Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 5172 Kant
Judgement Date : 2 August, 2023
-1-
NC: 2023:KHC-D:8126
WP No. 100788 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF AUGUST, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
WRIT PETITION NO. 100788 OF 2021 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
SRI SURESH RAMANGOUDA PATIL,
AGE: 57 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
R/O: BALLIGERI,
TQ: ATHANI, DIST: BELAGAVI-591329.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI BAHUBALI N. KANABARGI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
SRI VASANT NANA KAMBLE,
AGE: 69 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
R/O: ABBIHAL,
TQ: ATHANI, DIST: BELAGAVI-591329.
...RESPONDENT
(BY SRI H.R. DESHPANDE, ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227
YASHAVANT
NARAYANKAR OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE
Digitally signed by
YASHAVANT
NARAYANKAR
NATURE OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT,
Location: High Court
of Karnataka,
Dharwad
ORDER OR DIRECTION AND QUASH THE ORDER DATED 07/07/2018
ON IA NO.04 AND TRIAL COURT HAS REISSUE SALE WARRANT AND
PROCLAMATION DATED 07-01-2021 IN RESPECT OF ATTACHED
PROPERTY SPOT SALE BY 08.02.2021, COURT SALE BY 25.02.2021.
PASSED BY THE PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, ATHANI IN EP 11/16
PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-E.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY,
THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
-2-
NC: 2023:KHC-D:8126
WP No. 100788 of 2021
ORDER
The captioned writ petition is filed by the judgment
debtor assailing the sale warrant and sale proclamation
issued by the executing court.
2. Respondent-plaintiff filed a suit for specific
performance of contract. The said suit was contested by the
petitioner who is owner of the land in question. The
executing court on examination of the material on record
though declined to grant main relief, but suit was partly
decreed granting refund of earnest money. Based on the
decree for refund of earnest money, respondent-plaintiff
appears to have filed execution petition seeking recovery of
earnest money. It is born out from the records that
judgment debtor has not contested the application filed by
the decree holder under Order 21 Rule 66 of CPC. Be that as
it may, this court granted interim order thereby staying the
execution proceedings, subject to the petitioner depositing
25% of the amount. The petitioner who had the benefit of an
interim order has not complied the order by depositing 25%
of the earnest money before the executing court. Therefore,
NC: 2023:KHC-D:8126 WP No. 100788 of 2021
material on record clearly indicates that petitioner has no
intention to repay the amount which is now sought to be
executed by way of execution proceedings. Therefore, I am
not inclined to interfere with the order under challenge.
3. The writ petition being devoid of merits stands
dismissed.
Sd/-
JUDGE
MBS
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!