Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sri Maheshkumar S/O Irappa Bankapur vs Sri Basappa S/O Hanumantappa Chaluvadi
2023 Latest Caselaw 11219 Kant

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 11219 Kant
Judgement Date : 20 December, 2023

Karnataka High Court

Sri Maheshkumar S/O Irappa Bankapur vs Sri Basappa S/O Hanumantappa Chaluvadi on 20 December, 2023

Author: Hanchate Sanjeevkumar

Bench: Hanchate Sanjeevkumar

                                        -1-
                                              NC: 2023:KHC-D:14925
                                                 MFA No. 22102 of 2012




                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
                                DHARWAD BENCH

                    DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2023

                                     BEFORE

                 THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR

                 MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.22102/2012(MV-D)

            BETWEEN

            SRI. MAHESHKUMAR,S/O IRAPPA BANKAPUR,
            AGE: 32 YEARS,OCC: COOLI,
            R/O OLD HUBLI,HIREPETH, HUBLI,
            DISTRICT: DHARWAD.
                                                            ... APPELLANT
            (BY SRI. D M MANJUNATH, ADVOCATE )

            AND

            1.    SRI BASAPPA,S/O HANUMANTAPPA CHALUVADI,
                  AGE MAJOR, OCC: DRIVER,
                  R/O INGALGERI, MUDDEBIHAL TALUKA,
                  BIJAPUR DISTRICT.

            2.    RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY,
                  DESAI CROSS,HUBLI,
Digitally
signed by         (POLICY NO. 1402792334002053
SUJATA
SUBHASH            DT.12/06/2009 TO 11/06/2010)
PAMMAR

            3.   SRI BASAVARAJ,S/O SANGAPPA MUDRANAL
                 AGE: MAJOR, OCC: BUSINESS,
                 R/O PADADAYYANA HAKKAL,
                 OLD HUBLI, (OWNER OF GOODS TRUCK NO. KA37/2541)
                                                         ...RESPONDENTS
            (BY SRI. NAGARAJ C KOLLOORI , ADVOCATE FOR R2;
             NOTICE TO R1 IS DISPENSED WITH; R3 SERVED)

                 THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173 (1) OF MV ACT 1988, AGAINST
            THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD 16.12.2010 PASSED IN MVC .NO.
            884/2009 ON THE FILE OF THE PRESIDING OFFICER FAST TRACK
            COURT-II, DHARWAD, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR
            COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.
                                  -2-
                                       NC: 2023:KHC-D:14925
                                          MFA No. 22102 of 2012




     THIS APPEAL HAVING BEEN HEARD AND RESERVED FOR
JUDGMENT ON 02.11.2023, COMING ON FOR PRONOUNCEMENT OF
JUDGMENT    THIS    DAY    THE    COURTDELIVERED   THE
FOLLOWING JUDGMENT.

                             JUDGMENT

This appeal is filed by the claimants challenging the

judgment and award dated 16.12.2010, passed by the

tribunal in MVC No.884/2009 seeking enhancement of

compensation.

2. Heard the arguments and perused the material

placed on record.

3. In this case, the factum of accident, death of

deceased in the said accident and coverage of insurance

are not in dispute.

4. In the present case, the tribunal awarded

compensation under various heads as follows:

Sl.No.                  Heads.                Amount in
                                                (Rs.)

  1.        Loss of Estate                    3,12,800/-

  2.        Transportation of dead body,         5,000/-

                                      NC: 2023:KHC-D:14925





            funeral ceremony    and    other
            obsequies etc.

                                      Total:   3,17,800/-




       5.     The   tribunal   awarded    lesser   amount   of

compensation contrary to the principles of law decided by

the Hon'ble Supreme Court. Therefore, the same is

required to be modified.

6. The deceased was aged 27 years as on the date

of accident and was a Businessman. The accident is of the

year 2009. The claimant has furnished Income Tax

returns showing that his earning is Rs.99,411/- p.a., and

this can be considered as income of the deceased, which

comes to Rs.7,700/- p.m. Hence notional income is to be

taken at Rs.7,700/- p.m. In view of the decision of the

Hon'ble Apex Court in case of National Insurance

Company Limited vs. Pranay Sethi and others,

reported in (2017) 16 Supreme Court Cases 680,

30% of the income is to be added towards loss of future

NC: 2023:KHC-D:14925

prospects in life. The deceased was a bachelor and there

is only one legal heir. Therefore, 50% of the income is to

be deducted towards personal and living expenses.

Considering the age of the deceased, the appropriate

applicable multiplier is 17. Therefore, loss of dependency

is re-assessed and quantified at Rs.10,21,020/-

(Rs.7,700/- +30% = 10,010 x 50/100 x 12 x 17).

7. In view of the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme

Court in the case of Magma General Insurance Co.

Limited v. Nanu Ram & Others, reported in 2018 ACJ

2782 and in the case of Pranay Sethi supra, the

claimants are entitled to Rs.40,000/- each under the head

'loss of consortium', along with 10% escalation.

Accordingly, Rs.44,000/- (Rs.40,000/- + 10%) is

awarded under the head 'loss of consortium including loss

of love and affection'.

8. Further, a compensation of Rs.15,000/- each is

awarded under the head 'loss of estate' and 'funeral and

transportation' respectively, along with 10% escalation.

NC: 2023:KHC-D:14925

Therefore under these heads Rs.33,000/- (Rs.15,000 x 2

+ 10%) is awarded.

9. Thus, the claimants would be entitled for

compensation under various heads as under:

Sl.                 Heads.                   Amount in
No.                                            (Rs.)

 1.   Towards loss of dependency             10,21,020/-



 2.   Loss of consortium                         44,000/-

 3.   Towards loss of estate and                 33,000/-
      transportation of dead body &
      funeral expenses.

      (15,000 x 2 + 10%)

                                     Total: 10,98,020/-




10. Therefore, the claimants are entitled for

compensation of Rs.10,98,020/- along with interest at

the rate of 6% p.a. from the date of filing of the petition

till realization, as against Rs.3,17,800/- awarded by the

tribunal. The insurance company is directed to deposit the

NC: 2023:KHC-D:14925

compensation within eight weeks from the date of receipt

of a certified copy of this judgment.

11. In the result, I proceed to pass the following:

ORDER

i) The appeal is allowed in part.

ii) The judgment and award dated 16.12.2010, passed by the tribunal in MVC No.884/2009 stands modified.

iii) The claimants are entitled for total compensation of Rs.10,98,020/- along with interest at the rate of 6% p.a. from the date of petition till its realization.

iv) The claimants are not entitled for interest for the delayed period of 383 days in filing the appeal.

v) The insurance company shall deposit the amount within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

vi) Send back the trial Court records along with a copy of this judgment.

NC: 2023:KHC-D:14925

vii) No order as to costs.

viii) Draw award accordingly.

SD/-

JUDGE

BNV

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter