Sri H.B.Ramesh vs Sri V.Ravikumar
2023 Latest Caselaw 5518 Kant

                                          -1-
                                                      NC: 2023:KHC:28375
                                                   CRL.A No. 596 of 2020




                IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                      DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2023

                                        BEFORE
                        THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S RACHAIAH
                        CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.596 OF 2020(A)


              BETWEEN:

              SRI. H.B. RAMESH,
              S/O. H.M. BASAPPA SHETTY,
              AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS,
              R/A NO.1275, 2ND CROSS,
              5TH MAIN, KRISHNAMURTHY PURAM,
              MYSURU.
                                                            ...APPELLANT
              (BY SRI. DILIP KUMAR, ADVOCATE)

              AND:

              SRI. V. RAVIKUMAR,
              S/O. VENKATEGOWDA,
Digitally
signed by N   MAJOR,
UMA
Location:     R/A DOOR NO.1189, 4TH MAIN,
HIGH
COURT OF      ARAVINDA NAGAR,
KARNATAKA
              MYSURU.
                                                          ...RESPONDENT


                     THIS CRL.A IS FILED U/S.378(4) OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO
              SET-ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF ACQUITTAL DATED
              29.12.2015 PASSED BY THE III ADDL. I CIVIL JUDGE AND
              J.M.F.C., MYSURU IN C.C.NO.116/2012 - ACQUITTING THE
                             -2-
                                           NC: 2023:KHC:28375
                                      CRL.A No. 596 of 2020




RESPONDENT/ACCUSED FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 138 OF N.I.
ACT.

       THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

                        JUDGMENT

On perusal of the order sheet, it appears that, the

learned counsel for the appellant has not complied the

office objections even though sufficient time has been

granted, which shows that he is not interested to proceed

with the case. Hence, the criminal appeal stands dismissed

for non-compliance of office objections.

Sd/-

JUDGE SNC