Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 5891 Kant
Judgement Date : 23 August, 2023
-1-
NC: 2023:KHC:30027
CRP No. 479 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF AUGUST, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 479 OF 2021 (SC)
BETWEEN:
1. M/S. TECHNOSPAN STRUCTURES PVT LTD
NO. 229/10, 1ST FLOOR OIL MILL ROAD
OIL MILL COMPOUND
LINGARAJAPURAM POST
BENGALURU 560 094
REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTORS.
2. MR. ABDUL SATHAR THEKKE KRIMADATHIL
MANAGING DIRECTOR
TECHNOSPAN STRUCTURES PVT LTD
NO. 229/10, 1ST FLOOR
OIL MILL COMPOUND
LINGARAJAPURAM POST
Digitally signed
BENGALURU 560 084.
by
DHANALAKSHMI 3. MS THEKKE KARIMADATHIL MARIYAM SANEERA
MURTHY
DIRECTOR
Location: High
Court of M/S TECHNOSPAN STRUCTURES PVT LTD
Karnataka NO. 229/10, 1ST FLOOR
OIL MILL COMPOUND
LINGARAJAPURAM POST
BENGLAURU - 560 084.
4. MR. AMANTHRA KELOTH RAMESH
DIRECTOR
M/S TECHNOSPAN STRUCTURES PVT LTD
NO. 229/10, 1ST FLOOR
OIL MILL COMPOUND
-2-
NC: 2023:KHC:30027
CRP No. 479 of 2021
LINGARAJAPURAM POST
BENGLAURU - 560 084.
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. ANIL REDDY S.,ADVOCATE [ABSENT])
AND:
M/S. BEE-TEE TRADAS (INDIA)
NO. 56/01, S.P. ROAD
BENGLAURU 560 002
REPRESENTED BY ITS
MANAGING PARTNER
MR. TAHER MADARWALA
...RESPONDENT
THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF CPC,
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 30.11.2019
PASSED IN SC.NO.919/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE VI ADDL.
JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES AND ACMM, BENGALURU.
DECREEING THE SUIT FOR RECOVERY OF MONEY.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
When the matter was posted before the Registrar
(R & H) on several occasions and granted sufficient time
for compliance of office objections, none appeared for the
petitioners and office objections were not complied with.
Hence, the matter was posted before this Court on
22.8.2023.
NC: 2023:KHC:30027 CRP No. 479 of 2021
On 22.8.2023, when the matter was called out, none
appeared for the petitioners. Hence, the matter was
ordered to be listed on 23.8.2023 on top of the list under
the caption 'for dismissal'.
Even today when the matter was called out, none
appeared for the petitioners. Even the office objections are
not complied with. It appears that the petitioners are not
interested in prosecuting the case. Hence, the petition is
dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/-
JUDGE
DM
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!