Saturday, 09, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mohammad Hussainsab S/O ... vs The State Of Karnataka
2023 Latest Caselaw 6181 Kant

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 6181 Kant
Judgement Date : 30 August, 2023

Karnataka High Court
Mohammad Hussainsab S/O ... vs The State Of Karnataka on 30 August, 2023
Bench: M.Nagaprasannapresided Bymnpj
                                             -1-
                                                   NC: 2023:KHC-D:9727
                                                    WP No. 105039 of 2023




                            IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
                                     DHARWAD BENCH

                         DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2023

                                          BEFORE

                         THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA

                   WRIT PETITION NO. 105039 OF 2023 (KLR-RR/SUR)

                   BETWEEN:

                         MOHAMMAD HUSSAINSAB S/O HUSSAINSAB
                         MULLA,
                         SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS.
                   1.
                         SMT. BEGUMBI W/O MOHAMMAD HUSSAINSAB
                         MULLA,
                         AGE. 71 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE.

                   2.    KHWAJAMAHINODDIN S/O
VISHAL                   MOHAMMADHUSSAINSAB MULLA, AGE. 44
                         YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE.
NINGAPPA
PATTIHAL 3. SAJID AHMAD S/O MOHAMMADHUSSAINSAB
Digitally signed by      MULLA,
VISHAL NINGAPPA          AGE. 39 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE.
PATTIHAL
Date: 2023.08.31    4.   VAHIDA W/O JAMALSAB MULLA,
12:11:03 +0530
                         AGE. 35 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE,

                         ALL R/O KOLIWAD VILLAGE, TQ. HUBBALLI,
                         DIST. DHARWAD-581195.
                                                          ... PETITIONERS

                   (BY SRI. HARSHAWARDHAN .M. PATIL, ADVOCATE)
                            -2-
                                  NC: 2023:KHC-D:9727
                                    WP No. 105039 of 2023




AND:

1.   THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,
     DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,
     BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
     VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560001.

2.   THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, DHARWAD
     DIST. DHARWAD-580008.

3.   THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER,
     HUBLI, DIST. DHARWAD-580008.
4.   THE TAHASILDAR, HUBLI,
     DIST. DHARWAD-580020.

5.   KARNATAKA STATE BOARD OF WAKF
     BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER,
     GUNNINHAGAM ROAD,
     BENGALURU-560001.
                                         ... RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. MADANMOHAN M. KHANNUR, AGA)


      THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICELS 226
AND 227 OF THE CONSTITION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO
ISSUE   WRIT   IN   THE   NATURE    OF   CERTIORARI    BY
QUASHING    THE     IMPUGNED     ENTRY   BASED   ON   THE
MUTATION DATED 08/03/2022 AT COLUMN NO.9 AND 12
IN ROR IN RESPECT OF SY.NO.531/2A/1 MEASURING 3
ACRES 30 GUNTAS SITUATED AT KOLIWAD VILLAGE, TQ.
HUBBALLI, DIST. DHARWAD VIDE ANNEXURE-C.


      THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS
DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
                             -3-
                                  NC: 2023:KHC-D:9727
                                    WP No. 105039 of 2023




                          ORDER

1. Heard the learned counsel Shri Harshawardhan

M.Patil appearing for the petitioners and the learned AGA

Madanmohan M.Khannur appearing for the respondents.

2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners

submits that the issue in the lis stands covered by the

judgment rendered by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court

in W.P. No.147421/2020.

3. The Co-ordinate Bench of this Court held as

under:

"The petitioner has approached this Court in this writ petition with a prayer to quash the endorsement dated 21.03.2019 in proceedings bearing No. No.Kra.San. L.N.D.C.R. 62/2018-19 issued by the fourth respondent vide Annexure-D and also mutation entries dated 27.05.2020 insofar as petitioner is concerned with regard to land bearing Survey No.26/2 and Survey No.26/3 in M.R.No.H-32 of Kadadi village, Gadag Taluk, vide Annexure-E at column No.9 and 12.

NC: 2023:KHC-D:9727 WP No. 105039 of 2023

2. It is the case of the petitioner that he is the absolute owner of the land in dispute and the entries in the revenue records of the land in dispute stood in the name of petitioner as per Annexure-B series. It is his case that pursuant to a circular issued by the State Government, without notice to the petitioner, the entry in respect of land in dispute has now been changed in the name of Wakf Board.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents have not issued any notice to him before changing the revenue entries of the land in dispute and this is in violation of Section 129(2) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that the matter is squarely covered by the order of this Court in W.P.No.84645/2011.

4. Learned Additional Government Advocate does not dispute this aspect of the matter. This writ petition is also therefore disposed of in terms of the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.84645/2011 dated 01.03.2017.

5. The revenue entries in respect of land in dispute in column number 9 and 12 of Annexure-E stands quashed and the name of the concerned

NC: 2023:KHC-D:9727 WP No. 105039 of 2023

persons, which were found prior to the said entry, shall continue.

6. If at all the concerned authorities intend to take any steps for change of the entries in respect of the land in dispute, the same shall be done with notice to the petitioner and the petitioner shall be given an opportunity of hearing, prior to passing any order with regard to change of revenue entries in respect of the land in dispute.

7. The order passed in this writ petition shall not be construed as conferring title with regard to the land in dispute on either of parties. It is for the parties concerned to approach the court of law and seek such other legal remedies to safeguard their interest and title over the land in question.

8. Writ petition accordingly stands disposed of."

4. Learned AGA does not dispute the submission

made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners.

5. In the light of the issue standing covered by the

judgment rendered by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court

NC: 2023:KHC-D:9727 WP No. 105039 of 2023

in W.P. No.147421/2020 (Supra), this petition deserves to

be disposed off.

The petition is disposed off in terms of the afore

quoted order (supra).

Sd/-

JUDGE

vnp*/ct:bck

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter