Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 5131 Kant
Judgement Date : 1 August, 2023
-1-
NC: 2023:KHC:26832
MFA No. 2551 of 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF AUGUST, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 2551 OF 2016 (CPC)
BETWEEN:
SMT M SAKAMMA
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS
W/O SRI. L.C. MAHADEVAIAH
R/AT NO.51, 3RD MAIN
6TH BLOCK, B.S.K. 3RD STAGE
HOSAKEREHALLI, BANGALORE-85.
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. NATARAJA BALLAL., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. SMT PADMAMMA
AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS
W/O LATE C. MARIYAPPA
Digitally signed
by 2. SRI. M.LINGARAJU
DHANALAKSHMI AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
MURTHY S/O LATE C. MARIYAPPA
Location: High
Court of 3. SRI. M. UDAYKUMAR
Karnataka
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS
S/O LATE C. MARIYAPPA
ALL ARE R/AT ITTAMADU VILLAGE
ITTAMADU POST, BIDADI HOBLI
RAMANAGARA TALUK
RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-562109
4. SMT. M. NINGAMMA
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS
-2-
NC: 2023:KHC:26832
MFA No. 2551 of 2016
W/O D.DEVARAJU
D/O LATE C.MARIYAPPA
R/O TIBBEE GOWDANADODDI
HARISANDRA POST, KASABA HOBLI
RAMANAGARA TALUK
RAMANAGARAM DISTRICT-562128.
5. SMT. M. SHIVAMMA
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS
W/O SRI. MARISWAMAIAH
D/O LATE C. MARIYAPPA
R/O SRI. GANGADHARESHWARA
TRADERS, B.M. ROAD
OPP. SBI BANK, BIDADI
RAMANAGARA TALUK
RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-562109.
6. SMT. M. HEMAVATHI
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS
W/O LATE MUDDAMMA
D/O LATE C. MARIYAPPA
R/O NO.15, 4TH CROSS
M.M. ROAD, BYATARAYANAPURA
MYSORE ROAD,BANGALORE-560 026.
7. SMT. M. RADHAMMA
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS
W/O SRI. THAMMAIAH
D/O LATE C. MARIYAPPA
R/O 4TH CROSS ,3RD MAIN
NEAR H.P. GAS OFFICE
RAMANAGARA-562919.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. M H SAWKAR., ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R5 & R7:
NOTICE TO R6 IS SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)
THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER ORDER 43 RULE 1(r) OF CPC,
AGAINST THE ORDER DATED:29.03.2016 PASSED ON IA NO.2
AND IA NO.12 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL
JUDGE, AT RAMANAGARA, ALLOWING IA NO.II FILED U/O 39
RULES 1 AND 2 R/W SEC.151 OF CPC, ALLOWING IA NO.12
FILED U/O 39 RULE 4 OF CPC.
-3-
NC: 2023:KHC:26832
MFA No. 2551 of 2016
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel appearing for the respondent Nos.
1 to 5 and 7 submits that the sole appellant is dead long
back and the legal representatives have not been brought
on record.
2. Hence, the appeal is dismissed as abated.
3. In view of disposal of the main matter, all the
pending applications are disposed of.
Sd/-
JUDGE
CM
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!