Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 11760 Kant
Judgement Date : 12 September, 2022
-1-
MFA No. 6718 of 2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 6718 OF 2012 (MV-)
BETWEEN:
MANAGER
NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.,
COLLEGE ROAD, MADIKERI TOWN,
M.G.ROAD, MADIKERI-571 201
NOW REPTD. BY ITS
REGIONAL MANAGER
NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.,
REGIONAL OFFICE 2-B,
UNITY BUILDING, ANNEXE, P.KALINGA RAO ROAD,
BANGALORE-560 027
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. A.N.KRISHNA SWAMY, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. SMT A.S. BALKISH BANU
W/O LATE SAJAVUDDIN
NOW AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,
Digitally
signed by R/A # 39, VIDYANAGARA,
PANKAJA S MADIKERI TOWN, KODAGU DISTRICT
Location:
High Court
of Karnataka 2. M.SAHAUL HAMEED
S/O MOHAMMAD
NOW AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS,
R/A # 78, RAJARAJESHWARI NAGAR,
MADIKERI TOWN
-2-
MFA No. 6718 of 2012
3. M ABDUL SADIQ
S/O N.P.SHEKABBA
NOW AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS,
# 5/36-A, GANAPATHY STREET,
MADIKERI TOWN
...RESPONDENTS
(R-1 TO R-3 SERVED)
MFA FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED: 06.03.2012 PASSED IN MVC
NO.03/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, MACT,
MADIKERI, AWARDING A COMPENSATION OF Rs.58,000/-
WITH INTEREST @ 6% P.A. ON Rs.43,000/- FROM THE DATE
OF PETITION TILL DEPOSIT OR RECOVERY.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
1. This appeal is by the Insurer challenging the award
of compensation of Rs.58,000/- to the claimant for the
injuries suffered by her.
2. The main contention of the Insurer is that the
offending vehicle did not possess a valid permit and the
driver of the said offending vehicle did not possess the
requisite endorsement to drive the vehicle. In short, it is
the case of the Insurer that it would not be liable to pay
compensation due to breach in the policy conditions.
MFA No. 6718 of 2012
3. In the light of the judgment of the Full Bench of this
Court in the case of NEW INDIA INSURANCE & CO.
LIMITED Vs. YALLAVA & OTHERS - 2020 (2) AKR
484, the Insurer would have to first satisfy the
compensation and thereafter, proceed to recover the same
from the owner of the offending vehicle. As a
consequence, the award of Rs.58,000/- to the claimant is
affirmed and it is held that the Insurer shall pay the same
to the claimant and thereafter, shall proceed to recover
the same from the owner of the offending vehicle. The
appeal is, therefore, dismissed.
4. The amount in deposit, if any, shall be transmitted to
the Tribunal for disbursement in terms of the award.
SD/-
JUDGE
PKS CT:AN
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!