Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ayyappa And Anr vs Special Land
2023 Latest Caselaw 10155 Kant

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 10155 Kant
Judgement Date : 11 December, 2023

Karnataka High Court

Ayyappa And Anr vs Special Land on 11 December, 2023

Author: R.Devdas

Bench: R.Devdas

                                                   -1-
                                                     NC: 2023:KHC-K:9143-DB
                                                          RP No. 200011 of 2019




                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

                                         KALABURAGI BENCH

                            DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2023

                                              PRESENT

                                 THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.DEVDAS
                                                   AND
                                 THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C M JOSHI

                                REVIEW PETITION NO.200011 OF 2019
                                                   IN
                                    M.F.A.NO.7443 OF 2006 (LAC)
                       BETWEEN:

                            AYYAPPA S/O SIDDAYYA
                            DECEASED BY LRS.

                       1.   SMT. NEELAMMA W/O SIDDAYYA
                            AGE: 82 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD
                            R/O CHENNUR, TQ.CHINCHOLI
                            DIST. KALABURAGI

Digitally signed by    2.   SIDDAYYA S/O AYYAPPA
VARSHA N
RASALKAR                    AGE: 47 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE
Location: High Court        R/O CHENNUR, TQ.CHINCHOLI
Of Karnataka
                            DIST. KALABURAGI.
                                                          ...REVIEW PETITIONERS

                       (BY SRI. HARSHAVARDHAN R. MALIPATIL, ADVOCATE)
                       AND:

                       SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
                       MAJOR AND MINOR IRRIGATION PROJECT
                       KALABURAGI-585 102.
                                                                 ...RESPONDENT

                       (BY SRI. MALLIKARJUN C. BASAREDDY, GOVT.ADVOCATE)
                                -2-
                                 NC: 2023:KHC-K:9143-DB
                                         RP No. 200011 of 2019




     THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 114
READ WITH ORDER 47 RULE 1 OF CPC, PRAYING TO REVIEW
THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD OF THIS HON'BLE COURT IN
M.F.A.NO.7443    OF     2006         DATED   04.08.2008   AND
CONSEQUENTLY AWARD OF RS.1,15,086/- PER ACRE FOR DRY
LAND WITH ALL STATUTORY BENEFITS AND COST, IN THE
INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.


     THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
R.DEVDAS J., MADE THE FOLLOWING:


                          ORDER

R. DEVDAS J., (ORAL):

Learned Government Advocate takes notice for the

respondent.

2. Accepting the reasons stated in the affidavit

filed in support of the application, I.A.No.2/2019 filed for

prosecuting the petition is allowed.

3. This review petition has been filed by the legal

representatives of appellant in M.F.A.No.7443/2006 which

was disposed of on 04.08.2008 based on a judgment and

award passed in M.F.A.No.7498/2006.

NC: 2023:KHC-K:9143-DB

4. Learned Counsel for the petitioners has brought

to our notice several such orders passed in review

petitions. Two of the most recent ones are in

R.P.No.200013/2018 dated 15.02.2019 and

R.P.No.200015/2014 dated 23.08.2019. This Court

accepted the contentions of the review petitioners and

held that there cannot be discrimination in payment of

compensation amongst similarly situated land owners. It

was also noticed that the compensation in respect of

irrigated lands has been enhanced to Rs.1,72,630/- per

acre and in respect of dry lands, it was enhanced to

Rs.1,15,085/- per acre. In that view of the matter, the

review petitions were allowed while restoring the

Miscellaneous First Appeals. In fact, it is brought to the

notice of this Court that after restoration,

M.F.A.No.11585/2005 has been disposed of by order dated

15.02.2019.

5. Of course, there being an inordinate delay of

3823 days in filing the review petition, as was directed in

NC: 2023:KHC-K:9143-DB

such other review petitions, the review petitioners shall not

be entitled for payment of interest not only during the

delayed period of 3823 days in filing the review petition but

the petitioners shall also not be entitled for interest from

the date of judgment and award passed in M.F.A.No.

7443/2006 dated 04.08.2008 till date i.e., 11.12.2023.

Accordingly, I.A.No.1/2019 for condonation of delay is

allowed. Delay is condoned. In that view of the matter, we

are required to allow the review petition.

6. Accordingly, the review petition is allowed with

costs. The judgment and award dated 04.08.2008 passed

in M.F.A.No.7443/2006 is recalled. The appeal in

M.F.A.No.7443/2006 is restored to its original file.

7. The review petitioners shall not be entitled for

payment of interest not only during the delayed period of

3823 days in filing the review petition but the petitioners

shall also not be entitled for interest from the date of

judgment and award dated 04.08.2008 passed in

M.F.A.No.7443/2006, till date i.e., 11.12.2023.

NC: 2023:KHC-K:9143-DB

8. List M.F.A.No.7443/2006 on 19.12.2023.

Sd/-

JUDGE

Sd/-

JUDGE VNR CT:VK

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter