Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 2229 Kant
Judgement Date : 13 April, 2023
-1-
RSA No. 712 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF APRIL, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 712 OF 2022 (PAR)
BETWEEN:
A.K. HANUMANTHAPPA
S/O. GANGAMMA,
DECEASED,
1. MARIDEVAPPA,
S/O. LATE A.K. HANUMANTHAPPA ,
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,
AGRICULTURIST,
JAGADISH
S/O. LATE A.K. HANUMANTHAPPA
DEAD BY LRS,
2. SMT. SUNITHA,
W/O. LATE JAGADISH,
Digitally signed AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,
by SHARANYA T
Location: HIGH 3. PRATHAP
COURT OF S/O. LATE JAGADISH,
KARNATAKA
AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS,
4. MANOJ. J
S/O. LATE JAGADISH,
MINOR,
REPRESENTED BY THEIR NATURAL GUARDIAN
MOTHER, APPELLANT NO.2.
ALL ARE R/O. A.K. COLONY,
KUMBLURU VILLAGE, KUMBLURU,
MALEBENNUR HOBLI,
-2-
RSA No. 712 of 2022
HARIHARA TALUK,
DAVANAGERE DISTRICT-577 530.
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. BALU MAHENDRA Y.H., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. SMT. GAYATHRI
W/O. MANJAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,
R/O. YAREHALLI VILLAGE,
YAKKANAHALLI POST,
HONNALI TALUK,
DAVANAGERE DISTRICT-577 219.
2. SMT. GEETHA
W/O. BALAKRISHNA,
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,
R/O. NO.1552/2, 4TH MAIN,
2ND CROSS
NITUVALLI NEW EXTENSION,
DAVANAGERE-577 004.
3. SMT. SUDHA KOLLAPUR
W/O. MUNIYAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS,
R/O. VAIKUNTA TRUST,
HARIHARA ROAD,
DAVANAGERE -577 004.
4. SMT. SAKAMMA
W/O. LATE A.K. HANUMANTHAPPA
(DECEASED)
R/O. VAIKUNTA TRUST,
HARIHARA ROAD,
DAVANAGERE-577 004.
...RESPONDENTS
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST
THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 28.02.2022 PASSED IN
R.A.NO.115/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, DAVANAGERE, ALLOWING
THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE
DATED 31.08.2017 PASSED IN O.S.NO.6/2015 ON THE FILE
OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HARIHAR.
-3-
RSA No. 712 of 2022
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE
COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
This Court, vide order dated 16.02.2023 observed that
appeal was filed in 2022 and matter is listed third time for non-
compliance of office objections and counsel was absent.
However, in the ends of justice, granted two weeks time to
comply with the office objections on cost of Rs.1,500/- payable
at Registry and also made it clear that, if the office objections
are not complied within two weeks, list the matter for dismissal
after two weeks.
Even though the said order was passed on 16.02.2023
granting two weeks time to comply with the office objections on
payment of cost of Rs.1,500/-, learned counsel for the
appellants has not paid the cost and also not complied with the
office objections.
Hence, in view of the peremptory order, the appeal is
dismissed for non-payment of cost and non-compliance of office
objections.
Sd/-
JUDGE
ST
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!