Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 12028 Kant
Judgement Date : 21 September, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
KALABURAGI BENCH
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2022
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE H.B.PRABHAKARA SASTRY
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL B. KATTI
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL No.32630/2013 (LAC)
BETWEEN:
Syed Sarvar Hussaini
Since deceased by his L.R.
Syed Hameed Hussain
So Late Syed Hameed Hussaini
Age: 32 years, Occ: Agriculture
R/o Nagur,
Tq. & Dist. Kalaburagi
... Appellant
(By Sri Ganesh S. Kalburgi and Sri Ananth S.J., Advocates)
AND:
1. The Chief Engineer,
KNNL IP Zone, Kalaburagi
2. The Executive Engineer
KNNL, Bennitora Divn. No.1
Kalaburagi
3. The Special Land Acquisition Officer
M & M.I.P. Kalaburagi
... Respondents
MFA No.32630/2013
2
(By Sri Gourish S. Kashampur, Advocate for R1 and R2;
Sri Mallikarjun C. Basareddy, Govt. Advocate for R3)
This Miscellaneous First Appeal is filed under Section
54(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, praying to allow this appeal
and to enhance the compensation by modifying the judgment
and award dated 07.08.2013 passed in LAC No.242/2006 by
the learned III Addl. Senior Civil Judge, Gulbarga, by fixing the
market value at `27,80,000/- with all consequential and
statutory benefits etc., in the interest of justice.
This appeal coming on for final hearing, through
physical hearing/video conference, this day
Dr.H.B.Prabhakara Sastry J., made the following:
ORDER
Learned counsels on record for the appellant
Sri Ganesh S. Kalburgi or Sri Ananth S. J. are neither
present physically nor through video conference. Learned
counsel Sri Yashas Dixit is physically present and prays for
a week's accommodation. Admittedly, the said learned
counsel Sri Yashas Dixit, though permitted, has not filed
vakalath for the appellant. The counsel for the appellant
Sri Ganesh Kalburgi and Sri Ananth S.J., who as on the date,
hold vakalath for the appellant, have remained absent.
MFA No.32630/2013
The appeal is of the year 2013. It is a land
acquisition matter of the year 2006. Thus, for sixteen
years a land acquisition matter has not reached its finality
and the appellant is still seeking time. However, today the
learned counsels for the appellant on record have also
remained absent. As such, the appeal stands dismissed
for non-prosecution.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE
swk
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!