Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 10092 Kant
Judgement Date : 11 December, 2023
-1-
NC: 2023:KHC:45081
MFA No. 6564 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 6564 OF 2017 (MV-I)
BETWEEN:
SMT SHIVAMMA
W/O NANDEESHAIAH
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS
R/AT KUNIGAL TOWN,
NOW R/AT SHIVA KRUPA,
MAHALAKSHMI NAGARA,
MADHUGIRI ROAD,
SIRA GATE, TUMKUR TOWN,
TUMKUR-572 106
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI RAMESH K R.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. SRI JAIDEEP JAGANNATH HARIDAS
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS
Digitally
R/AT FLAT NO.3,
signed by
JAI JYOTHI J RAMPRASAD COMPLEX,
CHANDNI CHOWK,
Location:
HIGH NEAR KARNATAKA B SANGLI
COURT OF MIRAJ ROAD, SANGLI,
KARNATAKA MAHARASTRA-416 416
2. ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL
INSURANCE COMPANY,
ICICI LOMBARD HOUSE 414,
VEER SARKAR MARG,
NEAR SIDDI VINAYAKA TEMPLE,
PRABADEVI, MUMBAI,
-2-
NC: 2023:KHC:45081
MFA No. 6564 of 2017
MAHARASTRA-400 025
SERVICE ADDRESS:
THE BRANCH MANAGER,
ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY,
2ND FLOOR, PRAJA PRAGATHI BUILDING,
B.H.ROAD, TUMKUR TOWN,
TUMKUR-572 101
REP BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI L P SURESH.,ADVOCATE FOR R1;
SRI LAKSHMINARASAPPA FOR SRI A.M.VENKATESH,
ADVOCATE FOR R-2)
THIS MFA FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED:13.03.2017 PASSED IN MVC
NO.81/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL SENIOR
CIVIL JUDGE, MACT, TUMAKURU, PARTLY ALLOWING THE
CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING
ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
This is an appeal filed by the claimant aggrieved by
the dismissal of MVC.No.81/2015 dated 13.03.2017 on the
file of the II Addl. Senior Civil Judge & MACT, Tumakuru.
2. The claim petition was filed seeking
compensation of an amount of Rs.8,00,000/- for the
injuries sustained by the claimant in the accident. It is the
NC: 2023:KHC:45081
case of the claimant that he is earning an amount of
Rs.10,000/- per month. The court below as there was no
evidence with regard to the income has taken an amount
of Rs.6,000/- as income. As per the evidence of the
doctor, he suffers 20% disability and in several
documents, the age of the claimant is shown as 62, 52
and 41, and the court below had taken 52 years. Under
the head of loss of future income had granted an amount
of Rs.1,58,400/-. Then coming to the pain and suffering,
considering the three grievous injuries suffered by the
claimant, an amount of Rs.60,000/- is awarded. Towards
medical expenses an amount of Rs.9,809/-, towards
attendant charges an amount of Rs.16,000/-, towards food
and nourishment an amount of Rs.16,000/-, towards loss
of income during the laid up period, considering the salary
at an amount of Rs.6,000/- for five months had granted
an amount of Rs.30,000/-, towards loss of amenities an
amount of Rs.25,000/- were granted. Altogether
NC: 2023:KHC:45081
compensation of an amount of Rs.3,25,209/- was awarded
by the Tribunal.
3. Learned counsel for the claimant submits that
the claimant had sustained three grievous injuries apart
from the simple injuries. Under the head of pain and
suffering granting of an amount of Rs.60,000/- is on lower
side. He was in hospital for 64 days as inpatient, under
the head of Attendant, Nourishment and Conveyance had
granted an amount of Rs.10,000/-, Rs.16,000/- and
Rs.16,000/- is on the lower side. It is submitted that
when it comes to loss of future court below ought not to
have taken Rs.6,000/- as income and further the age was
wrongly taken as 52 years instead of 42 years. Even
under the head of loss of amenities also, the amounts that
were granted were not reasonable.
4. Learned counsel for the Insurance Company
submits that the Tribunal had rightly considered the
NC: 2023:KHC:45081
evidence and considering the discrepancy between the
several records wherein different dates are show, the court
below had rightly taken age at 52 years. It is submitted
that regarding income, without any evidence the court had
taken Rs.6,000/- as income, that also requires re-
consideration. It is submitted that the amounts that were
granted by the tribunal are reasonable and no interference
is called for.
5. Having heard the learned counsel on either
side, perused the entire material on record. As per the
wound certificate, claimant had sustained abrasion over
lateral aspect of right elbow measuring 4 x 4 cm, abrasion
over medial aspect of left elbow measuring 3 x 3 cm,
fracture of both bones of left leg, lacerated wound on left
occipital area measuring 2 x 2 cm, abrasion of right
clavicle and tenderness present and the injuries are
grievous in nature. Under the head of pain and suffering,
the court below had granted an amount of Rs.60,000/-,
NC: 2023:KHC:45081
considering the injuries, this court is granting an amount
of Rs.70,000/-. Then coming to loss of future income, as
this is an accident of 2014, though there is no evidence,
this court is inclined to take income at an amount of
Rs.8,500/-, taking 52 years age as per the documents
placed before the court, the claimant is entitled for an
amount of Rs.2,24,400/- under the head of loss of future
income. (Rs.8,500/- x 12 x 11 x 20/100=Rs.2,24,400/-) .
Then coming to Attendant charges, admittedly there is 64
days hospitalization period, this court is granting an
amount of Rs.30,000/- . Towards Conveyance and
Nutrition charges, the court below had rightly granted an
amount of Rs.10,000/- and Rs.16,000/- which this
court is not inclined to interfere. Towards medical
expenses an amount of Rs.9,809/- is granted by the
court below, which is a reasonable amount. Then coming
to the loss of income during the laid up period, as this
court is considered the income at Rs.8,500/-, for five
months an amount of Rs.42,500/- is granted. Towards
NC: 2023:KHC:45081
Loss of amenities, considering the evidence of the doctor
that the claimant is unable to squat and sit cross leg,
difficulty in standing on the left lower limb without
support, fore arm muscle power is reduced and range of
movement at right fore arm is painful, this court is inclined
to grant an amount of Rs.35,000/-.
6. In the light of the law laid down by the Hon'ble
Supreme Court in the case of V. MEKALA -Vs- M.
MALATHI AND ANOTHER 1, the claimant is entitled for
an amount of Rs.10,000/- towards legal expenses.
Altogether the claimant is entitled for an amount
Rs.4,47,709/- at 6% interest.
7. The claimant is entitled for compensation under
the following heads:
Sl. Description of Items Compensation Awarded No.
(2014) 11 SCC 178
NC: 2023:KHC:45081
1. Loss of future income Rs. 2,24,400/-
2. Pain and suffering Rs. 70,000/-
3. Medical Expenses Rs. 9,809/-
4. Attendant charges Rs. 30,000/-
5. Conveyance charges Rs. 10,000/-
6. Food and nourishment Rs. 16,000/-
7. Loss of income during Rs. 42,500/-
laid up period
8. Loss of Amenities Rs. 35,000/-
9. Legal Expenses Rs. 10,000/-
Total Rs. 4,47,709/-
8. Accordingly, the appeal filed by the claimant is
Allowed-in-part by enhancing the compensation amount
from an amount of Rs.3,25,209/- to Rs.4,47,709/-.
(a) The compensation amount shall carry interest @ 6% per annum from the date of petition, till the date of realization.
(b) Respondent-Insurance Company shall deposit the said compensation amount
NC: 2023:KHC:45081
with accrued interest before the tribunal within a period of 8 (Eight) weeks.
(c) The Registry is directed to return the Trial Court Record to the Tribunal along with the certified copy of the order passed by this court forthwith without any delay.
(d) No Costs.
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand
closed.
Sd/-
JUDGE
TS
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!