Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 5996 Kant
Judgement Date : 28 August, 2023
-1-
NC: 2023:KHC:30527
RSA No. 1551 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1551 OF 2021
BETWEEN:
1. SHIVAPPA
S/O. LATE SOMAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS
2. VEERAPPA
S/O. LATE SOMAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS
3. MAHADEVAPPA
S/O. LATE SOMAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS
ALL ARE RESIDING AT
GURUVINAPURA VILLAGE,
TERAKANAMBI HOBLI,
Digitally signed
by SHARANYA T GUNDLUPET TALUK,
Location: HIGH CHAMARAJANAGAR
COURT OF ...APPELLANTS
KARNATAKA
(BY SMT. SUMATHI S., ADVOCATE [ABSENT])
AND:
1. CHIKKAMADAPPA
(DEAD BY LRS)
1(a) SAKAMMA
W/O. LATE CHIKKAMADAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS
-2-
NC: 2023:KHC:30527
RSA No. 1551 of 2021
1(b) SURESHA
S/O. LATE CHIKKAMADAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS
1(c) G.C.RAMESHA
S/O. LATE CHIKKAMADAPPA
AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS
ALL ARE RESIDING AT
GURUVINAPURA VILLAGE,
TERAKANAMBI HOBLI,
GUNDLUPET TALUK,
CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENTS
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC,
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 16.10.2020
PASSED IN R.A.NO.47/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, GUNDLUPET, ALLOWING THE APPEAL
AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED
31.07.2019 PASSED IN O.S.NO.104/2009 ON THE FILE OF THE
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, GUNDLUPET.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE
COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
This Court, vide order dated 11.08.2023 observed that
this matter is of the year 2021 and the matter is listed third
time for non-compliance of office objections. However, in the
ends of justice, granted one more opportunity to the learned
counsel for the appellants to comply with the office objections
on cost of Rs.500/- payable at Registry and also made it clear
that, if the cost is not paid and the office objections are not
NC: 2023:KHC:30527 RSA No. 1551 of 2021
complied, list the matter for dismissal on the next date of
hearing. Inspite of the said order, the learned counsel for the
appellants has neither paid the cost nor complied with the office
objections.
2. Today, there is no representation on behalf of the
appellants. Hence, in view of the order dated 11.08.2023, the
appeal is dismissed for non-compliance of office objections and
non-payment of cost.
Sd/-
JUDGE
ST
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!