co.

Ltd., v. Satinder Kaur alias Satwinder Kaur and

others reported in AIR 2020 SC 3076, appellants being

wife, children and mother of the deceased respectively are

entitled for Rs.40,000/- each aggregating in a sum of

Rs.2,40,000/- towards loss of consortium.

NC: 2023:KHC-K:8949

8. Further, the appellants are entitled for

Rs.15,000/- towards loss of estate and Rs.15,000/-

towards funeral expenses.

9. That apart, in view of the law laid down by the

Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Pranay Sethi (supra),

there shall be increment of 10% on the compensation

awarded under conventional heads.

10. Thus, the claimants are held entitled for a total

compensation of Rs.17,14,500/- instead of Rs.12,04,000/-

awarded by the Tribunal as under:

 Sl.            Heads                  By                    By
 No.                                Tribunal             this Court
 1      Loss of dependency Rs.11,34,000/-             Rs.14,17,500/-
 2      Loss of love and         Rs.20,000/-               --
        affection
 3      Loss of consortium       Rs.20,000/-            Rs.2,40,000/-
 4      Loss of estate           Rs.20,000/-              Rs.15,000/-
 5      Funeral expenses,        Rs.10,000/-              Rs.15,000/-
        obsequies       and
        transportation    of
        dead body
        Addition of 10%             -                    Rs.27,000/-
        Total                Rs.12,04,000/-           Rs.17,14,500/-


11. For the foregoing reasons, the following:

NC: 2023:KHC-K:8949

ORDER

a) The appeal is partly allowed.

b) The appellants/claimants are held entitled for a total compensation of Rs.17,14,500/- instead of Rs.12,04,000/- awarded by the Tribunal with interest at 6% per annum from the date of claim petition till realization.

c) Respondent No.2 - Insurance Company shall deposit the aforesaid compensation amount within a period six weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this judgment.

d) The award of the Tribunal is modified accordingly.

e) Registry to transmit the Trial Court records to the Tribunal.

Sd/-

JUDGE

LG

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter