Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 12165 Kant
Judgement Date : 26 September, 2022
-1-
RFA No. 100106 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 100106 OF 2019
(PAR/DEC)
BETWEEN:
1. SHANKRAPPA FAKKIRAPPA
CHILLUR (MUDIMALLA)
AGE: 44 YEARS,
OCC: AGRICULTURE,
R/O: YAREBUDIHAL,
TQ: KUNDAGOL,
DISTRICT: DHARWAD.
2. VINAYAK SHANKRAPPA
CHILLUR (MUDIMALLA)
AGE: 9 YEARS,
OCC: STUDENT,
(SINCE MINOR REPRESENTED BY
Digitally HIS NATURAL MOTHER
signed by J
MAMATHA SMT.RENUKA
J Location:
MAMATHA Dharwad W/O SHANKRAPPA
Date:
2022.09.27
16:40:16
CHILLUR (MUDIMALLA)
+0530
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. C.R. HIREMATH, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. SMT.NINGAMMA
D/O. BASVARAJ MUDIMALLA
(MUDIMALLANAVAR)
AGE: 24 YEARS,
OCC: AGRICULTURE,
R/O: YAREBUDIHAL,
-2-
RFA No. 100106 of 2019
TQ: KUNDAGOL,
DISTRICT: DHARWAD.
2. BASAVARAJ
S/O FAKKIRAPPA MUDIMALLA
(MUDIMALLANAVAR)
AGE: 52 YEARS,
OCC: AGRICULTURE,
R/O: YAREBUDIHAL,
TQ: KUNDAGOL,
DISTRICT: DHARWAD.
3. FAKKIRESH BASAVARAJ MUDIMALLA
(MUDIMALLANAVAR)
AGE: 26 YEARS,
OCC: AGRICULTURE,
R/O: YAREBUDIHAL,
TQ: KUNDAGOL,
DISTRICT: DHARWAD.
4. PUNEET BASAVARAJ MUDIMALLA
(MUDIMALLANAVAR)
AGE: 16 YEARS,
OCC: STUDENT,
R/O: YAREBUDIHAL,
TQ: KUNDAGOL,
DISTRICT: DHARWAD.
(SINCE HE IS MINOR,
REPRESENTED BY HIS
NATURAL FATHER DEFT NO.1).
5. KAVITA
D/O. BASAVARAJ MUDIMALLA
(MUDIMALLANAVAR)
AGE: 22 YEARS,
OCC: AGRICULTURE,
R/O: YAREBUDIHAL,
TQ: KUNDAGOL,
DISTRICT: DHARWAD.
-3-
RFA No. 100106 of 2019
6. SMT.MANJULA
W/O. BASAVARAJ MUDIMALLA
(MUDIMALLANAVAR)
AGE: 40 YEARS,
OCC: AGRICULTURE,
R/O: YAREBUDIHAL,
TQ: KUNDAGOL,
DISTRICT: DHARWAD.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. LAXMAN T. MANTAGANI, ADVOCATE FOR C/R1)
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER ORDER 41, RULE 1 READ
WITH SECTION 96 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND
DECREE DTD 21.01.2019 PASSED IN O.S.NO.15/2017 ON THE
FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
FIRST CLASS, KUNDGOL, DECREEING THE SUIT FILED FOR
PARTITION AND SEPARATE POSSESSION.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THROUGH
PHYSICAL HEARING/VIDEO CONFERENCING HEARING, THIS
DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellants has filed a memo
for dismissal of the appeal as not pressed, since the
matter has already been settled among the parties.
In view of the memo, the appeal is dismissed as not
pressed.
Sd/-
JUDGE ST
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!