Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Amaresh S/O Irappa Nagoor And Anr vs The State Of Karnataka And Ors
2023 Latest Caselaw 2209 Kant

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 2209 Kant
Judgement Date : 13 April, 2023

Karnataka High Court
Amaresh S/O Irappa Nagoor And Anr vs The State Of Karnataka And Ors on 13 April, 2023
Bench: Jyoti Mulimanipresided Byjmj
                                             -1-
                                                      WP No. 203047 of 2022




                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
                                     KALABURAGI BENCH

                           DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF APRIL, 2023

                                           BEFORE
                           THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI

                          WRIT PETITION NO. 203047 OF 2022 (LB-RES)
                   BETWEEN:

                   1.   AMARESH S/O IRAPPA NAGOOR,
                        AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,
                        OCC: RETD. ENGINEER,
                        IRRIGATION DEPT.,
                        R/O H.NO.19, KC NAGAR,
                        NEAR MUGALKHOD MATH,
                        SHOLAPUR ROAD,
                        VIJAYAPUR - 586 103.

                   2.   HANAMANT S/O REVAPPA UTAGI,
                        AGE: 67 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
                        R/O MATRU KRUPA, KC NAGAR,
                        SOLAPUR ROAD,
                        VIJAYAPURA - 586 103.
Digitally signed                                              ...PETITIONERS
by B NAGAVENI      (BY SRI.D.P.AMBEKAR., ADVOCATE)
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA          AND:

                   1.   THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
                        BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
                        DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT,
                        BENGALURU - 560 001.

                   2.   THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER,
                        VIJAYAPURA - 586 101.

                   3.   THE COMMISSIONER,
                        CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION,
                        VIJAYAPURA - 586 101.
                               -2-
                                        WP No. 203047 of 2022




4.   THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
     PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT,
     VIJAYAPURA DIVISION,
     VIJAYPURA - 586 101.
                                         ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.SHIVAKUMAR R.TENGLI., AGA FOR R1, R2 & R4;
    SRI.VEERSHETTY M., ADVOCATE FOR
    SRI.AMRESH S.ROJA., ADVOCATE FOR R3)

     THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.

       THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING
IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

                           ORDER
           "DECENCY     AND     DIGNITY      ARE   NON-

     NEGOTIABLE FACETS OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND

     ARE    A   FIRST   CHARGE      ON     LOCAL   SELF-

     GOVERNING BODIES".

                                    - JUSTICE KRISHNA IYER.


Sri.D.P.Ambekar., learned counsel for the petitioners,

Sri.Shivakumar R.Tengli., learned AGA for respondents 1, 2

& 4 and Sri.Veershetty.M., learned counsel on behalf of

Sri.Amresh S.Roja., for respondent No.3 have appeared in

person.

2. The brief facts are these:

WP No. 203047 of 2022

The first petitioner is the owner of the house bearing

H.No.19 and the second petitioner is the owner of the house

on Plot No.20 both situated in Sy.No.58/D of K.C. Nagar,

Sholapur Road, Vijayapura. The petitioners purchased the

said plots under the registered sale deeds dated 17.07.1989

and 24.02.1997 respectively. It is said that their names are

entered in the land records and also in the Record of Rights.

It is stated that the first petitioner constructed his

house after obtaining all necessary permission. It is said that

Plot No.19 is abutting the northern side of Plot No.20 and

Vijayapura-Solapur Road runs North-South along the Eastern

boundary of both plots. There is no underground drainage

connection to both houses till today, as the drainage is

situated across the road on the other side. It is said that

there is also a culvert slightly on the southern side through

which drain water is discharged from the western side of the

Solapur Road to the eastern side. However, the size of the

gutter on the eastern side of Solapur Road across the houses

of the petitioners is insufficient and requires to be expanded

in size. In this background, the petitioners made a request to

WP No. 203047 of 2022

Corporation to provide a drainage connection to their houses

and to expand the size of the gutter across the road. But,

the Corporation did not heed the request of the petitioners.

Hence, the first petitioner was constrained to submit

representations on 15.03.2022, 27.04.2022, and 16.09.2022

to the Corporation. It is said that no action is taken so far.

Under these circumstances, the petitioners having left

with no other alternative and efficacious remedy, have filed

this Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of

India.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners and the

respondents have urged several contentions.

Counsel Sri.D.P.Ambekar., in presenting his arguments

submits that inaction on the part of the third respondent in

not providing an underground drainage connection to the

houses of the petitioners is illegal and contrary to the law.

He argued by saying that it is the duty of the Corporation to

provide adequate drainage connection to the houses of the

citizens and the same is covered under Article 21 of the

WP No. 203047 of 2022

Constitution of India as the right to hygienic and clean living

is part of the right to life.

Learned counsel drew the attention of the Court in

Municipal Council, Ratlam, vs. Vardhichand and others

reported in AIR 1980 SC 1622, to contend that Justice

Krishna Iyer way back in the year 1980 in the said decision

has observed and held as under.

"A responsible Municipal council constituted for the precise purpose of preserving public health and providing better finances cannot run away from its principal duty by pleading financial inability. Decency and dignity are non-negotiable facets of human rights and are a first charge on local self-governing bodies. Similarly, providing drainage systems not pompous and attractive, but in working condition and sufficient to meet the needs of the people cannot be evaded if the municipality is to justify its existence".

Learned counsel, therefore, submits that inaction on

the part of the Municipal corporation in not providing an

underground drainage connection to the houses of the

petitioners is unsustainable. Hence, he submitted that a

WP No. 203047 of 2022

direction may be issued to the Municipal Corporation to

provide an underground drainage connection to the houses

of the petitioners situated at Plots Nos.19 and 20.

4. Heard the contentions urged on behalf of the

respective parties and perused the Writ papers and also the

Annexures with utmost care.

The facts have been sufficiently stated and the same

does not require reiteration.

The petitioners are the owners of Plots Nos.19 and 20.

The main grievance of the petitioners is that there is no

underground drainage connection to their houses.

The main argument in the present case revolves

around the responsibility of the Municipal authorities in

providing basic amenities like drainage, roads, electricity

etc.,

It is well known that the underground drainage system is

a must for a healthy environment and proper disposal of

sewage from human society. The two basic essential amenities

WP No. 203047 of 2022

for healthy living are a safe water supply and hygienic

sanitation facilities.

I have perused the judgment of Justice Late. Krishna

Iyer. As rightly pointed out by His Lordship Justice, the basic

amenities and decency and dignity are non-negotiable facets

of human rights. Furthermore, providing an underground

drainage connection is a basic necessity. It is not in dispute

that the petitioners have made several representations, but

the Municipal Corporation has just given the go-by to the

same for the best reasons known to it. The inaction on the

part of the Corporation is untenable. I may venture to say

that if this is not getting noticed nothing will.

Therefore, this Court deems it proper to direct the

Corporation to provide an underground drainage connection

to the petitioners houses.

Resultantly, the City Municipal Corporation, Vijayapura

- third respondent is directed to provide an underground

drainage connection to the houses of the petitioners i.e.,

Plots Nos.19 and 20 both situated in Sy.No.58/D situated at

WP No. 203047 of 2022

K.C.Nagar, Sholapur Road, Vijayapura, within four months

from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. The

Corporation is also directed to examine the grievance of the

petitioners insofar as widening the rainwater drainage

system existing in front of their houses.

With these observations, the Writ Petition is disposed

of.

Sd/-

JUDGE

NB

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter