Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 11068 Kant
Judgement Date : 19 December, 2023
-1-
NC: 2023:KHC:46215
CRL.A No. 522 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJENDRA BADAMIKAR
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 522 OF 2019
BETWEEN:
MR.K.R. SAHASRANAM,
S/O MR. RAMACHANDRAN,
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS,
PROPRIETOR,
M/S PRIME GASES,
HAVING OFFICE AT NO.645,
6TH MAIN, HAL III STAGE,
BAGNALORE-75.
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. A. YOGASHREE, ADVOCATE AND
SRI. S. SIDDAPPAJI, ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
AND:
MR. C. HARISH KUMAR,
S/O MR. M. CHENNAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,
Digitally PROPRIETOR,
signed by M/S SRI DURGA GASES,
SOWMYA D HAVING BUSINESS PLACE AT
Location: B.B.ROAD, BETTAHALASOOR CROSS,
High Court NEAR BANK OF INDIA ATM,
of BANGALORE-562 157,
Karnataka RESIDING AT
NO.79, NEAR MILKY DIARY,
CHIKKAJALA POST,
BANGALORE NORTH,
BANGALORE-562 157.
...RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. MANJUNATHA .B.R, ADVOCATE(ABSENT))
-2-
NC: 2023:KHC:46215
CRL.A No. 522 of 2019
THIS CRL.A. IS FILED U/S.378(4) CR.P.C PRAYING TO
SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 15.02.2019
PASSED BY THE LVII ADDL.C.M.M., BENGALURU IN
C.C.NO.50805/2018 - ACQUITTING THE RESPONDENT/
ACCUSED FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 138 OF N.I. ACT
I.A.No.1/2019 IS FILED TO GRANT SPECIAL LEAVE TO
INITIATE THE ANNEXED APPEAL AGAINST THE JUDGMENT
DATED 15.02.2019 PASSED BY THE LVII ADDITIONAL CHIEF
METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, BENGALURU IN C.C.
No.50805/2018 FOR THE REASONS STATED THEREIN.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS ALONG WITH
I.A.No.1/2019 THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for appellant is absent regularly.
2. I.A.No.1/2019 is filed seeking leave to
prosecute the matter. Though the matter is pending since
2019, there is no representation on behalf of appellant
regularly.
3. On perusal of the judgment, it is evident that
the time barred debt is claimed by issuing subsequent
notice. Hence, the learned Magistrate has come to a
conclusion that the cheque was not issued to the amount
due and further, the claim is also barred by law of
limitation. The learned counsel for appellant did not
NC: 2023:KHC:46215
appear to enlighten the Court as to how the judgment of
the learned Magistrate is erroneous so as to grant the
leave. Considering these aspects, I.A.No.1/2019 does not
survive for consideration and accordingly, it stands
rejected. Consequently, the appeal stands dismissed.
Sd/-
JUDGE
DS
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!