Saturday, 09, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ramesha @ Ramanna vs Ananda V
2023 Latest Caselaw 6078 Kant

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 6078 Kant
Judgement Date : 30 August, 2023

Karnataka High Court
Ramesha @ Ramanna vs Ananda V on 30 August, 2023
Bench: M.I.Arun
                                            -1-
                                                       NC: 2023:KHC:31514
                                                   MFA No. 7346 of 2019




                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                       DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2023

                                        BEFORE

                           THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.I.ARUN


               MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.7346 OF 2019 (MV-I)

               BETWEEN:

               1.    RAMESHA @ RAMANNA
                     S/O. KALE GOWDA
                     AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS
                     LORRY DRIVER, R/O. CHIKKAL
                     HOLEHONNUR ROAD
                     SHIVAMOGGA CITY-577 201.

                                                             ...APPELLANT
               (BY SRI S.V. PRAKASH, ADVOCATE)

               AND:

               1.    ANANDA V.
                     S/O. VENKATESH
Digitally
                     AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS
signed by H          R/O. NO.39, 1ST ROAD
K HEMA
                     SHANTHINAGARA
Location:
High Court           B.R.PROJECT
of Karnataka         BHADRAVATHI TALUK
                     SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT.

               2.    THE CHOLAMANDALAM
                     M.S. GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.
                     2ND FLOOR, DARE HOUSE
                     NO. 2, NSC BOSE ROAD
                     CHENNAI-600 001.
                                                          ...RESPONDENTS

               (BY SRI MURALIDHAR NAGAVAR, ADVOCATE FOR R.2;
                   R.1: SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED.)
                               -2-
                                             NC: 2023:KHC:31514
                                         MFA No. 7346 of 2019




     THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF M.V. ACT,
PRAYING TO GRANT JUST AND REASONABLE COMPENSATION
AS PRAYED FOR OR AS THIS HON'BLE COURT DEEMS IT
APPROPRIATE BY MODIFYING THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD
DATED 09.04.2019 PASSED BY THE COURT OF LEARNED
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND AMACT VI AT
SHIVAMOGGA IN MVC NO.269/2017 IN SO FAR AS THE
QUANTUM OF THE COMPENSATION IS CONCERNED.

     THIS MFA COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THROUGH
PHYSICAL HEARING/VIDEO CONFERENCING THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:


                         JUDGMENT

1. Aggrieved by the judgment and award dated

09.04.2019 passed in MVC No.269/2017 by the Court of the

Principal Senior Civil Judge and Additional Motor Accidents

Claims Tribunal-VI at Shivamogga (for short 'the Tribunal'),

the petitioner therein has preferred this appeal.

2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to

herein as per their status before the Tribunal.

3. Brief facts of the case are as follows:

On 10.05.2015, at about 1.45 p.m., while the

petitioner was traveling in a motorcycle bearing registration

No.KA-05-HF-0136 met with an accident near Sri Lakshmi

Narasimha Temple, B.R.Project, Lakkavalli with a Luggage

NC: 2023:KHC:31514 MFA No. 7346 of 2019

Auto bearing registration No.KA-14-B-0781. The accident

was caused due to rash and negligent driving of the auto

which was duly insured with respondent no.2/Insurance

Company. The liability is not in dispute. The petitioner due

to the accident sustained the following injuries:

(1) Head injury with extra dural haemorrhage with undisplaced fractures of left parietal and left frontal bone,

(2) Multiple facial bone fractures and right orbit fracture,

(3) Left eye vitreous haemorrhage with left orbit fracture,

(4) Comminuted fracture of right femur,

(5) Type 1 open segmental fracture of right tibia and fracture of fibula,

(6) Laceration 2x1x1 cm over middle and distal phalynger of middle finger of right hand,

(7) Multiple grazed abrasion over right thigh,

(8) Sutured laceration 2 in number 1 cm each in length around right eye.

The Tribunal considering the functional disability due to

the injury being 13%, has awarded a sum of Rs.3,12,680/-

along with interest @ 6% p.a. from the date of petition till

payment as compensation payable by respondent no.2. Not

NC: 2023:KHC:31514 MFA No. 7346 of 2019

satisfied by the same, the petitioner therein has preferred

this appeal.

4. The petitioner was aged 46 years at the time of the

accident and based on the injuries suffered by him, the

Tribunal has taken the total body disability at 13%, which is

not disputed by either of the contesting parties. Taking into

consideration the age of the petitioner, a multiplier of 13 is

applicable as per the law laid down by the Apex Court in

SARLA VERMA & ORS V. DELHI TRANSPORT CORP.&

ANR reported in 2009(6) SCC 121. Further, the petitioner

has not proved his income before the Tribunal and hence,

the income needs to be fixed notionally as per the chart

prepared by the Karnataka State Legal Services Authority in

consultation with Insurance Companies which will be

Rs.9,000/- per month.

5. Based on the above, the petitioner would be entitled to

a sum of Rs.1,82,520/- (Rs.9,000/- X 12 X 13 X 13%)

towards 'loss of future income' as against Rs.1,21,680/-

awarded by the Tribunal.

NC: 2023:KHC:31514 MFA No. 7346 of 2019

6. Given the nature of injuries, six months has to be

considered as laid up period and he would be entitled to a

sum of Rs.54,000/- towards 'loss of income during laid up

period' as against Rs.36,000/- awarded by the Tribunal.

7. The Tribunal has awarded a sum of Rs.60,000/-

towards 'pain and suffering'. Given the nature of injuries, I

deem the same to be appropriate. Towards 'medical

expenses', based on bills submitted, the petitioner has been

awarded a sum of Rs.35,000/-. I deem the same to be

appropriate. Towards 'food, attendant and conveyance

charges', a sum of Rs.30,000/- is awarded. I deem the

same to be appropriate. Towards future medical expenses, a

sum of Rs.30,000/- is awarded based on the evidence let in.

I deem the same to be appropriate.

8. Towards 'loss of amenities', no amount is awarded by the

Tribunal. Given the nature of injuries, I deem it appropriate

to award a sum of Rs.40,000/- under the said head.

9. Thus, the petitioner would be entitled to a sum of

Rs.4,31,520/- as against Rs.3,12,680/- awarded by the

NC: 2023:KHC:31514 MFA No. 7346 of 2019

Tribunal. Accordingly, the petitioner is entitled to an

enhanced compensation of Rs.1,18,840/- (Rs.4,31,520/-

minus Rs.3,12,680/-).

10. Given the bank rate of interest, I deem it appropriate

to award interest @ 6% per annum from the date of petition

before the Tribunal till realisation on the enhanced

compensation.

11. Hence, the following:

ORDER

(i) The appeal is allowed in part;

(ii) Petitioner shall be entitled to an enhanced compensation of Rs.1,18,840/- along with interest @ 6% per annum from the date of petition till realization, which shall be over and above what has already been awarded by the Tribunal;

(iii) Respondent no.2 shall pay the compensation within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order;

(iv) Office to draw modified award accordingly;

NC: 2023:KHC:31514 MFA No. 7346 of 2019

(v) Registry to return the records to the jurisdictional Tribunal forthwith.

SD/-

JUDGE

hkh.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter