Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Gudusab S/O Babu @ Dasthgir Kudachi vs Sadiq S/O Appalal Makandar
2023 Latest Caselaw 11380 Kant

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 11380 Kant
Judgement Date : 21 December, 2023

Karnataka High Court

Gudusab S/O Babu @ Dasthgir Kudachi vs Sadiq S/O Appalal Makandar on 21 December, 2023

Author: Hanchate Sanjeevkumar

Bench: Hanchate Sanjeevkumar

                                                             -1-
                                                                   NC: 2023:KHC-D:14999
                                                                      MFA No. 23518 of 2012




                                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
                                        DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF DECEMBER, 2023
                                                            BEFORE
                                    THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR
                                  MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 23518 OF 2012 (MV-I)
                                 BETWEEN

                                 SRI. GUDUSAB,
                                 S/O BABU @ DASTHGIR KUDACHI,
                                 AGE: 41 YEARS,
                                 OCC: NOW NIL (AGRICULTURIST LABOUR),
                                 R/O: K H BALEKUNDRI,
                                 TQ/DIST: BELGAUM.
                                                                               ...APPELLANT

                                 (BY SRI. VITTHAL S TELI)

                                 AND

                                 1 SRI. SADIQ,
                                 . S/O APPALAL MAKANDAR,
                                   AGE: MAJOR,
                                   OCC: BUSINESS ,
                                   R/O: AT and POST: PARISHWAD
                                   TQ: KHANAPUR,
              Digitally signed
              by
VIJAYALAKSHMI VIJAYALAKSHMI
M KANKUPPI    M KANKUPPI
                                   DIST: BELGAUM.
              Date: 2023.12.22
              11:16:45 +0530




                                 2 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO., LTD.,
                                 . REPTD., BY IT S BRANCH MANAGER,
                                   RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO., LTD.,
                                   BELGAUM - 10.
                                                                            ...RESPONDENTS

                                 (BY SRI. G.N. RAICHUR ADVOCATE FOR R2;
                                     SMT : R1-NOTICE DISPENSED WITH)

                                      THIS MFA FILED IS U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT, AGAINST THE
                                 JUDGMENT AND AWARD DTD:15-03-2012 PASSED IN MVC
                                 NO.1994/2011 ON THE FILE OF IV-ADDL. DISTRICT AND
                            -2-
                                 NC: 2023:KHC-D:14999
                                    MFA No. 23518 of 2012




SESSIONS JUDGE AND MEMBER, MACT-V, BELGUAM, PARTLY
ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND
SEEKING     ENHANCEMENT      OF     COMPENSATION.

     THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS
DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:


                       JUDGEMENT

This appeal is filed by the claimant challenging the

judgment and award dated 15.03.2012 passed by the

tribunal, in MVC No.1994/2011 seeking enhancement of

compensation.

2. Heard the arguments and perused the material

placed before the Court.

3. The occurrence of accident, injuries sustained

by the claimant, coverage of insurance are not in dispute

in this case.

4. In the present case, from the medical evidence

on record it is proved that the claimant had suffered the

following injuries.

NC: 2023:KHC-D:14999

i) Hip dislocation with femur (right).

ii) Fracture of right tibia spine.

iii) Soft tissue injuries on the left foot.

5. The tribunal has awarded compensation under

various heads as under:

   Sl.                 Heads.                       Amount in
   No.                                                (Rs.)

    1.    Towards pain and suffering.                 40,000/-

    2.    Towards loss of amenities and               15,000/-
          enjoyment of life

    3.    Towards medical expenses.                   37,000/-

    4.    Towards loss of income during               12,000/-
          treatment period.

    5.    Towards attendant charges,                   5,000/-
          conveyance & nourishment

    6.    Towards loss of future income               75,600/-

                                       Total: 1,84,600/-




6. Considering the nature of injuries sustained,

compensation awarded by tribunal is lesser side.

NC: 2023:KHC-D:14999

Therefore, the same is required to be enhanced by

modifying the judgment and award.

7. Considering the injuries sustained, a

compensation of Rs.60,000/- towards pain and suffering,

Rs.35,000/- towards loss of amenities are awarded. The

compensation awarded towards medical expenses and

hospital charges of Rs.37,000/- is as per the actual bills

and receipts produced; therefore, the same is kept intact.

Further, Rs.15,000/- towards incidental expenses like

food, nourishment, traveling, attendant charges, etc., and

Rs.24,000/- (Rs.6,000/- x 4 months) towards loss of

income during laid up period for a period of four months,

is awarded.

8. The doctor has stated that the claimant had

suffered 32% of physical disability to the whole body.

Therefore, considering the evidence of the doctor, 18%

functional disability is taken into consideration as the

claimant had suffered hip dislocation, fracture of tibia and

other injuries.

NC: 2023:KHC-D:14999

9. Accordingly as per the age group mentioned in

National Insurance Company Limited vs. Pranay

Sethi and others, reported in (2017) 16 Supreme

Court Cases 680, and as per the Division Bench

judgment of this Court in New India Assurance

Company Vs. Abdul S/o Mehaboob Tahasildar in MFA

No.103807/2016 C/w. MFA Nos.103835/2016 &

103807/2018 and as per the judgment of the Hon'ble

Supreme Court in the case of Sidram vs. Divisional

Manager, United India Insurance Company Limited

and another reported in (2023) 3 SCC 439, even in

the case of injuries, certain income is to be added towards

loss of future prospects in life.

10. The accident is caused in the year 2011.

Therefore, notional income of Rs.6,000/- per month is

taken into consideration, which is recognized by the

Karnataka State Legal Service Authority. Adding 20%, the

income of the claimant has to be taken at Rs.7,200/-. The

claimant was aged 42 years at the time of accident.

NC: 2023:KHC-D:14999

Therefore appropriate applicable multiplier is 14. Hence,

loss of future income due to disability is hereby reassessed

and quantified as Rs.2,17,728/- (Rs.6,000/-+1,200/-

7,200/- x 18/100 x 12 x 14).

11. Thus, the claimant is entitled for total

compensation under various heads as under:

      Sl.                  Heads.                        Amount in
      No.                                                  (Rs.)

      1.     Towards injuries,         pain        and     60,000/-
             suffering.

      2.     Towards medical expenses.                     37,000/-

      3.     Towards loss of amenities.                    35,000/-

      4.     Towards loss of income during                 24,000/-
             laid up period and medical
             treatment period.

      5.     Towards incidental charges like               15,000/-
             attendant charges, food,

nourishment, conveyance, etc.,.

6. Towards loss of future earning 2,17,728/-

capacity.

Total: 3,88,728/-

NC: 2023:KHC-D:14999

12. Therefore, the claimant is entitled for total

compensation of Rs.3,88,728/- along with interest at the

rate of 6% p.a. from the date of filing of the petition till

realization, as against Rs.1,84,600/- awarded by the

Tribunal. The Insurance Company is directed to deposit

the compensation within eight weeks from the date of

receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.

13. In the result, I proceed to pass the following:

ORDER

i) The appeal is allowed in part.

ii) The judgment and award dated

15,03.2012 passed by the IV Addl.

District and Sessions Judge and

MACT-V, Belgaum in MVC

No.1994/2011 stands modified.

iii) The claimant is entitled for total

compensation of Rs.3,88,728/- along

NC: 2023:KHC-D:14999

with interest at the rate of 6% p.a.

from the date of petition till its

realization.

iv) The claimant is not entitled for

interest for the delayed period of 13

days in filing the appeal.

v) The insurance company shall deposit

the amount within a period of eight

weeks from the date of receipt of a

copy of this judgment.

vi) Send back the trial Court records

along with a copy of this judgment.

vii) No order as to costs.

viii) Draw award accordingly.

Sd/-

JUDGE

bnv*

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter