Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 10734 Kant
Judgement Date : 15 December, 2023
-1-
NC: 2023:KHC:45761
RP No. 472 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA
REVIEW PETITION NO. 472 OF 2023
BETWEEN:
SMT LAKSHMAMMA,
W/O SRI JAVAREGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS,
RESIDING AT HARIKALALE VILLAGE,
KASABA HOBLI, K R PETE TALUK,
MANDYA DISTRICT - 571423,
REP BY HER GPA HOLDER SRI RAGHU H J.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI GIRISH C S, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,
REVENUE DEPARTMENT MULTI STORIED BUILDING,
BANGALORE - 560001, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY.
2. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER,
Digitally MANDYA DISTRICT, MANDYA - 571422.
signed by
KIRAN
KUMAR R 3. THE TAHASILDAR,
Location:
HIGH KRISHNARAJAPETE TALUK,
COURT OF MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 422.
KARNATAKA
4. SRI NARASIMHA SHETTY,
S/O CHELUVA SHETTY,
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS,
R/AT HIRKALALE VILLAGE,
KASABA HOBLI, KRISHNARAJAPETE TALUK,
MANDYA DISTRICT - 571423.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI B RAVINDRANATH, AGA FOR R1 TO R3)
-2-
NC: 2023:KHC:45761
RP No. 472 of 2023
THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER XLVII
RULE 1 READ WITH SECTION 114 OF CPC AND ARTICLE 226
AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING THAT THIS
HON'BLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED:
1. ALLOW THE ABOVE REVIEW PETITION.
2. REVIEW THE ORDER DATED 16.06.2022 PASSED BY THIS
HON'BLE COURT IN WP NO. 11671/2022 (KLR-RES).
3 TO PASS ANY OTHER ORDER IN THE FACTS AND
CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE AS THIS HON'BLE COURT
DEEMS FIT, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE
COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing the
matter for some time, seeks leave of the Court to withdraw the
review petition and seeks liberty to challenge the order passed
by the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal in appeal No. 444/96,
since the order which is sought to be reviewed was passed on
the basis of the order passed by the Karnataka Appellate
Tribunal.
2. In view of the above said judgment, the review petition is
dismissed, reserving liberty to the petitioner to initiate
appropriate proceedings against the order passed by the
Karnataka Appellate Tribunal in appeal No.444/96.
NC: 2023:KHC:45761
3. In view of the order passed on merits, there is no need to
consider the application for condonation of delay.
Sd/-
JUDGE
BRN
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!